Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

American Democracy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • American Democracy

    There's some disagreement about the date of the inception of democracy in the United States. Was America a democracy from the start? Can a line be drawn? Does democracy exist anywhere?
    44
    1775 - Second Continental Congress
    6.82%
    3
    1776 - Declaration of Independence
    4.55%
    2
    1781 - Articles of Confederation, Yorktown
    4.55%
    2
    1783 - Peace with the British Empire
    0.00%
    0
    1788 - Adoption of the Constitution
    9.09%
    4
    1789 - First Presidential Election
    4.55%
    2
    1802 - Repeal of the Alien and Sedition Acts
    0.00%
    0
    1828 - Universal White Male Suffrage
    0.00%
    0
    1863 - Abolition of Slavery
    0.00%
    0
    1870 - Universal Male Suffrage
    0.00%
    0
    1920 - Universal Suffrage
    27.27%
    12
    1964 - Prohibition of Entrenched Racism/Sexism
    6.82%
    3
    3001 - NIXON's BACK!
    9.09%
    4
    It's not a democracy without proportional representation.
    27.27%
    12
    Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com

  • #2
    Dammit. The form cut off two of my options:
    ( ) It's not a democracy without referenda on major issues.
    ( ) Vote Chiquita Banana for President!

    Could a moderator add them? Thanks.
    Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Virginia and Massachusetts both had fully functioning (ok, fully for white male land owners) colonial assembles in the 17th century (I.E. 1600's).
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Oerdin
        Virginia and Massachusetts both had fully functioning (ok, fully for white male land owners) colonial assembles in the 17th century (I.E. 1600's).
        How can you have any kind of democracy (rule with the explicit consent of the majority) when the majority can't vote?

        Comment


        • #5
          The US was never conceived of as a Democracy. The framers feared and distrusted democracy as mob rule. That being said, the founders were all adherents to Liberalism. They wanted to create a Republic consistent within the framework of Enlightenment Liberalism. They did so. The US has been a Liberal Republic since inception.

          However, to be consistent with our current understanding of democracy (everyone gets a vote), I'd say that the US became a "democracy" with universal suffrage.
          I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - Pekka

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Oerdin
            Virginia and Massachusetts both had fully functioning (ok, fully for white male land owners) colonial assembles in the 17th century (I.E. 1600's).


            I was thinking more along the lines of country-wide practices. Universal suffrage was implemented in many states several decades before it became federal law.
            Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Wycoff
              The US was never conceived of as a Democracy. The framers feared and distrusted democracy as mob rule. That being said, the founders were all adherents to Liberalism. They wanted to create a Republic consistent within the framework of Enlightenment Liberalism. They did so. The US has been a Liberal Republic since inception.

              However, to be consistent with our current understanding of democracy (everyone gets a vote), I'd say that the US became a "democracy" with universal suffrage.
              yeah what he said. We're not much more than a constitutional republic, but we do allow everyone to vote for certain offices.

              I would go with universal suffrage as well. Sure black men and women were still pressured in some areas. But overall, everyone could vote- at least in theory.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Geronimo
                How can you have any kind of democracy (rule with the explicit consent of the majority) when the majority can't vote?
                Well, Athens is considered a democracy

                More seriously, it's a good question. "Democracy" is a word that requires a good defnition, which is not always easy. Robert A. Dahl has provided a widely accepted definition (though scholars are not unanimous to support it), in 8 criteria. I don't know them by heart, and I must go eat, but feel free to go look for them on google
                "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                Comment


                • #9
                  The Articles of Confederation. I think the question of democracy is important. Are we looking at it from our view of democracy, or what democracy meant at the period of time. After all, blacks and women were not considered to be full persons at that time. So, that question is important to consider.
                  “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                  - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Geronimo
                    How can you have any kind of democracy (rule with the explicit consent of the majority) when the majority can't vote?
                    How did Athens have democracy? Democracy should be defined more by form than by universal suffrage.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                      The Articles of Confederation. I think the question of democracy is important. Are we looking at it from our view of democracy, or what democracy meant at the period of time. After all, blacks and women were not considered to be full persons at that time. So, that question is important to consider.
                      Blacks and women considered themselves to be full persons at the time

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Kuciwalker


                        How did Athens have democracy? Democracy should be defined more by form than by universal suffrage.
                        Naw. Otherwise I could have a government where only members of a particular religion that constitutes 3% of the population can vote and claim that it is a 'democracy'.

                        Athens could only be considered a democracy if we declare that all of the non voting inhabitants weren't even citizens but just regarded as the equivalent of foreign non-citizen residents.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Geronimo
                          Blacks and women considered themselves to be full persons at the time
                          That's nice, but doesn't mean anything.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                            Democracy should be defined more by form than by universal suffrage.
                            To me, that's necessary to call a Liberal government a representative Democracy. Any Liberal government without universal suffrage cannot be considered a "Democracy"
                            I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - Pekka

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Don't forget that traditional definitions aren't necessarily very helpful for this sort of discussion. We have at least two mostly unrelated interpretations of 'democracy' to contend with. One is the idealistic and constantly evolving 'democracy' as an ideology and virtue which has inspired revolutions and the other is a definition resulting from a sort of dry taxonomy of government structures which has had far less significance historically, except as a way of describing results after the fact.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X