Federal rules in multi state class actions are more onerous than any state rules, because of some, well, interesting, Supreme Court precedents. This makes it more costly and time-consuming to bring a class action in federal court (if the costs are too much, not going to be brought at all, of course). Anyway, can someone explain to me why state courts shouldn't be able to hear STATE LAW claims? Where is this states' rights thing I keep hearing about?
Though I do agree with the anti-coupon law attached to this one.
Though I do agree with the anti-coupon law attached to this one.
. Frankly having the district court look at every single law of every state in which the class plaintiffs are from and come up with one decision taking into account and applying all those laws is kind of absurd. At the very least some guidance could have been given... but it's the SCOTUS, so of course not
Comment