Tweet
Originally posted by Saras
Almost?
Almost?
Paula Jones?
Lily Langtree was at least good looking.
-
Remember Lewinski?
Paula Jones?
Lily Langtree was at least good looking.
Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915 -
Originally posted by molly bloom
Remember <...> Paula Jones?
Originally posted by Serb:Please, remind me, how exactly and when exactly, Russia bullied its neighbors?
Originally posted by Ted Striker:Go Serb !
Originally posted by Pekka:If it was possible to capture the essentials of Sepultura in a dildo, I'd attach it to a bicycle and ride it up your azzes.Comment
-
Quite.Originally posted by Saras
Even David Blunkett's dog would have refused.Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915Comment
-
One can only hope they'll skip that ****** and go for William instead.Originally posted by chegitz guevara
If he's marrying a divorcé, doesn't that mean he's not eligible to become King?Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Yeah, 'cuz he seems to be a lot more intelligent and world savvy....
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - EpicurusComment
-
-
At least he has less baggage.Originally posted by alva
Yeah, 'cuz he seems to be a lot more intelligent and world savvy....
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Why should our taxes support any of the inbred f**ks? Get rid I say!
Comment
-
The brits need to get rid of these kleptoparasitic idiots and become a republic. I don't get why countries keep constitutional monarchs, they are not needed in a democracy.Comment
-
Many are indifferent between a Republic and a Constitutional Monarchy.
Besides they are net providers to the economy simply by existing.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
how is that possible?Originally posted by Dauphin
Besides they are net providers to the economy simply by existing."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburgerComment
-
Well don't pay them and let them exist - then there is a net positive. Besides if The Queen stood for president I doubt she'd have much of a contest - she's by far the most experienced for the position
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda SmithComment
-
It really doesn't cost the taxpayers much to keep them around and their mere existence draws in tourist and media dollars. I can't vouch for them being net providers, but I could see how it might be the case.Originally posted by MRT144
how is that possible?"The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - DissidentComment
-
For starters, Royal weddings and Jubilees are great tourist attractions.Originally posted by MRT144
how is that possible?One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
No, no... the Brits need a monarchy. Without it all the tabloids would collapse causing an economic crisis.
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)Comment
Comment