Not only the end date, I was actually talking about the map you're gonna use too, sorry I didn't make it clear enough. I think if you're not going to include the whle Mediterranean, it's better to go ahead just with the Western Med, which is a "logical" division. Having Athenians, Spartans and Persians out will surely make things easier for you.
Also, I'd say that the battle for Western Med dominance was already resolved at 202 BC. Carthage wasn't a real menace for Rome thereafter, they were allowed to keep just a few ships and their power wasn't comparable to that of Rome. In the end, Rome chose to wipe Carthage out because they had inherited a sort of psychological fear to Carthaginians from the days of Hannibal, I guess...
By the way,
Here are some more things I learned looking at Harrison's Spain at the Dawn of History book (unfortunately I couldn't check it out).
Ullastret - one of the first and biggest towns in Spain, from about 700 to 200 BC. In very close symbiotic relationship with Emperion. The name sounds strange to me - is that the real name of the town, or just the name of the site?
Tivissa and Tarragona potential early towns. Tarrragona hard to say cos completely rebuilt in the Roman era.
Castulo was a big one, and Carmona.
The Ebro valley generally didn't urbanize until later. Most towns would be near the Western and Southern coasts. Harrison says the ancient Greek writers are probably the best guess sources right now, since so little archaeology has been done on this topic, especially outside Aragon and the Guadalquivir.
Comment