Wow, this is a terrific scenario Pablostuka! Congratulations.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MARRUECOS - Final version available!
Collapse
X
-
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
-
Well, as far as I know, the war is very unpopular in Spain, and according to the New York Times, a very leftist party (can't remember the name) will almost certainly win the next election. So, say that they took Spain out of Iraq, and in revenge, Gephardt is using this as an opportunity to get revenge on Spain, and get some new contracts for the US.Vote Democrat
Support Democracy
Comment
-
-
Pablostuka, here are a couple of sugestions:
1) limit the amount of stuff helicopters and transport aircraft can carry to one unit or reduce the numbers present in the scenario. At the moment it's way too easy to move the entire Spanish Army across the strait of Gibraltar. For reference, a C-130 can carry a single AFV or a company of infantry and a Puma chopper can carry either a squad of infantry or a single artillery gun and it's crew. Airlifting two or three battalions per tern should be the limit of Spain's air transport capacity. BTW, AFAIK, nothing in Spain's air inventory can carry tanks - there should be a house rule requireing that these be moved by sea.
2) On the topic of the entire Spanish Army, are you sure that it all needs to be included in the scenario? The scenario would be more balanced if the only units opposing the Morrocans were the rapid deployment forces (the Paras, Marines and the Spanish Rapid Deployment Division). In the real world, it takes anywhere from a week to a month for 'heavy' units to be ready to move out from their barracks, and the scenario would be better if this was included - especially as you're assuming that the Morrocans achieve near total suprise.
On the topic of US involvement, any Morocan attack on Spanish territory would satisfy the terms of the NATO treaty ('an attack on one is an attack on all'). Of course, the other countries may be embarresed at helping Spain protect the last vestiges of it's empire. Given the situation between Britain and Spain over Gibraltar, Britain may also get involved on Spain's side, just to make a point about the legitimacy of having small enclaves in other countries territory [though Blair does seem to be strangely keen to surrender Gibralter to Spain]
There's a British light infantry battalion based at Gibraltar (the Royal Gibraltar Regiment) and there are usually some RN ships nearby. The 16th Air Assault Brigade could rapidly be flown in, and a battalion of Royal Marines could quickly be brought in by sea within a couple of weeks.Last edited by Case; December 29, 2003, 01:16.'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Comment
-
Not to be nit-picky, but also, Ceuta only has a beach 25 m long. That is the only 25 m on the island where an amphibious attack is possible. Imagine just a company entrenched to defend a 25 m strip. And with mines, it is overkill.Vote Democrat
Support Democracy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Case
Pablostuka, here are a couple of sugestions:
1) limit the amount of stuff helicopters and transport aircraft can carry to one unit or reduce the numbers present in the scenario. At the moment it's way too easy to move the entire Spanish Army across the strait of Gibraltar. For reference, a C-130 can carry a single AFV or a company of infantry and a Puma chopper can carry either a squad of infantry or a single artillery gun and it's crew. Airlifting two or three battalions per tern should be the limit of Spain's air transport capacity. BTW, AFAIK, nothing in Spain's air inventory can carry tanks - there should be a house rule requireing that these be moved by sea.
Initially, the helicopters only carried infantry (same as now), and the airplanes only infantry or light vehicles. But the playability was reduced a lot, ad the game became very boring...
Our air inventory of CASA C.212, CASA CN-235, CASA C-295 and Lockheed C-130 Hercules doesn't let us to carry our tanks, but let's see when the Airbus A-400M arrives...
2) On the topic of the entire Spanish Army, are you sure that it all needs to be included in the scenario? The scenario would be more balanced if the only units opposing the Morrocans were the rapid deployment forces (the Paras, Marines and the Spanish Rapid Deployment Division). In the real world, it takes anywhere from a week to a month for 'heavy' units to be ready to move out from their barracks, and the scenario would be better if this was included - especially as you're assuming that the Morrocans achieve near total suprise.
It takes a few turns to mobilise them. The turns that the Moroccans need to secure the captured areas to prevent any Spanish counterattack.
On the topic of US involvement, any Morocan attack on Spanish territory would satisfy the terms of the NATO treaty ('an attack on one is an attack on all').
And the same fact: Playability. If I include NATO forces in the scen, the Moroccans won't have a chance for surviving.
I am a 100% realism guy, but I had to 'behave' in this one to satisfy the players
There's a British light infantry battalion based at Gibraltar (the Royal Gibraltar Regiment) and there are usually some RN ships nearby. The 16th Air Assault Brigade could rapidly be flown in, and a battalion of Royal Marines could quickly be brought in by sea within a couple of weeks.
Aniway, I hope you enjoy the scen
And remember...it's not realism, it's playabilityLast edited by Pablostuka; December 29, 2003, 07:41.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Art of War
Two things that could be corrected in the scenario...
1) The AV-8B Harrier should be the EAV-8B Matador....it is the spanish version of the harrier.
The designation is AV-8B+ Harrier Plus 'Matador'. But too long for a Civ2 scenario
2) Wouldn't the US be forced to help...especially with Spain's support in Gulf War 2 of 2003?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pablostuka
Well...I included the entire 2 armies (Spanish and Moroccan). What's the advantage to fight the entire Moroccan army with only the fast deployment units?
I can't show you guys how looks our Armed Forces
More or less these are the numbers, and the Spanish units are in their actual bases.
It takes a few turns to mobilise them. The turns that the Moroccans need to secure the captured areas to prevent any Spanish counterattack.
That only would apply to the Canary Islands. For some weird reason Ceuta and Melilla are not under NATO protection
And the same fact: Playability. If I include NATO forces in the scen, the Moroccans won't have a chance for surviving.
Aniway, I hope you enjoy the scen'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Comment
-
Technically, Ceuta and Melilla are colonial possesions and, therefore are not protected by NATO. However, the Canary Islands, being islands in the North Atlantic are considered island possesions, besides hosting many strategic bases for the USN and USAF.Vote Democrat
Support Democracy
Comment
-
Another excellent scenario Pablostuka! My brother isn't much of a scenario fan (preferring vanilla Civ) but I managed to rope him into playing me in a game.
With only 10 turns, it's short and sweet, a definite bonus!
Any chance of a single player version also?STDs are like pokemon... you gotta catch them ALL!!!
Comment
Comment