The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
The Apaches as far as i know(in the greek army at least) have green colours.
Steel panthers III is a tactical combat game, divisional level. It is really, really cool.
"Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII
All those who want to die, follow me!
Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.
Originally posted by jim panse
Hmmmmmm, Refugees ....... not that bad that idea. i thought about it myself but I don´t know which role they should play. Hmmmmmm ....
maybe something like you desperately need to keep them alive or else you loose money?
also you could disband them and gain shields like in "under siege"
"Peace cannot be kept by force.
It can only be achieved by understanding"
Originally posted by Palaiologos
Have you ever played Steel panthers III?
It has a NATO vs USSR scenario in the 1990s. Many usefull ideas(about startegical movements, war objectives etc) in there.It certainly worths a look.
Pity it was absolutely bloody impossible.
"Paul Hanson, you should give Gibraltar back to the Spanish" - Paiktis, dramatically over-estimating my influence in diplomatic circles.
Apart from the Stalingrand campaign all others were pretty much feasible.
"Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII
All those who want to die, follow me!
Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.
I don't think you should stick my WW2 British tank commander on my Challenger 2. He's wearing khaki (last worn by the British Army c. 1960s) and he's way too big for the tank pic. The tank comanders drawn by Curt are a better size.
You've used my Tornado ADV (fighter used only by Britain) as the generic Nato fighter. The IDS pic I posted is the multi-national one.
Seems I forgot to stick a shadow on my SU-25.
Where are the Nato IFVs?
Shouldn't you use a more modern SPA?
PS I think Jimmywax may look with interest at the MLRS graphic.
The French were not commited to defending Germany in the event of a Warpac invasion IIRC.
You should remove the grey from the generic unit's symbols - it obscures the civ colour. Just use the symbol.
Ok, I´ll fix that very soon. Has anyone made a Mil-24 Hind graphic, btw? Thank you again for pointing these things out.
I´ll change the briish uniforms, as well as the other things.
NATO´s IFV = M113
SPA = M110, sorry, it looks a bit like the gfx I´ve used
maybe something like you desperately need to keep them alive or else you loose money?
That´s good. I think this will do it.
What on earth have Austria got to do with it?
Austria simply IS there. Additional to this sad fact: I don´t know if you know that there were detailed plans by NATO and the Wasrsaw Pact to violate our Neutrality in case of war. (The Russians only wanted to march through the Danube Valley, the US wanted to throw some H-Bombs to make Austria "impassable". These are the reasons why I included Austria.
The M113 is an old APC not an IFV. The US, UK and German armies generally use IFVs now, which are proper Infantry Fighting Vehicles fitted with a cannon. Examples are the Bradley, Warrior, BMP series and Marder. Rather than a Russian hovercraft (!) I'd have maybe US and UK or German IFV slots.
The M110 is old-hat too - the UK now uses MLRS and AS90, and the US use MLRS and various marks of M109.
And it's the size of the bloke you've stuck on the roof of the Challenger that's the problem. Use one of Curt's men.
"Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII
All those who want to die, follow me!
Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.
Ok folks, here comes the new & edited units gallery!
maybe something like you desperately need to keep them alive or else you loose money?
@ arthedain: Good idea, I took this WW2 truck and this unit will appear once an enemy has captured a city. It´ll have the trade flag. If you can manage to save these units you may disband/use this caravan!
The M110 is old-hat too - the UK now uses MLRS and AS90, and the US use MLRS and various marks of M109.
@ fairline: I´ll leave the M110s out as you suggested. I think I´ll increase the numbers of the Field Artillery pieces of each civ.
The M113 is an old APC not an IFV. The US, UK and German armies generally use IFVs now, which are proper Infantry Fighting Vehicles fitted with a cannon. Examples are the Bradley, Warrior, BMP series and Marder. Rather than a Russian hovercraft (!) I'd have maybe US and UK or German IFV slots.
@ fairline: I included the Marder (Ger), Warrior (UK) and the LAV-2A3 (USA). The Communists have the BMP-3.
As for unit ideas i think a must have is an allied attack choper, apache, cobra or something.
@ Palaiologos: Now also the Mil-24H Hind is included.
And now for the Nuke Problem:
judging from the map this is a tactical oriented scenario.So nukes aren't really fit.Unless they are tactical nukes of course.
Well, this is something special in this scenario. There are two nukes as you can see.
(1) The flying one is a "small" tactical nuke. As you know the Nuclear Powers have not only these horrible ICBMs and H-Bombs but also smaller rockets (which could be used for conventional warheads as well, e.g. the Tomahawk Cruise Missile) that can also be used for carrying nuclear warheads. These tactical nukes may be used to attack tactical targets without nuking the hell out of a target. These nukes will have an attack value around 70-90, this means that they are not nukes in the Civ2 sense but usage of these weapons will cause mayhem too as noone wished Middle Europe become nuked away for the next 10 million years.
(2) The other nuke is a "real" nuke (in the Civ2 sense). this unit has 99 attack and will definitely cause much more mayhem than the tactical nukes. You will need to fail in the early (conventional) campaign to receive techs that allow you the research further techs leading to the tech with which you can finally ready your ICBMs. I renamed the Manhattan Project wonder to "Nuclear Arms Readying". This has the following reasons:
* You cannot nuke your enemy in the beginning (though you will wish you could .... ).
* If things go well for you some nuke can hit your head too ....... because then the war is not going good for your enemy.
* Readying your nuclear arsenal cannot be hidden in reality, so I thought it should not be hidden in that scenario. The "Nuclear Arms Readying" wonder makes it possible for both sides to have the opportunity to nuke the enemy. This will prevent the following situation: Imagine a "normal" Civ2 game when you are technologically that advanced that you can nuke all your enemies without fearing any consequence (except those weird Knight attacks against tanks ). After the wonder is built you can build nukes. But be sure: The enemy will use them too. For every single nuke that is destroyed your enemy will get a new ICBM via event.
Ok, as I updated the units, I posted the latest version (including the M2 Bradley IFV)
Originally posted by jim panse
@ fairline: I included the Marder (Ger), Warrior (UK) and the LAV-2A3 (USA). The Communists have the BMP-3.
In 1991 the only US service using the LAV was the USMC, and it was tasked to go to either Norway or the Med in the event of war. The US Army used the M-2 Bradley of which it had thousands in Europe.
Also, I don't think that the BMP-3 had gone into production in significant numbers in 1991 - the BMP-2 was the mainstay of the Warsaw Pact IFV/APC fleet in 91.
Other notes on units:
*Fairline may beat me for saying this, but AFAIK, the Scottish regiments are no longer considered to be above average.
*By 1991 the TU-95 Bear was only used as a maritime recon aircraft and cruise missile launch platform
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Comment