Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ok, as the secrecy is broken ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • They look good Jim.

    If I were to nitpick your unit names (and I usually do) then I'd suggest changing 'Comp' for the armoured regiments to 'Squadron'. British nomencalture for the Armoured Corps was:

    UK: = US:
    Troop = Platoon
    Squadron = Company
    Regiment = Battalion
    Brigade = Regiment

    Confusing, I know, but British and commonwealth cavalry and artillery 'regiments' are equivalent to US Battalions

    BTW if you need to abbreviate to get the names to fit civ, then Sqn = squadron and Coy = company
    http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.ph...ory:Civ2_Units

    Comment


    • You've got me into sad bstard wargamer mode here Jim. One more thing: there should be 2-3 times as many Sherman Vs as VC (each troop of 4 tanks had 1 firefly and 3 75mm Shermans in '44), so if you are using Squadrons rather than regiments as the civ scale for tank units then you should have 9 squadrons of shermans in the Gds Amd Division. Of these, 2-3 should be Fireflies and 6-7 75-mm Shermans.

      While I'm going off on one, it's worth noting that the 17-pdr fitted to the firefly was a much better AT gun than either the 88 in the Tiger VIE or the Panther's 75, but wasn't as good with AP rounds as either these or the standard Sherman. You could simulate this by giving the fireflies the same attack (or slightly lower than) a standard Sherman but give them the pikeman bonus against movement =2 units. Obviously, defence-wise they need to be lower than the German tanks.

      In answer to your question abi=out the Stuart light tanks: leave 'em out. The Yanks had separate light battalions intheir armd divisions whereas the Brits used them only for the recce platoons (not troops!) of each armoured regiment. By this stage of the war many of them had their turrets removed and fought as scout cars('Stuart Kangeroos') as their guns were ineffectual against most German armour
      http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.ph...ory:Civ2_Units

      Comment


      • That´s what I wanted to hear from you Gareth. Thanks a lot.

        Comment


        • Firefly better AT capabilities than the Tiger's 88m?
          Strongly doubt it.

          Let those Shermans take on some KVs and T-34s and we will see who has better AT gun.
          "Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII

          All those who want to die, follow me!
          Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.

          Comment


          • You may doubt it Pericles, but it's true. Look what you've done now, you've made me move seamlessly from geeky wargamer to geeky engineer...

            OK, lots of tests were done by the allies and Germans both during and after the war with AT guns and target vehicles. There are a lot of factors which effect the penetration ability of AT rounds, but for sake of argument the main ones are armour quality and slope from the trajectory of the round, ammunition type (ballistic properties and material of the 'cap'), the distance of the target from the gun and the muzzle velocity of the gun. Are you still awake there at the back?

            Anyhow.. if you take a level playing field of a distance from gun to target of 1000m and an armour slope of 30° you get the following results for late war guns (if you're even slightly interested):

            British:
            17-pdr standard ammo-------120-130mm of armour
            (apc or apcbc ) penetrated
            17-pdr special ammo(apds)--190-230mm
            77mm apcbc --------------------100-110mm
            77mm apds----------------------150-160mm
            6-pdr apcbc----------------------75-80mm
            6-pdr apds-----------------------120-145mm
            75mm apcbc---------------------60-65mm
            75mm M61 ammo---------------75-90mm

            The 17-pdr was fitted to the Firefly, the '77mm' to the Comet and the 75mm was used in Shermans, Churchills and Cromwells. As you can see, Firefly was pretty much twice as good as the standard Sherman.

            I wonder if anyone's still reading this? Anyway:

            Germans:
            75mm L/70 std ammo-----------100-120mm
            special ammo-------150mm
            88mm L/56 std ammo-----------90-110mm
            special ammo-------140mm
            75mm L/48 std ammo-----------80-100mm

            The 75 L/70 was the Panther gun, the 88 L/56 the Tiger VIE and the 75mm L/48 late-model Pz IVs and StuGs. A factor with the german guns was that the special ammo requires tungsten for the ballistic caps which was non-existent by late '44, so only the standard results apply.

            The real monster guns were the JagdPanther (88 L/71) and JagdTiger (128mm) guns:

            128mm L/55 std ammo---------145mm
            special-------------245mm
            88mm L/71 std ammo-----------140-160mm
            special------------190mm

            As for the Russians, they started the war with the best AT gun but by 1944 were left trailing with their 2 main guns, the 76.2 fitted to mid-war T-34s and the 85mm of the later KVs and T-34s (50mm and 100mm armour penetration respectively). The American 75mm was much the same as the British, their 76mm was comparable with the results of the 6-pdr and the 90mm of the Pershing was similar to the 17-pdr.

            The only person sad enough to have read this far has to be FMK, if he's still out there
            http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.ph...ory:Civ2_Units

            Comment


            • But what is that special apds ammo for the Firefly?
              It allows penetration almost as a Jagtiger.

              How many milimeters(that is what mm stands for right? ) is the 17pdr?

              i was never good with ammo types(or any other technical stuff for that matter).



              And perhaps these numbers are good in theory but not on the field.

              And anyway these numbers come from a brit.
              "Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII

              All those who want to die, follow me!
              Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.

              Comment


              • Additional Information

                (1) 1 Unit is equivalent to 1 company
                I´m planning to do this scenario with one company/squadron represented by one units.

                Germany: 1. Fallschirm Armee - 60 units
                II. SS Panzer Korps - 102 units

                Allies: XVIII Airborne Corps (US) - 34 units
                I Airborne Corps (UK) - 18 units
                XXX Corps - 96

                Attached you´ll find my OOB for both sides, Allies and Germans. Please note that this mus not be the last version. I also want to simulate the Allied superiority concerning combat strenght; therefore the Allied Squadrons of the XXX Corps will consist of two units instead of one unit for the germans.

                (2) Gameplay
                Totalling 162 german and 148 allied units so far. if you like I can post my OOB. The other elements of the 2nd British Army will be represented by a single not moveable unit to force the player to use its forces wise. Reinforcements will arrive via events/research and by meeting the objectives in time. I´m thinking to realise this combining elements of Nemo´s Second Front, FmK´s Stalingrad and curtsibling´s amazing Dictator scenarios.

                The Germans will also receive reinforcements but this equipment and these troops won´t be crack troops as the 1st Parachute Army and the 2nd SS Panzer Korps.

                Now I´ll have some sleep, Good night everybody!
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • And the XXX corps, will it be controlled by the player?
                  "Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII

                  All those who want to die, follow me!
                  Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Palaiologos
                    But what is that special apds ammo for the Firefly?
                    It allows penetration almost as a Jagtiger.
                    apds stands for 'armour piercing discarding sabot' or sabot for short. Modern AT rounds are derived from this Brit invention, but they are tipped with depleted Uranium rather than tungsten I won't bore you with the details of what sabot is but it effectively allows the round to travel much faster through the air. Every Firefly tank had 5 or 10 sabot rounds which they saved for Panthers and Tigers, allowing virtual certainty of a kill if they fired first and hit the target. Trouble was they were sat in a Sherman, so every round the Germans got on target was also a kill. The down-side of apds is it's slightly less accurate than non-discarding rounds

                    How many milimeters(that is what mm stands for right? ) is the 17pdr?
                    If you mean gun calibre, then 76.2mm (3 inches)

                    And perhaps these numbers are good in theory but not on the field.
                    What holds in theory also holds in the field, in this case. Obviously the ranges and apparent armour slope vary enormously in practice, but the 17-pdr was still a better anti-tank gun than the Panther or Tiger VIE guns. The Germans new it too, and would always fire on Fireflies first, leaving the ineffectual 75mm Shermans for later. The Firefly may have had the better gun, but on balance the Panther was a much better tank. It's gun was able to penetrate any Sherman at decent distances and its thick, well-sloped armour made it impervious to standard Shermans at anything above point blank range. Same holds for the Tiger, but more so in terms of it's side and rear armour.

                    And anyway these numbers come from a brit.
                    Shame on you I wouldn't let my nationality alter the facts
                    http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.ph...ory:Civ2_Units

                    Comment


                    • Soooo that's what sabot is. I kept seeing it in front of me at all those wargames.

                      I have heard that Germans would target fireflies first, before, but never knew exactly why.

                      Now i know.
                      You learn something new everyday as the old proverb goes.
                      "Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII

                      All those who want to die, follow me!
                      Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.

                      Comment


                      • Jim, just read your OOB and I think the post about British UK unit nomenclature was confusing. This may clarify, giving the equivalents for tanks, infantry and artillery:

                        Tanks: Infantry: Artillery:

                        Brigade = Brigade = Brigade
                        Regiment = Battalion = Regiment
                        Squadron = Company = Battery
                        Troop = Platoon = Troop

                        Don't ask why it had to be this confusing, it's just a British thing, OK?

                        So, if you are using a scale of 1 civ unit = 1 (US) company, the equivalent british units are:

                        1 Company of infantry (4 rifle companies + support company in a battalion, 3 battalions in a Brigade)

                        1 Squadron of tanks (3 sqns in a regiment, 3 regiments in a brigade)

                        1 battery of artillery - this includes Achilles, AA, AT and RFA (4 batteries in a regiment, 2 regiments in a armoured division, 3 regiments in an infantry division)
                        http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.ph...ory:Civ2_Units

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by fairline
                          Shame on you I wouldn't let my nationality alter the facts




                          I would.
                          "Military training has three purposes: 1)To save ourselves from becoming subjects to others, 2)to win for our own city a possition of leadership, exercised for the benefit of others and 3)to exercise the rule of a master over those who deserve to be treated as slaves."-Aristotle, The Politics, Book VII

                          All those who want to die, follow me!
                          Last words of Emperor Constantine XII Palaiologos, before charging the Turkish hordes, on the 29th of May 1453AD.

                          Comment


                          • Jim, I've corrected the British part of your OOB:
                            Attached Files
                            http://sleague.apolyton.net/index.ph...ory:Civ2_Units

                            Comment


                            • fairline, some things I haven´t understood yet .....

                              First of all: another big huge "Thanks a lot, Gareth!"

                              Now the part mentioned in the headline of this post:

                              In german (as well as austrian) army organisation it looks like this: Company < Battalion < Regiment. Each Battalion consists of 3-5 companies "normal" infantry and one sKompanie ("s" = schwer = heavy; => "heavy Company"). A sKompanie has more menpower than a "normal" company and more firepower too. Is this the equivalent to the British heavy weapons company? If yes, how do you think that kind of unit should be represented???

                              And something you wrote into the OOB:

                              (1) 1 Dutch Armoured Brigade "Princess Irene" (3 regiments/9 squadrons) - Cromwell
                              How I shoudl understand this? (And don´t tell me that Cromwell was the name of its commander )

                              (2) 1 AT Regiment (2 batteries of 17-pdr towed + 2 batteries Achillies)
                              2 batteries Achilles Tank Destroyer means 2 Squadrons, right?

                              (3) 1 Airlanding Lt Regt = 3 batteries
                              The Airlanding Artilley were M8 75mm Pack Howitzers I think?!

                              (4) And last but not least: Do you know if the US Airborne Divisions had also some heavy company?
                              I´ve got this: 3 companies = 1 battalion, 3 battalions = 1 regiment.

                              This gives me the following stats: Germans - 162 units, Allies - 136 units (Market) and 117 units (Garden).

                              Attached my updated and upgraded OOB.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • Something I found out just seconds ago:

                                At the website http://www.stormpages.com/garyjkennedy/index.htm [this is a fantastic page about battalion organisations during WW2!!!) I found out that a British Parachute Battalion consisted of 3 Rifle Companies and some platoons (AT, mortar, signals, etc.) but I haven´t found a heavy weapons company.

                                Now my question to you (fairline): Do you think I should leave the heavy weapons company for the 1st Parachute Division out?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X