Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A GREAT looking new RPG: Lionheart!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A GREAT looking new RPG: Lionheart!

    GameSpot is the world's largest source for PS4, Xbox One, PS3, Xbox 360, Wii U, PS Vita, Wii PC, 3DS, PSP, DS, video game news, reviews, previews, trailers, walkthroughs, and more.


    (hopefully this Gamespot article will last for a while )

    Based on the Fallout 'SPECIAL' Engine.

    Basically a 16th Century Europe with magic. With historical characters and events . Coolness!

    Some quotes from the article:

    As if this unusual premise weren't intriguing enough, Lionheart will also feature the SPECIAL (strength, perception, endurance, charisma, intelligence, agility, luck) character system


    You will be able to choose from the following races: human, sylvant, feralkin, and demokin.


    you will have a more difficult time speaking with the Inquisition if you are not a pure-blooded human--especially if you're a feralkin--but these disadvantages are balanced with other abilities.


    We are going to be using other statistics to determine your mana statistics. The current model to determine mana uses your perception and charisma stats--perception allows you to attune yourself to the spirit, while charisma allows you to better impose your will on the spirit to tap its magical energy--although we are also considering tying endurance into the mana formula.


    Lionheart will have "classical European" monsters in place, rather than any inspired by independent works of literature like Tolkien's novels.


    The game revolves around you and your character, so you will not have a permanent party of characters. You will be able to recruit non-player characters to join with you for some quests.


    And the coolest:

    There will be many historical figures in the game, ranging from some very recognizable figures to others of medium to minor historical significance.


    One example of someone you could meet from real history is the Duke of Medina Sidonia, the historical commander of the Spanish Armada. If you join the Inquisition and earn the trust of the Inquisitors, you could gain an audience with the Grand Inquisitor himself. In addition to da Vinci and Galileo, you will also be able to meet Machiavelli, the Italian philosopher, and Cervantes, the Spanish author. All these characters are being scripted to reflect their historical personalities in some ways, but they will also be different because of the alternate timeline. The introduction of magic into the world has allowed some of these historical figures to live longer than their real historical counterparts. Also, there are some historical figures you can meet that will give you quests or join you for a time on your journey.


    and:

    Dialogue will also play an important role in the game. Like previous Black Isle RPGs, you will have the chance to drive the story with your character and choose your own path. It will be possible to pick dialogue options that will let you choose an evil path, a good path, or a path somewhere in between.


    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

  • #2
    Here is the BlackIsle website for it:

    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

    Comment


    • #3
      HOLY ****! HOLY ****! From the FAQ:

      Lionheart's temporary name was in fact Fallout Fantasy. So it was quite amusing to us when it was rumored to be a hack-n-slash PS2 game set in a post apocolyptic world with spells. It was called Fallout Fantasy just because that was a simple title that implied it used the SPECIAL system in a medieval setting. The presidential naming system was put in place by JE and only refers to titles developed in-house


      So this is Fallout 3 (kinda)
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment


      • #4
        You're a dirty spammer Imran
        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

        Comment


        • #5
          hmm, i know i should have made a thread when i first heard about this game...

          oh yeah -->
          <Kassiopeia> you don't keep the virgins in your lair at a sodomising distance from your beasts or male prisoners. If you devirginised them yourself, though, that's another story. If they devirginised each other, then, I hope you had that webcam running.
          Play Bumps! No, wait, play Slings!

          Comment


          • #6
            Nice to see Fallout Fantasy isn't an eastern style RPG after all. Shame they're still determined to get away from turn based combat, but it still looks impressive.
            To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
            H.Poincaré

            Comment


            • #7
              Lionheart is still making many people mad. They want Fallout 3. I'd really want Fallout 3. Unfortunantly, Interplay doesn't think there is a market for it and isn't willing to risk making one.
              "Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
              "At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
              "Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
              "In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd

              Comment


              • #8
                Not only do the fans want fallout 3, but also the creators want fallout 3, oh well, maybe after lionheart, when more people are familiar with the SPECIAL system, and now they can also try out realtime combat in combination with SPECIAL, and see how and if works.
                <Kassiopeia> you don't keep the virgins in your lair at a sodomising distance from your beasts or male prisoners. If you devirginised them yourself, though, that's another story. If they devirginised each other, then, I hope you had that webcam running.
                Play Bumps! No, wait, play Slings!

                Comment


                • #9
                  I've been reading the Lionheart message boards. I found something shockingly true:
                  TB people are happy because that is what the system was designed for. RT people are happy because they would not know right from wrong if it slapped in on the face.
                  Ok, I don't agree with it completely, but it is usually true.
                  "Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
                  "At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
                  "Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
                  "In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Problem is Fallout 1 and 2 didn't sell in sufficient quantity for Fallout 3 to be a "no brainer" despite all the accolades they won (being buggy on release probably didnt help.) I don't know if Fallout: Tactics did anything to change that. Until the beancounters reckon Fallout3 is a sound prospect I guess the fans and the developers who know how good it is will just have to wait. I keep my Mark II Power Armor clean, polished and fully serviced in anticipation.
                    To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
                    H.Poincaré

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Apocalypse

                      Ok, I don't agree with it completely, but it is usually true.
                      Why not allow the player to choose RT or TB? Would it be to much of an effort from the creators?
                      It's candy. Surely there are more important things the NAACP could be boycotting. If the candy were shaped like a burning cross or a black man made of regular chocolate being dragged behind a truck made of white chocolate I could understand the outrage and would share it. - Drosedars

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        there is a big difference between RT and TB, you can implement TB with a single thread, while for RT you'll most likely need multiple threads. Now that they've already chosen for RT, and the game is half finished (i think), it's a big change to also allow TB.
                        <Kassiopeia> you don't keep the virgins in your lair at a sodomising distance from your beasts or male prisoners. If you devirginised them yourself, though, that's another story. If they devirginised each other, then, I hope you had that webcam running.
                        Play Bumps! No, wait, play Slings!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Interplay doesn't want to spend any resources whatsever in TB. I actually like RT combat in X-COM Apocalypse better, but I would hate to see combat in Fallout or Jagged Alliance in Real Time.
                          "Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
                          "At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
                          "Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
                          "In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I didnt fine comb the review but I would have hoped that they had learned from FO:T that the mixed modes kept everyone satisfied. Its much better than spacebarring every two picoseconds like you have to do in Baldurs Gate 2 when your peeps are proving hard to control in a massive battle.
                            To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
                            H.Poincaré

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Many people I talked too seem very disappointed with the TB combat in FO:T. It was barely tested before the game was shipped.
                              "Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
                              "At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
                              "Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
                              "In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X