Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This math question can't be very hard, right?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Big Crunch
    The increase is what Asher wrote. The cumulative increase is what you have written. Not sure which Monk was after though.
    Well, he wrote total increase...

    Comment


    • #17
      Edit:

      Actually that was wrong and forever immortalised in the following post.
      Last edited by Dauphin; April 14, 2003, 19:46.
      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Big Crunch
        SUM(n from 0 to 9)(1.15n) - SUM(n from 0 to 9)(1)


        or

        1/r[1 + 1/(1-r)n]

        Where r is the % increase each year and n is the number of years.
        Please be merciful with me, it's 1:45am, and I have digged my formula books very deep under.

        Comment


        • #19
          Okay, I'm sorry if I've been unclear on some points. The task was to compare the 1978 and 1987 numbers - that is, to find out how many percent constituted the total increase from 1978 to 1987 assuming a 15% increase every year. I think the answer would have to be 22.5%.

          Comment


          • #20
            I assumed what he was looking for was equivalent to compound interest...

            I don't know if that's what he's looking for, but that's how I interpreted it.
            "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
            Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

            Comment


            • #21
              1
              11
              21
              1211
              111221
              312211
              13112221
              1113213211
              31131211131221
              way too classic by now

              Comment

              Working...
              X