Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lieberman to push bill extending benefits to gay federal employees

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lieberman to push bill extending benefits to gay federal employees

    for Mr. Fun



    WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Lieberman said Monday that he will push a Senate bill that would extend benefits to partners of gay federal employees.

    The legislation would give domestic partners the same benefits available to spouses of federal employees, including life and health insurance, retirement pay and compensation for on-the-job injuries. Domestic partners could be gay or straight, as long as they file an affidavit saying they are living together in a committed, intimate relationship, but are not married.

    The legislation was introduced last year by Minnesota's Democratic Sens. Mark Dayton and Paul Wellstone, who died last fall in a plane crash. Lieberman, who is running for president, said he will pick up where Wellstone left off in pressing for the bill.

    The measure must be reintroduced in this session of Congress. It will be referred to the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, where Lieberman is the ranking Democrat, but it faces long odds in the Republican-controlled Congress.

    "If it doesn't get done in the next two years, I intend to introduce and sign it as president of the United States," Lieberman said in a speech to the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism.

    Lieberman is one of nine Democrats seeking the presidency. One of his opponents, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, was a co-sponsor of the legislation. Another candidate, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, signed a civil union bill that allows gay couples to receive all the rights available to married couples under state law.

    Lieberman told the audience that although tremendous progress in civil rights has been made in the last 40 years, much work is unfinished. He called for an end to racial profiling, support for affirmative action, equal pay for women and protection of abortion rights.

    "Conservative politicians -- and indeed conservative political leaders with all due respect -- have no monopoly on moral values," he said.

    Separately, the Lieberman campaign announced Monday that it will operate from dual headquarters -- one in the Washington suburb of Arlington, Virginia, and another in Hartford, Connecticut. The campaign also includes offices in early primary states of New Hampshire, Iowa and South Carolina and fund-raising offices in Florida, California and New York.

    The Dean campaign, meanwhile, announced that its manager, Rick Ridder, is stepping down as of April 15, leaving the position vacant for now. Ridder will return to his Denver home and his firm will continue to consult for Dean's candidacy, the campaign said in a statement.

  • #2
    Re: Lieberman to push bill extending benefits to gay federal employees

    Originally posted by korn469
    for Mr. Fun
    Is he banned?
    I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
    For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

    Comment


    • #3
      i don't think so

      i just thought he'd enjoy reading it

      Comment


      • #4
        Ah.
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment


        • #5
          trying to ease his image as a moderate in hopes of winning the nomination i see
          "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

          "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

          Comment


          • #6
            he's probably already read the article, but maybe he has some insight on it

            since it applies to both straight and gay couples I don't see any problem with this legislation, and it sounds like a fair way to handle this

            Comment


            • #7
              I think they should follow the civil union model and tax gay couples the same way they do married hetero couples.
              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

              Comment


              • #8
                Just more proof that the ZOG and the Gay Mafia are in cahoots...
                KH FOR OWNER!
                ASHER FOR CEO!!
                GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  dinodoc, i dont think any gay people would complain if they got the same benefits as married hetero couples
                  "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                  'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We're getting Civil Unions over here.

                    And of course you wouldn't see the Republicans pushing anything like this? Why should filthy homos be anything but second-class citizens?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by red_jon
                      We're getting Civil Unions over here.

                      And of course you wouldn't see the Republicans pushing anything like this? Why should filthy homos be anything but second-class citizens?
                      And yet another unfair attack by somebody who doesn't even live here. I'm a Republican, you sh*thead, and I support this proposal (always have), so why don't you take your goddamned prejudices and shut up?

                      Yes, I edited this so I wouldn't get banned. So sue me.
                      Last edited by JohnT; April 2, 2003, 08:25.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by red_jon
                        We're getting Civil Unions over here.
                        Since when

                        If you mean Ken Livingstones little ceremonies then you might be dissapointed, they will carry no weight with the courts.

                        Eventually ther may be some legislation of what happens to pensions and other assetts of people in long term relationshios when someone dies nut civil unions won't get through teh Hosue of lords or past the daily mail brigade
                        Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
                        Douglas Adams (Influential author)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          John T - the Republican administration is NOT big on gay rights - in fact, the only reason gay people haven't had it worse is becasue Cheney's daughter is gay.
                          And your 'you don't live here, you don't know' argument is pathetic. I get American news channels, and American TV, etc all the time. Do you work in the White House? How would you know infimnitely more about the political system than a non-American? Dumbass.


                          And Stinger - the Labour Govt is bringing in a lot of new legislation - aimed at both altering what constitutes 'gross idecency' and idecent behavour in public and introducing legal Civil Unions for couples of the same sex.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            And the Lords can only block things for a year anyway

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by red_jon
                              And the Lords can only block things for a year anyway
                              not quite. they can block legislation intorduced in the commons indefinately. However after the third refusal the commons can wait a yera and use the parlaiment act to force through the legislation. they are reluctant to do this. further if the legisltion is introduced in the Lords ny way of an amendmanet tagged onto another bill then
                              the commons cannot overule the Lords.

                              In the near future there is not likely to be legislation to put unmarried couples(gay or straight) ont he same footing as married ones.
                              Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
                              Douglas Adams (Influential author)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X