Will Iraq cause an ecological disaster?

[Dis]

Or if you believe the U.S. is the cause of all these problems. Will the U.S. cause an ecological disaster?

Some news sources say that the oil wells are rigged to blow. They say this would be much worse than the Kuwaiti situation 12 years ago.

Will it happen?

[badman]

If America attacks, it's definitely going to happen.
I won't blame anyone for that but if I was getting conquered I also would try to leave no resources for my attacker (just like the Russians did in WWII).

[General Ludd]

Deffinately.


War generally is, anyways.

[Arrian]

Given what was done last time around, I think so, yeah. It's a little different since this would involve Saddam blowing up his own countries' oil wells instead of Kuwait's, but if he thinks he has nothing to lose, he might do it just out of spite.

-Arrian

[Edan]

He might also try to launch missiles at oil wells in neighboring countries.

[Andrew1999]

I remember reading somewhere that if one supertanker is sunk in the right place in Hormuz, the whole Gulf will be shut off. Is it really that narrow or is this just some hyperbole? If Saddam really wants to ruin the Gulf oil industry, it might be worth a try.

[Dis]

hmm good question.

I was never top side when we passed through the straights of Hormuz. I'm not sure.

[Flubber]

Blowing up his own wells is a strong possibility but I con't think he would be targetting other countries oil WELLS. These would be incredibly small targets. What he might try to hit are the refineries and storage areas-- There could be quite a firestorm.

[Dis]

I doubt he will do that. Remember he is playing a game and trying to look like the good guy. He has done this well over the past 12 years.

He can get away with blowing up his own wells. As that will be blamed on the U.S. anyways.

But if he went blowing up other's wells he would lose support he has in the middle east. He is pretty popular because he stands up against the U.S. He would lose that popularity.

Granted it doesn't mean as much if he is dead. But I think he will survive. And what happens to him afterwords depends on his popularity and sentiment against or for him.

[RGBVideo]

I remember reading somewhere that if one supertanker is sunk in the right place in Hormuz, the whole Gulf will be shut off. Is it really that narrow or is this just some hyperbole? If Saddam really wants to ruin the Gulf oil industry, it might be worth a try.

Evildoers don't care from our nature.

I doubt he will do that. Remember he is playing a game and trying to look like the good guy. He has done this well over the past 12 years.

He can get away with blowing up his own wells. As that will be blamed on the U.S. anyways.

But if he went blowing up other's wells he would lose support he has in the middle east. He is pretty popular because he stands up against the U.S. He would lose that popularity.

I agree here.

[DanS]

It would be incredibly easy for Hussein to really destroy Iraq through sabotaging its oil wells.

First off, consider that Kuwait had about 1,000 wells total. I'm guessing that Iraq has about 10x that (WAG).

Secondly, Iraq's wells have very high gas pressure. Much higher than Kuwait's. This means that it would be much, much tougher to put out the fire on an Iraqi well. Even then, it would much easier to damage the oil fields.

Third, Iraq's wells are spread out more than Kuwait's wells. This means that the pace of putting out the fires would be slower.

Lastly, most of Iraq's wells would spew toxic substances. This would slow the operation down even more and would create more environmental damage.

In short, Hussein's name would blacken the history books forever, if he blew up his wells.

[General Ludd]

He didn't just blow up the oil wells, you know. He also dumped reserves into the sea.

[SlowwHand]

Originally posted by Osweld
Deffinately.


War generally is, anyways.

True. War is not enviroment friendly.

[Andrew1999]

Originally posted by Tuomerehu

Evildoers don't care from our nature.

I didn't think he'd do it out of respect for the environment but out of efficiency. Why waste TNT blowing up wells one at a time when you can cripple 7 economies with one blow?

All this was brought on by an article a few years ago when Iran bought some submarines and antiship missiles and mounted them near the strait. If somehow naval access to the Gulf could be completely blocked that would be an incredible disaster. All the ships and troops there would be cut off too (I doubt we could supply the entire Allied Gulf force by air.)

[Sava]

I think the chances of Saddam lighting his wells are about 50/50. I'm not going to pick one. I had heard they were wired. But the bombing campaign will first take out telecommunications so Saddam's ability to order their destruction will be obstructed.