Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So, why is Saddam destroying his missiles but not his anthrax?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So, why is Saddam destroying his missiles but not his anthrax?

    I believe I know, but I'm wondering how people will respond.
    Long time member @ Apolyton
    Civilization player since the dawn of time

  • #2
    I have no doubt he will.
    justice is might

    Comment


    • #3
      "no doubt" -why so sure?
      Long time member @ Apolyton
      Civilization player since the dawn of time

      Comment


      • #4
        Because he hasn't got any and all those chemical plants were just an attempt by Saddam to find a cure for cancer and therby unite the world under his beneficent magnificance.

        The missles were part of his attempts to build an asteroid defence system, which he would eventuallt donate to the world in an attempt to promote his humanitarian views.
        Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
        Douglas Adams (Influential author)

        Comment


        • #5
          Long time member @ Apolyton
          Civilization player since the dawn of time

          Comment


          • #6
            Because then he wouldn't have any anthrax. I mean, duh.
            "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
            "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

            Comment


            • #7
              "I mean, duh" ...interesting
              Long time member @ Apolyton
              Civilization player since the dawn of time

              Comment


              • #8
                Lancer, of course he will destroy the anthrax. so he will destroy many more weapones, which they will accidentily find in some long forgotten camps somewhere in close future.
                wasn´t it the US admin permanently telling Saddam is playing games? now, this is the game he´s playing. the UN seems to like this game since it keeps the peace in ME and it disarms Iraq. no need to hurry.
                justice is might

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well, Saddam - Anthrax = Anthraxless Saddam.
                  "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
                  "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    He'll do this in the close future? Why? I mean its been, what, 12 years? Something like that. Fourteen resolutions of the irresolute UN, yes? So, why now? Or "in the close future"?

                    Stefu, you sound like you're in government...
                    Long time member @ Apolyton
                    Civilization player since the dawn of time

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      He already destroyed it. Some recently discovered paperwork supporting this fact is being created even as we speak.
                      "Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
                      "I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
                      "Stuie is right...." - Guynemer

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        the UN isn´t irresolute at all here. Blix actually disarms Iraq in the light of the publicity. this hasn´t been tried 12 years before. but it seems to work.
                        justice is might

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          So, Blix is disarming Iraq, and to do this he's using "the light of publicity". This "hasn't been tried in 12 years but seems to work".

                          This 'Blix' of which you speak, he is a Superman?

                          Just kidding, sorry.

                          Stuie, I'm sure if he could get away with that he would.
                          Long time member @ Apolyton
                          Civilization player since the dawn of time

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Lancer
                            This 'Blix' of which you speak, he is a Superman?
                            if he finally prevents Bush from attacking, definetly.
                            justice is might

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ...Anthrax?

                              How easily the West misinterprets Saddam's innovative method of delivering water to isolated Shia and Kurdish villages via specially-adapted artillery shells.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X