Tweet
Pick a card, any card....
-
One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry. -
Well, if you don't count violating 17 UN resolutions, gassing 30,000 people, the outright disapearence of 500,000 others (according to US lackeys Amesty International), state authorized torture, state authorized rape, attempting to aquire NBC weapons...Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Personally, he has a point. The only crime Hussein is guilty of is he is no longer a US lackey.
Yes, he's as innocent as the day is long, why can't Bush see it?I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
i'm an ignorant greek...MarkGComment
-
I pick that one!I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
-
dealer busts. looks like you win again.Originally posted by DinoDoc
I pick that one!"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott CardComment
-
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
-
Thats good enough reason for me.Originally posted by UberKruX
and besides. we'd have to lose to be tried. thats how it works
:-pComment
-
I'm not sure that is true. Presumably if the US attacked without UN sanction and committed govt sanctioned war crimes while attacking Iraq, Bush could be accused of war crimes and tried in absentia (if he didn't give himself up).Originally posted by UberKruX
and besides. we'd have to lose to be tried. thats how it works
I agree that it is a bit silly to claim that Bush has committed war crimes, but that doesn't make what he is doing right. And I think the way the Afghani captives are being treated doesn't say much for the US sense of 'morality'.
In fact, if I were an arab, I would feel more inclined to fight against the US now than I would have a year ago.Comment
-
And I'm sure that Americans are more inclined to fight then they would have before 9/11
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Great, each side more riled up. Exactly what the terrorists wanted in the first place.
One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
we're not systematically killing the captured afgahnis.
in fact, they thought enough about it to not put them on US soil, because they knew sh*t would go down.
i dont know how well you want the prisioners to be treated, but you front the money for it and we'll talk."I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott CardComment
-
Please don´t misunderstand me but I see no justification for this war.
Well, how many have been violated by other nations? (I exactly know - as all of you - that you expect me to blame Israel. I won´t do this.Well, if you don't count violating 17 UN resolutions
No, counting the failures of each other leads nowhere. Look into the Bible. No, I just cannot understand your American way of Morality. To me it seems ... I don´t know, ridiculous is not the right word ....
... let me think, strange. I guess this is the word. Strange.
Well, I think strange fits the term.
This I know. I have never stated that War itself is a crime. The thing to mention about this is the way to discuss about it. Some US hubris is there. You just stated it. I don´t think I shall add something more than your statement .....nuremberg was a WAR CRIMES tribunal WAR is not a WAR CRIME. subtle difference.
This Pseudo-Morality I do not want and need. The last two I could read in various US-American Newspapers and Magazines that Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld is not really happy of Germany because Schröder doesn´t want to go to war.and besides. we'd have to lose to be tried. thats how it works
Only - I guess - 3 to 4 days ago I also read that America is proud about its "Reeducation" of Germany to a peaceful and peaceloving nation after WW2. Personally I wish the US the same education.
I never understood the meaning of the following proverb: "If you have drawn your sword, you must use it."
Now I do. As a Post-WW2 European I ever thought of putting the sword besides whenever possible. Now I understand the proverb. I wish the best to the US in its war against Iraq. I won´t shed a single tear after Saddam but the US also knows that this is a war Bush can never justify (by now).
I am against this war. I would wish all the people that the Earth will be more safe after Gulf War III. And this is some "...re-run of a bad movie Í am sick and tired to watch again". I doubt that our planet will be more peaceful and safer after. Have Fun, all you warmongering and dumb people. A war cannot be fought without losses/casualties. I think it won´t matter how many tons TNT the US will drop on Iraq, but I think it will matter how many US Soldiers will lose their lives in this war. Good Luck for your Re-election, Mr Bush. I hope that America is not that stupid to elect you again (maybe this time with a majority of the votes .....)Comment
-
last time i checked, america hadn't gassed and cremated people wholesale.Can anyone out there explain to me why the US-led Military Tribunal accused and convicted/sentenced the elite of the 3rd Reich for planning and preparing a war of aggression, for the realization of a war of aggression and Crimes against Humanity and now the US is doing exact the same things.
because the outcome of the war isn't known yet, and the winner is the one who gets to pick who gets put on trial.To me this is completely confuse and I cannot understand this. An attack on Iraq is not to justify. Why the US Government is not accused in The Hague for these reasons?B♭3Comment
-
Re: Can someone tell me what Nuremberg was for?
Originally posted by jim panse
US-led Military Tribunal US-led? Well, only if you ignore those other three countries...
"I read a book twice as fast as anybody else. First, I read the beginning, and then I read the ending, and then I start in the middle and read toward whatever end I like best." - Gracie AllenComment
-
Which of those resolutions were passed under Chapter 7 of the UN charter?Originally posted by jim panse
Well, how many have been violated by other nations?"I read a book twice as fast as anybody else. First, I read the beginning, and then I read the ending, and then I start in the middle and read toward whatever end I like best." - Gracie AllenComment
-
What drugs are you on?Originally posted by jim panse
Well, how many have been violated by other nations? (I exactly know - as all of you - that you expect me to blame Israel. I won´t do this.
No, counting the failures of each other leads nowhere. Look into the Bible. No, I just cannot understand your American way of Morality. To me it seems ... I don´t know, ridiculous is not the right word .... ... let me think, strange. I guess this is the word. Strange.
Well, I think strange fits the term.
Seriously, invoking "war crimes" because you don't agree with another Gulf War just makes you look silly. Worse, you trivialise the seriousness of the term 'war crimes'. Comparing a terribly one-sided war that hasn't happened yet with victors of war impaling/torturing/murdering/eviscerating/gasing innocent civilians makes you look like a complete tool. Get some therapy
Comment
Comment