Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

14 years in an Iraqi prison for selling a roll of film

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 14 years in an Iraqi prison for selling a roll of film







    14 years of torture and humiliation in Saddam's jail
    By Anthony Loyd
    Our correspondent meets a Baghdad camera shop owner who sold a roll of film to a British journalist and paid for it with his freedom



    RAFAT Abdulmajeed Muhammad is a slightly built man of 45 with a distant stare and a scarred body. He lives alone in Sulaimaniyah, northern Iraq, and owns nothing but the clothes he stands in. He spends his days trying to forget the past 14 years, which he spent in the darkness of Saddam Hussein’s most infamous political prison.
    Mr Muhammad’s only crime was to sell a British journalist a roll of film, but his treatment bears ample testimony to the nature of Saddam’s regime.

    Mr Muhammad was an Egyptian photography graduate who moved to Iraq in 1985 and opened a small photographic shop, Rafat’s Photography, in Baghdad. In August 1989 a foreigner visited his shop and bought a roll of film. Mr Muhammad gave him his business card and forgot about him.

    The next month he encountered the man again, this time in very different circumstances. Mr Muhammad, who had been arrested the previous day and charged with espionage, was sitting blindfolded in a chair in Room 18 of the headquarters of the Iraqi secret police, the Mukhabarat.

    “They pulled the blindfold up so that I could see the spy I was accused of aiding,” he said. “There, standing in silence, was the man to whom I had sold a roll of film. His name was Farzad Bazoft. The Mukhabarat had found my business card in his belongings.”

    Mr Muhammad never saw Mr Bazoft again. The Iranian-born journalist, who was working for The Observer, was executed for spying the following March.

    The Mukhabarat never extracted a verbal confession from Mr Muhammad during the four months he was held in a tiny cell in the headquarters. He said that he was interrogated by a Mukhabarat officer named Basim twice a day, each time being whipped with cables while suspended from the ceiling, his hands tied behind his back. He had his jaw, ribs and hands broken. Sometimes he was taken to the basement, strapped into an electric chair and given shock treatment.

    “I had nothing to confess to,” he said. “They said I worked for Mossad (the Israeli intelligence agency) but my only mistake was that I sold Bazoft a roll of film.”

    In January 1990, days before Mr Muhammad’s trial, the Mukhabarat inked his thumb and pressed it against a statement in lieu of a signature. He was charged under article 158 of Iraqi law and sentenced by a military court to life imprisonment. He was transferred to the notorious Abu Greeb penitentiary, west of Baghdad, where 7,000 political prisoners lived in constant fear of torture and execution.

    He spent the next three years in solitary confinement. He was taken out of his cell twice a week for beatings. He said that in the prison basement were deep pits, each a metre wide. Up to ten prisoners deemed guilty of disciplinary offences would be dropped into these pits and kept there for a week at a time. “Many died in those pits,” he said.

    Last summer Mr Muhammad had the top joint of the second finger of his left hand smashed off with an iron bar for insulting Saddam, an offence for which five years were added to his sentence.

    Large-scale executions were a regular occurrence. The first that Mr Muhammad remembered was on March 27, 1991, during the uprisings in Iraq that followed the coalition victory in Kuwait.

    “There was no rioting in the prison, just a feeling of unease,” he said. “Then that day hundreds of men from a special unit arrived. They took all the prisoners from their cells and made them parade in the yard facing the walls. It was the first time I had been in daylight since my imprisonment.When we all had our backs to them, standing in the sun, they opened fire on us. Over a hundred men lay dead and dying. The rest of us were made to stand up again and they kept us paraded there until 8pm, when we were returned to our cells.”

    Mr Muhammad had some notable companions in Abu Greeb, and their identity sheds light on the broad interpretation of “political prisoner” in Iraq. In a neighbouring cell during his first year of solitary confinement was Hussain al-Shahristani, an internationally renowned Iraqi expert on neutron activity. He had been imprisoned for refusing to co-operate on Saddam’s nuclear programme.

    “We used to whisper to each other through the doors of our cells when the guards were eating their supper,” Mr Muhammad said. “We even made a plan, through one of the men who gave us meals, to bribe the Mukhabarat and escape.”

    He later found himself rubbing shoulders with seven Iraqi al- Qaeda inmates. “Their chief was Dr Mohammad,” he said. “He was an Iraqi from Mosul who had fought in Afghanistan and was a personal friend of Osama bin Laden. We became very close. I remember him praying specially for Osama when the Americans began to attack Afghanistan.” The seven al-Qaeda prisoners received special privileges. Dr Mohammad was allowed a bed and a private room in which to meet his wife and “special visitors”.

    On October 20 last year, 400 prisoners were taken out before dawn and marched to a field inside the Abu Greeb complex, where they were shot.

    “In a way it was good news for us,” Mr Muhammad said. “Though executions happened the whole time, usually mass killings preceeded an amnesty. It was a way the authorities had of culling the prison population. So that morning, after the shooting, we hoped some of us may be freed.”

    An immediate amnesty announcement did indeed follow. Along with 2,000 other prisoners from Abu Greeb, many of them Kurds, Mr Muhammad was simply ejected from the gates that afternoon.

    He had no money and no documentation. He had no idea where to go. He had no idea of the fate, or whereabouts, of his two brothers and two sisters in Egypt. In the end, some Kurds took him northwards and he crossed into Kurdish- controlled northern Iraq two days later. There local people put him up in a small, spartan hotel in the centre of Sulaimaniyah.

    The local branch of the UN and the Red Cross appeared unwilling or unable to help him. “They were polite but firm,” he said. “They told me I was a released prisoner so was out of their jurisdiction.”

    He sits alone in his bare room, waiting, and hoping that something will happen to change things.

    “I am surprised to hear of all the anti-war demonstrations in the West,” he said. “I wish that the demonstrators could spend just 24 hours in the place I have come from and see the reality of Iraq.

    “Fourteen lost years of my life. Nothing but bread for food — darkness, filth, beatings, torture, killings, bitterness and humiliation. I wish they could experience it for just 24 hours.”

    Killed for 'spying'

    In 1989 Farzad Bazoft, an Iranian-born freelance journalist, was working for The Observer. Having established close links with the Iraqi Embassy in London, Mr Bazoft was invited to cover a showpiece election in Kurdistan.

    While he was in Iraq, news broke of an explosion at a secret missile plant to the south of Baghdad. Defying an official ban, Mr Bazoft went to the site disguised as a doctor. He was driven by his friend Daphne Parish, a British nurse. While there, he took photos and two soil samples, which he believed would show that the site was contaminated. When Mr Bazoft attempted to leave Iraq he was arrested by the secret police and put into solitary confinement for six weeks. When he emerged he was shown in a televised interview confessing to being an Israeli spy.

    On March 10, 1990, Mr Bazoft was convicted of spying and sentenced to death. Ms Parish was jailed for 15 years but released after ten months. Despite appeals from Margaret Thatcher, the British Prime Minister, Mr Bazoft was hanged on March 15 on the orders of Saddam Hussein.

  • #2
    I don't see the point of posting more of the same. We all know Hussein is a nasty bastard.
    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah, post more about Bush. Some of us aren't convinced yet.
      “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
      "Capitalism ho!"

      Comment


      • #4
        what about china? id like to hear accounts of their jailing of political dissidents.
        "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
        'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

        Comment


        • #5
          There are no political dissidents jailed in China.
          “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
          "Capitalism ho!"

          Comment


          • #6
            Yes, they are all dead.
            (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
            (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
            (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Urban Ranger
              I don't see the point of posting more of the same. We all know Hussein is a nasty bastard.
              Hussein isnt a nasty bastard. my ex-boss was a nasty bastard. Several people i know are nasty bastards. Saddam is a brutal, genocidal, totalitarian dictator - probably the worst on the planet at this time.


              Now you may not feel that is relevant to the issue of war and peace. But saying "we all know he's a bad man" triviliazes the plight of the Iraqi people.
              "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Urban Ranger
                Yes, they are all dead.
                That explains your overwhelming desire to be an apologist for the PRC. You poor sod.
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Urban Ranger
                  I don't see the point of posting more of the same. We all know Hussein is a nasty bastard.
                  Amazingly, as you can see, this is an untrue observation.
                  Go figure, huh ?
                  Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                  "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                  He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by lord of the mark


                    Hussein isnt a nasty bastard. my ex-boss was a nasty bastard. Several people i know are nasty bastards. Saddam is a brutal, genocidal, totalitarian dictator - probably the worst on the planet at this time.


                    Now you may not feel that is relevant to the issue of war and peace. But saying "we all know he's a bad man" triviliazes the plight of the Iraqi people.
                    And he always has been, since he (twice) assassinated his way into power. However, none of that was of any concern to the US when he was a useful counter against the Islamic Republic of Iran, so the US (with Rumsfeld as a special envoy) fast tracked Iraq back to normalized diplomatic relations (after they'd been broken off by Iraq in 1973), and engaged in overt and covert economic aid, provided intelligence data, and military coordination.

                    If the plight of the Iraqi people was a non-concern of the US for years up until 1991, then why should we give any credence to any suggestion that the plight of the Iraqi people is of concern now? The US has not made some fundamental policy shift renouncing ties to dictators who abuse human rights on a grand scale. In fact, it's the same old story of short term convenience, as shown be re-arming and supporting Rashid Dostum in Afghanistan - where he is defacto an indenpendent authority with no loyalty to the Afghan government, and his forces reputation for brutality equals or exceeds that of the Taleban - just the focus is different.

                    So yes, we know Hussein is a bastard, and a lot of other things, but it hardly behooves the US to get all sanctimonious about it now, unless there is that fundamental policy shift that we all know ain't about to happen.
                    When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat


                      And he always has been, since he (twice) assassinated his way into power. However, none of that was of any concern to the US when he was a useful counter against the Islamic Republic of Iran, so the US (with Rumsfeld as a special envoy) fast tracked Iraq back to normalized diplomatic relations (after they'd been broken off by Iraq in 1973), and engaged in overt and covert economic aid, provided intelligence data, and military coordination.

                      If the plight of the Iraqi people was a non-concern of the US for years up until 1991, then why should we give any credence to any suggestion that the plight of the Iraqi people is of concern now? The US has not made some fundamental policy shift renouncing ties to dictators who abuse human rights on a grand scale. In fact, it's the same old story of short term convenience, as shown be re-arming and supporting Rashid Dostum in Afghanistan - where he is defacto an indenpendent authority with no loyalty to the Afghan government, and his forces reputation for brutality equals or exceeds that of the Taleban - just the focus is different.

                      So yes, we know Hussein is a bastard, and a lot of other things, but it hardly behooves the US to get all sanctimonious about it now, unless there is that fundamental policy shift that we all know ain't about to happen.

                      Well since 9/11 we have reexamined our policy, and see things in a new light. Old policies didnt work.

                      BTW dostum is not at all like Saddam. Dostum is nasty bastard, not a totalitarian ruler like Saddam. That is precisely why posts like this are necessary - to make clear that Saddam is not just your garden variety thug.
                      And BTW, we are in the course of strengthening the Karzai govt, in order to weaken warlords like Dostum. Who, has established far better rule in Mazar than the Taliban
                      "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        He may be a son-of-a-*****, but he's not our son-of-a-*****.
                        Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by lord of the mark

                          Well since 9/11 we have reexamined our policy, and see things in a new light. Old policies didnt work.

                          BTW dostum is not at all like Saddam. Dostum is nasty bastard, not a totalitarian ruler like Saddam. That is precisely why posts like this are necessary - to make clear that Saddam is not just your garden variety thug.
                          And BTW, we are in the course of strengthening the Karzai govt, in order to weaken warlords like Dostum. Who, has established far better rule in Mazar than the Taliban
                          Doesn't seem much evidence of re-examination. We have overwhelming evidence of the Saudis looking the other way towards funding of terrorists, they're human rights abusers on a grand scale, and effectively a kleptocratic dictatorship, but they're still "allies."

                          Musharraf isn't all that bad of a guy (dictator that he is), he just looks the other way as much as he can at home-grown terrorist groups advancing Pakistanis goals with respect to Kashmir, and plays chicken with India - the highest probability nuclear conflict in the world today.

                          Most of our other "allies" in that part of the world are also monarchies or dictatorships, so "democracy" is of no real interest to us.

                          Dostum is a murdering butcher - ask the Hezara, or ethnic Pashtuns who happen to be up in his territory The only difference in Mazar-e-sharif is that the populace are primarily Dostum's people and ethnic Taijiks, who are the lowest priority targets for mistreatment. In other words, there just aren't as many people to rape, pillage and plunder as the Taleban had in Mazar, but put Dostum in Ghazny or Khowst, for example, and the history of his behavior indicates he'd be as bad or worse than the Taleban.

                          The "strengthening" of the Karzai government is to try to give it some stability and eventual ability to hold it's own against the Hekmatyar-Taleban-al Qaeda coalition around Khowst. The Karzai government doesn't concern itself with Dostum's fiefdom, and as long as they ignore each other, they get along - by essentially ignoring each other.

                          If you want to go for a "worst dictator" award, that one has to go without question to Dear Leader Kim, who is a far more potent threat than Saddam will ever be. What do we do? We treat Kim in a much different light than we treat Saddam, and we always will. A war with the DPRK, despite the desirability of reuniting the Koreas, saving the lives of the North Korean people, and ridding the world of Kim Jong Il, will be a bloodbath, pure and simple. So our "re-examined" policy is to go after chumps that can't put up a fight, and hope we can maybe talk and dance our way around larger threats.
                          When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I doubt that's the case.
                            Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                            "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                            He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat


                              And he always has been, since he (twice) assassinated his way into power. However, none of that was of any concern to the US when he was a useful counter against the Islamic Republic of Iran, so the US (with Rumsfeld as a special envoy) fast tracked Iraq back to normalized diplomatic relations (after they'd been broken off by Iraq in 1973), and engaged in overt and covert economic aid, provided intelligence data, and military coordination.

                              If the plight of the Iraqi people was a non-concern of the US for years up until 1991, then why should we give any credence to any suggestion that the plight of the Iraqi people is of concern now? The US has not made some fundamental policy shift renouncing ties to dictators who abuse human rights on a grand scale. In fact, it's the same old story of short term convenience, as shown be re-arming and supporting Rashid Dostum in Afghanistan - where he is defacto an indenpendent authority with no loyalty to the Afghan government, and his forces reputation for brutality equals or exceeds that of the Taleban - just the focus is different.

                              So yes, we know Hussein is a bastard, and a lot of other things, but it hardly behooves the US to get all sanctimonious about it now, unless there is that fundamental policy shift that we all know ain't about to happen.
                              Comeon Mike, you are better then these types of posts.

                              Of course the brutal nature of Saddam's regime is not the reason we are going into Iraq. But seeing the extent of Saddam's brutality can tell us it's not a bad th ing moving in to take him out. A lot of leftists are acting like we are about to do this horrible thing to the Iraqi people, or that is not our place to tell the Iraqis what type of government they have. However, Saddam is bad enough that it shows we would be helping the Iraqis if we removed their tyrant(so long as we handled the post-war situation well enough). Because there is no moral evil in disposing of Saddam, there is no moral reason not to follow our national interest in removing Saddam.
                              "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

                              "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X