Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who the hell is Rush Limbaugh ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Vesayen
    Limbaugh is a COMPLETE lunatic who sees elaborate conspiracies if anyone disagrees with his view point......the man is a borderline psychotic with delusions of grandeur(sp?)
    Who happens to make $10 mil per.

    ACK!
    Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Ned
      Donahue, a radical liberal, for example, was put on FOX only six months ago to counter Bill O'Reilly, a conservative. Donahue failed and has been cancelled.

      Donahue failed because he was by and large an unscrupulous jerk who cut his segments apart to change his guests words around.........while Limbaugh is a psychotic he isnt BAD(just very, very wrong), he isnt intentionally doing harmfull things, Donahue on the other hand is morally corrupt.


      Summary: Donahue failed because he was an unscrupulous animal and the moment he aired an interview, the interviewe, realizing the segment had been chopped up to twist his words, blacklisted him.

      Limbaugh isnt bad, just wrong.

      Comment


      • #18
        He makes fun of people, spreads mistruths, and pretends to be an expert on many things that he really isn't too knowledgable about. I don't find him funny, because he is so stupid that I can hardly listen too him for long.
        "When you ride alone, you ride with Bin Ladin"-Bill Maher
        "All capital is dripping with blood."-Karl Marx
        "Of course, my response to your Marx quote is 'So?'"-Imran Siddiqui

        Comment


        • #19
          Almost the same thing I said in regards to Mario Cuomo's radio show back in '95. Reading my mind, Duncan? (Perish the thought!)

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Tuberski


            Who happens to make $10 mil per.

            ACK!
            Plenty of rich people are crazy(and vice versa)

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Vesayen



              Donahue failed because he was by and large an unscrupulous jerk who cut his segments apart to change his guests words around.........while Limbaugh is a psychotic he isnt BAD(just very, very wrong), he isnt intentionally doing harmfull things, Donahue on the other hand is morally corrupt.


              Summary: Donahue failed because he was an unscrupulous animal and the moment he aired an interview, the interviewe, realizing the segment had been chopped up to twist his words, blacklisted him.

              Limbaugh isnt bad, just wrong.
              Vesayen, Limbaugh generally is entertainment. He tries to poke fun at liberals. However, I do admit that he is a lot less fun today than he used to be. I suspect his hearing problem may be a cause.
              http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Vesayen


                Plenty of rich people are crazy(and vice versa)
                True, but most don't get rich because of their "craziness."

                ACK!
                Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Is he widely watched in the country ?
                  I listen to him.
                  - Is his viewpoint considered reasonable by the right, or is he considered out of the loop ?
                  Reasonable. He has people who call in that are much more conservative then he is and he has people call in who are much more liberal (but still conservative) call in.
                  - Is he supported by any way by the Republicans or the White House ?
                  Not that I know of

                  - On which channel is he aired ?
                  560 AM (this is for everyone, right?)
                  - Does anyone here use him as his sole source of information, or consider him a reliable source of information ?
                  He is reliable. I would never use anything as a sole source. I am fairly liberal but listen to conservative talk shows. This show is more opinions and represents a conservative stance similar (probably a little further right) than Bush.
                  For your photo needs:
                  http://www.canstockphoto.com?r=146

                  Sell your photos

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I tried watching to Donahue. But I got bored because all he seemed to be about was knee-jerk liberalism and PC platitudes. I hadn't realized he was editing his guest's answers.

                    O'Reilly is a lot more entertaining.

                    Where is Geraldo Rivera when you need him? Let the chairs begin to fly and the broken noses bleed. Ah! Those were the days.

                    Well, Geraldo has joined FOX and you will find him right him right in the middle of the action giving very entertaining reports. I believe today he is reporting from Turkey.
                    http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Sheik


                      560 AM (this is for everyone, right?)
                      For me, it's 1200 WOAI.

                      ACK!
                      Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Tuberski


                        True, but most don't get rich because of their "craziness."

                        ACK!



                        Do I REALLY need to start listing celebrities who became so because they are nuts?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          One of many dumbass conservative whackos who has some stupid radio or cable TV show.
                          To us, it is the BEAST.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Vesayen
                            Do I REALLY need to start listing celebrities who became so because they are nuts?
                            Craziness is your definition of him, seems there are some people here that disagree with you psychological evaluation.

                            ACK!
                            Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Sava
                              One of many dumbass conservative whackos who has some stupid radio or cable TV show.
                              This getting close to a political thread, are you sure you want to be involved?



                              ACK!
                              Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                A thread about Rush Limbaugh turning into a political thread? I wonder about you sometimes Tuberski
                                To us, it is the BEAST.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X