Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iraq crisis: Historical precedents (worth a read)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Iraq crisis: Historical precedents (worth a read)

    For those who think that being informed is worthwhile, here's a good series of opinion pieces from the Guardian.

    All who wish to draw historical comparisons, especially those who rave on about "appeasement" please read this.

    Politicians on both sides of the argument over Iraq have been busy rummaging through the history books. But which is the more plausible parallel? Matt Seaton asked a dozen leading historians.
    Only feebs vote.

  • #2
    Already read it. Wasn't too impressed. If you examine 1936 instead of 1939, the similarities between Iraq and Germany are much more evident...
    KH FOR OWNER!
    ASHER FOR CEO!!
    GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      good reading. But I feel their opinions are biased on whether they support the war or not. I do not believe they can objectively look at history and the present situation with no bias.

      Simon Chama has it pretty close though. This doesn't resemble either 1939 or 1956. Terrorism makes this a unique situation.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
        Already read it. Wasn't too impressed. If you examine 1936 instead of 1939, the similarities between Iraq and Germany are much more evident...
        When were weapons inspectors an option in 1936?
        One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
          Already read it. Wasn't too impressed. If you examine 1936 instead of 1939, the similarities between Iraq and Germany are much more evident...
          Yes, one was a highly industrialized country with lots of financial capital. The other is a poverty stricken nation which only produces crude.

          One country was a leader in science. The other is a isn't. One country was historically one of the most powerful countries in the world. The other isn't.

          The similarities are so striking.
          Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
            Already read it. Wasn't too impressed. If you examine 1936 instead of 1939, the similarities between Iraq and Germany are much more evident...
            So do the Germany-USA comparisons.
            Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

            Do It Ourselves

            Comment


            • #7
              One of the things that is not often emphasised is the sympathy of European elites to Hitler in the 30s due to his anticommunist position. There is a nice novel which has this as the background, "The Remains of the Day", by Ishiguro.
              Only feebs vote.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Dissident
                good reading. But I feel their opinions are biased on whether they support the war or not. I do not believe they can objectively look at history and the present situation with no bias.

                Simon Chama has it pretty close though. This doesn't resemble either 1939 or 1956. Terrorism makes this a unique situation.
                Which facts do you dispute?
                Only feebs vote.

                Comment


                • #9
                  All of the direct historical comparisons read to me as rather simplistic, vague and easily manipulated. I'm sure we could compare the situation to any historical occurence if we wanted, to the limits of absurdity. Rather like making Nostradamus quatrains say what we want them to say.

                  I'd say the historical comparisons are inaccurate all-round, and this indeed a new and unique situation.
                  Tutto nel mondo è burla

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Boris Godunov
                    All of the direct historical comparisons read to me as rather simplistic, vague and easily manipulated. I'm sure we could compare the situation to any historical occurence if we wanted, to the limits of absurdity. Rather like making Nostradamus quatrains say what we want them to say.

                    I'd say the historical comparisons are inaccurate all-round, and this indeed a new and unique situation.
                    Pretty much, which is why I object to the pro-war camp going on like this.

                    Only feebs vote.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      All of the direct historical comparisons read to me as rather simplistic, vague and easily manipulated. I'm sure we could compare the situation to any historical occurence if we wanted, to the limits of absurdity. Rather like making Nostradamus quatrains say what we want them to say.

                      I'd say the historical comparisons are inaccurate all-round, and this indeed a new and unique situation.


                      Yep... which I why I'll never say whether or not this is 'appeasment'. That's totally silly to compare.
                      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Just because this isn't the same situation doesn't mean that there isn't a cause of war.

                        Some of the writers pointed out that there may be a reduction in WOMD and reduction in terrorism if this happens. They are unsure.

                        Many of them agree that the U.S. has no definite plans what to do once we are done. I fear to think what the aftermath of this will be.

                        but just because this isn't the same appeasement as what happened in the 30's is no reason to keep appeasing! What's the point of having U.N. resolution if they can be broken with no consequence?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Dissident
                          but just because this isn't the same appeasement as what happened in the 30's is no reason to keep appeasing! What's the point of having U.N. resolution if they can be broken with no consequence?
                          Iraq has been living with the consequences for 12 years. They were once on their way to being a first-world nation and had one of the largest militaries in the world. Now, thanks to the sanctions and containment, they are dirt poor, have no military hardly to speak of, don't even control their own skies nor a good portion of their country, and couldn't pose a serious threat to, well, pretty much anyone.
                          Tutto nel mondo è burla

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The US State Department just ordered all US citizens to leave Iraq, by the way.

                            **** is about to hit the fan.
                            We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by chegitz guevara


                              Yes, one was a highly industrialized country with lots of financial capital. The other is a poverty stricken nation which only produces crude.

                              One country was a leader in science. The other is a isn't. One country was historically one of the most powerful countries in the world. The other isn't.

                              The similarities are so striking.
                              But, Che, relative to his neighbors, Iraq with WoMD is the superpower of the region. Couple that with his past aggressive wars to solve border disputes (same as Hitler) he is guaranteed to cause havoc if we do nothing now and withdraw. In a short few years, we may be asked to go back to the region to confront an Iraqi regime bristling with nuclear and other WoMD.

                              Is that what you want?

                              The lesson of 1936-19 is that you have to stand firm and confront a growing menance. If you don't, the danger grows until putting it down become a f*ckin nightmare.
                              http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X