London £5 "Congestion Fee"

[DanS]

You ever driven into Manhattan?

How much do the tolls cost?

even if it does, the chances that it will make the tiniest difference: even slimmer

200 million+ GBP per annum is some real money! That could fund a lot of capital projects.

[Caesar the Great]

Jersey ---> Manhattan on the george washington bridge is now $6 i think

[Sten Sture]

easy money.

In San Fran it costs $5 to enter the city from the north via the Golden Gate Bridge. They just raised the toll from $3. Traffic is down about 3% from 42.2mm crossings to 40.7mm annually. If this is any indication London can look forward to enjoying 97% of the traffic they usually do!

again if SF is offers any pattern, then all of the money will go to the incompetent mayor so he can buy snazzy hats.

[FrustratedPoet]

Originally posted by DanS
200 million+ GBP per annum is some real money! That could fund a lot of capital projects.

I know you're very knowledgable about economics, but I can tell you don't live in England.

Seriously, far more money than that must have been poured down the bottomless pit of our transport services for years. So far things aren't looking too great.

[Buck Birdseed]

Originally posted by FrustratedPoet
Is this one of Red Ken's ideas?

Actually, in a somewhat ironic turn of events, it was actually Milton Friedman who came up with the idea first, back in the fifties.

[Felch]

Snappy is right. This is a libertarian idea.

[MOBIUS]

Personally I think it's a great idea being a Londoner - there will be teething problems at first, especially with the Central line currently not running.

Already there are an extra 300 buses on the streets of London and they have also been cracking down of cars driving in bus lanes. Now that we have a mayor again for London, it is great to see all the inertia of a lack of transport planning in London being gradually swept away.

As far as I'm concerned I can't see a reason for travelling into London by car at all - in the thirteen years I've had a licence, I would have only had to pay once or twice under today's new charges. Big deal!

The only people that are going to be hit are those that can afford the already high expense of running a car into the city and parking it - awww, how sad...

Besides, motorcycles are exempt so they can all buy scooters instead.

I'm hoping all the money will be ploughed back - it almost will have to in the beginning as London's already buckling public transport strains at this new burden.

But then given all the taxes we have to pay on running cars in this country, we should have the best transport system in the entire world...

[Felch]

The Tube sounds like an excellent system. In DC we've got a metro system that is good for hitting up touristy spots, but it doesn't cover much of the city, and isn't very extensive in the burbs either.

So you should be proud about that at least.

[Boris Godunov]

Good idea.

I've long advocated outright banning non-commercial vehicles from Manhattan, as I think it is the only real solution to the constant gridlock. Maybe increasing the cost of entering the city would help in lieu of that.

[Lawrence of Arabia]

I hate King Willie.

[Urban Ranger]

Singapore has the best traffic control idea.

Even though other countries can't copy the idea directly, they can use it with modifications. Simply put, issue separate licenses to be used for driving in large cities, say, London or New York City. People without the licenses can park their cars outside of the cities and take public transportation.

[MOBIUS]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Singapore has the best traffic control idea.

Even though other countries can't copy the idea directly, they can use it with modifications. Simply put, issue separate licenses to be used for driving in large cities, say, London or New York City. People without the licenses can park their cars outside of the cities and take public transportation.

Actually transport of all types was an absolute joy in Singapore - everything was just so... efficient!!!

It'll be even better when the new circle line goes in!

Actually the Singapore subway reminds me of the DC one with its similar architecture and mix of underground and raised railway - the one thing I didn't like was that if you buy single tickets, you have to pay an upfront deposit as the tickets are recycleable (good idea), but the card costs more that the price of the fare so they were losing money on lost tickets. This now mean that when you finish your journey you have to queue up again to get your bloody deposit back! A rare lack of foresight from the Singapore govt...

[Graag]

Originally posted by Felch X
The Tube sounds like an excellent system. In DC we've got a metro system that is good for hitting up touristy spots, but it doesn't cover much of the city, and isn't very extensive in the burbs either.

So you should be proud about that at least.

It's hard to be proud when you've got your face in someone elses armpit, there's no ventilation and the train you're on stops for no reason.

That said, it is does have quite good coverage of the city, when it's running and when there aren't 6 million other londoners on the same train.

I always thought it was madness to drive into london in the first place. It takes at least as long as the tube, costs a fortune or takes forever to park.

It's not a bad idea in principle, but it's just blantantly stupid to implement it at a time when the tube is in such shambles.

Oh, and I wonder how much of that £1m a day will go on administration, advertising and idiots.

[Graag]

Sydney - now theres an underground system. Clean, reliable, cheap and spacious.

[Caligastia]

Originally posted by Ming
In New York, you have to take a bridge or tunnel to drive onto Manhatten. You have to pay a toll to enter, or leave. The traffic is still a joke

Originally posted by JohnT
"Oh, I can see this working in Washington and all other American cities..."

You ever driven into Manhattan? Same principle applies -as a matter of fact, I'm not too sure you can actually enter without paying some government department some money - maybe if you walk or bike across the bridges, I guess.

Just to set the record straight...there are no toll charges on the Queensborough, Brooklyn or Manhattan bridges. I'm not sure if there is a toll on the queens-midtown tunnel, but I tend to think there isn't.

Don't worry, beaurocrats will have tolls on those bridges soon enough though.