Creationism reels back once again, or new four-winged dinosaur fossil found

[Drake Tungsten]

You haven't answered my question. You are merely stating the same thing again.

Your question isn't valid. I never said that all Chinese discoveries are false; I just said that it is reasonable to doubt this discovery based on recent events. If you don't like that, too bad.

[Japher]

You shouldn't dimiss anything without proof of the contrary. Yet, you shouldn't accept anything without proof of the like.

[Drake Tungsten]

You shouldn't dimiss anything without proof of the contrary.

I'm not dismissing this fossil find; I'm just extremely skeptical about it.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

You haven't answered my question. You are merely stating the same thing again.

Your question isn't valid. I never said that all Chinese discoveries are false; I just said that it is reasonable to doubt this discovery based on recent events. If you don't like that, too bad.

How is it not valid? A whole lot of countries have produced fossil hoaxes in the past, yet I have not seen you questioned the validity of new fossil finds from them.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Anun Ik Oba
Only you Urban Ranger can take a paleontological discovery and go straight to troll status with it.

You a creationist?

[Drake Tungsten]

How is it not valid? A whole lot of countries have produced fossil hoaxes in the past, yet I have not seen you questioned the validity of new fossil finds from them.

Only one country has produced fake proto-bird fossils in the last five years. Are you saying that decades-old hoaxes in the US are just as relevant as recent ones in China?