Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

50-year old professor sues 'American Idol'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by chegitz guevara
    It's age discrimination. Considering that they put it out for the world to see, it's an open and shut case. It's illegal to discriminate on the basis of age.
    It is not illegal to set age restrictions on a competition. Miss America has been doing it for decades. The contest is designed for people 17 to 24 years old.
    Tutto nel mondo è burla

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Boris Godunov
      Flubber, then please explain the age limitations given in the Miss America Pageant.
      What are they and have they ever been challenged??
      They would justify it as seeking/casting a young spokeperson I guess. I am not up on the latest decisions but it seemed to me that the entertainment industry has been given pretty wide latitude to cast people as they see fit


      I did see one instance where a human rights commission trashed ethnic/age/ sex requirements in entertainment. In Nova Scotia there is a historical fort where each summer they do recreations of life in the 1700s or 1800s. They had a policy of only hiring white men for the role of soldiers since the British regiment was all white and all male. This was challenged successful. The commission ruled that it was not a necessary requirement to have an all white group. They talked about the fact that historical accuracy would have likely required men much older than college aged, generally filthy and unshaven. Hiring mostly clean shaven high-schoolers and college kids had already departed from the visual accuracy of the presentation. Since then I believe thay have had a variety of ethnic minorities and women playing the role of soldiers.

      Are people aware of other times when an entertainment group has been suceessfully challenged for favoring one age/ sex/ ethicity over another ??

      Whats interesting is that a show like American Idol could probably avoid the whole fuss if they never stated an age requirement to begin with. They could have some junior flunkies screen the contestants early. Since part of the contest is to have a certain "look" I presume, this guy would likely get weeded out then.
      You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

      Comment


      • #48
        so they give academic degrees.

        I was led to believe that the degrees that they give are not academic in nature, but similar to trade schools here in Israel, and europe.
        urgh.NSFW

        Comment


        • #49
          Miss America contestants must be between 17-24. I have no idea if anyone has challenged them, but considering how long the competition has been around, I'd be surprised if there hadn't been.

          I participated in a few vocal competitions that were age-restrictive. The Real World is age-restrictive. Lots of private organizations set age limitations, be they for older people or younger people. Should I sue AARP because they discriminate against young people?

          Competitions usually have age restrictions for a reason. In general, age denotes experience, and competitions are trying to give exposure to inexperienced youngsters so as to give them a helping hand for their future careers.

          And I've yet to see anyone citing an applicable law that says competitions can't practice age restrictions.
          Tutto nel mondo è burla

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Boris Godunov


            Elitism is very unbecoming.
            Ok, I've read what everyone else said, now I respond.

            I wasn't poo-pooing Community Colleges as-such. Hell, I've been attending Truckee Meadows Community College for the past 4 years (this spring makes full 4 years)! I've gotten my Associates of Art degree from the credits I got over the first two-and-a-half years and now I'm working on the core classes for an Architectural transfer degree, looking to transfer within two years to U. of Nevada, Las Vegas.

            I've enjoyed my 4 years at TMCC. The problem is that CCs typically don't offer higher-level degrees, as mentioned by others. Further, it's been my experiance that some teachers couldn't hack it (for whatever reasons) as university nor full-level college professors, so they work at less-prestigous CCs; some are better suited as high school teachers; some seek better, more informal teaching enviroments/smaller classes and more individual contact with students; some seek to provide quality education to the not-able-to-afford-even-a-semester-at-the-more-pricey-places-that-teach-the-same-sh*t-but-with-more-pomp-and-circumstance people like me. All of those points are valid, so again I'm not poo-pooing CCs.


            Back on-topic, I know age-discrimination in the workplace is illegal for the most part, but can anyone cite actual laws/legislation forcing private contests/competitions to adhere to those same anti-age-discrimination laws? I mean really, could my 89 year old grandmother file a similar lawsuit to enter a children's beauty pagent?
            The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

            The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

            Comment


            • #51
              I did a cursory look at human rights legislation in Canada and "age" is a grounds for complaint. Age is usally defined in terms such that persons under 18/19/20 and over 65 have lesser right to complain. This is obviously so that drinking, voting and retirement laws and measures would not be subject to challenge.

              What was interesting was that while "age " seemed to appear in provisions prohibiting discrimination with regards to employment and providing accomodations, it was sometimes absent in provisions regarding providing "services or amenities" to the public, depending on the province. This is the provision that would prevent a shop owner for example from barring an ethnic minority form the store. The idea is that services and amenities normally provided to the public cannot be denied someone due to discrimination on one of the listed grounds.

              The question with these competitions -- like American Idol is whether they would be classified as an employment opportunity or the provision of a service or amenity. I think the latter classification might fit except that the legislation says services provided generally to the public . . . If a service is targetted at an age group, perhaps that is sufficient right there

              My quick look found no real good caselaw on this that jumper out ( but I did not look long)-- It seems that most " age " cases are in employment when older employees are turfed. If you could claim age discrimination, imagine the fertile field out there for litigation

              Seniors discounts-- ( some Human rights codes specifically state these are ok)
              an over 30 nightclub-- an under 30 nightclub
              any number of social clubs
              all sorts of pageants
              You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

              Comment


              • #52
                please explain the age limitations given in the Miss America Pageant.


                It's a compelling interest. You can only violate equal protection if there is a compelling interest. I'm sure that this case will be thrown out if it comes to court because 'American Idol' has a compelling interest in having its winner be in that age group in terms of marketing and demographics it is appealing to.

                Of course it might be a different case if it was restricted to only white people. The compelling interest might not be so clear there.
                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                Comment


                • #53
                  Judging from these arguments, then it must be OK for Augusta to allow only men.
                  "In Italy for 30 years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed. But they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love. They had 500 years of democracy and peace. And what did that produce? The cuckoo clock."
                  —Orson Welles as Harry Lime

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by MosesPresley
                    Judging from these arguments, then it must be OK for Augusta to allow only men.
                    It is legal for them to do so, but it shouldn't be OK.

                    ACK!
                    Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Judging from these arguments, then it must be OK for Augusta to allow only men.


                      But of course! You don't see protestors trying to get a law passed forcing women membership, you see them trying to get advertisers to stop dealing with Augusta and trying to shame Augusta. They know that Augusta is fully within its rights to forbid women members.

                      And personally, I don't care what they do. It's up to them.
                      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Right Imran. The Augusta discrimination is not employment discrimination but a private club choosing its membership...kinda like the Boy Scouts.

                        But beware attorney Gloria Allred (may she ) made her claim to fame by desegregating the private Jonathan Club here in Los Angeles. She did it by successfully arguing that the Jonathan Club was more than just a social club. Many governmental and business deals were worked out behind its oak doors, and so excluding women from the club had the effect of not permitting them to practice their profession based upon their gender.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Many governmental and business deals were worked out behind its oak doors, and so excluding women from the club had the effect of not permitting them to practice their profession based upon their gender.


                          Private conversations among governmental or business associates. It would not stand outside of California to call these actual government or business activities.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X