Tweet
My opinion of working justice system:
Since long terms in prison ussually doesn't helps to rehabilitate (people after for example 10 years doesn't has wehere to go back ussually, firms doesn't likes to give jobs to former inmates, ussually they also starts using drugs and has friends from prison, etc., so they starts to steal again), these should be stopped, as well as life sentences. Instead, capital punishment should be legalised. It should be used much more widely than ussually. Firstly, it would be used for most of bigger crimes (not for hooliganism or speeding obviously) if they are repeated for certain amount of times. Since if person for example steals cars, than sits in jail, after he gets out steals again, again gets in jail and later does the ame again, it proves that the person isn't rehabilitable. That means, he should completely be removed from society since he does bad things. He could get life sentence, but it would cost the state money then, which some states doesn't has. Thus capital sentence would be applied for big crimes (murders, mass murders, terror acts (if someone is killed), irreparably damaging someones health, drugdealing, drugusing, etc.) and for smaller crimes (but not very small) if they are repeated for certain amount of times. Sentences in jail would be limited to 1 year, since as I said before longer sentences does not works. However, conditions in jail would be much worse than they are now. For small criminal acts, like hooliganism, etc. very small sentences in jail would be given (beyond one week). Fines would remain for financial crimes (since most of street thugs ussually can't pay fine, while ones who commits financial crimes can). Tortuing wouldn't and couldn't be used to get information, however some forms of it could be used in jails as part of punishment (only such forms of tortuing would be used wich can't damage health later). Executions would be done by shooting people (since in my opinion poisoning and electric chair are inhumane). All executions would be done in secred places, however government would reserve right to do a public execution (shooting or hanging) for a very huge crimes, when people themselves requires that, but it wouldn't be widely practicised (examples of such crimes could include if someone raped and killed 100 kids of years 4-8, also if someone attempted to destabilise government/democracy or if someone in high position in government taken big bribe to make a deal which is very bad for country itself (makes country loose big amounts of money or other values) and war crimes). Since corruption would be considered a big crime, probably over the time it would tend to decrease - corruption is one of the major things which stops country from advancing. All people (from all sexual, ethnical, racial groups) would be equal against laws. If someone commited offence regarding to ethnicity/sex/sexual orientation/race (for example, straight man beaten a gay), for the first time he wouldn't be punished more as the orientation difference's could be just a coincidence. However if such attacks would continue, the criminal would get bigger sentence than it normally would for that crime.
If you don't agree with meabout this justice system, please write about your ideal laws and vote in the poll...
Since long terms in prison ussually doesn't helps to rehabilitate (people after for example 10 years doesn't has wehere to go back ussually, firms doesn't likes to give jobs to former inmates, ussually they also starts using drugs and has friends from prison, etc., so they starts to steal again), these should be stopped, as well as life sentences. Instead, capital punishment should be legalised. It should be used much more widely than ussually. Firstly, it would be used for most of bigger crimes (not for hooliganism or speeding obviously) if they are repeated for certain amount of times. Since if person for example steals cars, than sits in jail, after he gets out steals again, again gets in jail and later does the ame again, it proves that the person isn't rehabilitable. That means, he should completely be removed from society since he does bad things. He could get life sentence, but it would cost the state money then, which some states doesn't has. Thus capital sentence would be applied for big crimes (murders, mass murders, terror acts (if someone is killed), irreparably damaging someones health, drugdealing, drugusing, etc.) and for smaller crimes (but not very small) if they are repeated for certain amount of times. Sentences in jail would be limited to 1 year, since as I said before longer sentences does not works. However, conditions in jail would be much worse than they are now. For small criminal acts, like hooliganism, etc. very small sentences in jail would be given (beyond one week). Fines would remain for financial crimes (since most of street thugs ussually can't pay fine, while ones who commits financial crimes can). Tortuing wouldn't and couldn't be used to get information, however some forms of it could be used in jails as part of punishment (only such forms of tortuing would be used wich can't damage health later). Executions would be done by shooting people (since in my opinion poisoning and electric chair are inhumane). All executions would be done in secred places, however government would reserve right to do a public execution (shooting or hanging) for a very huge crimes, when people themselves requires that, but it wouldn't be widely practicised (examples of such crimes could include if someone raped and killed 100 kids of years 4-8, also if someone attempted to destabilise government/democracy or if someone in high position in government taken big bribe to make a deal which is very bad for country itself (makes country loose big amounts of money or other values) and war crimes). Since corruption would be considered a big crime, probably over the time it would tend to decrease - corruption is one of the major things which stops country from advancing. All people (from all sexual, ethnical, racial groups) would be equal against laws. If someone commited offence regarding to ethnicity/sex/sexual orientation/race (for example, straight man beaten a gay), for the first time he wouldn't be punished more as the orientation difference's could be just a coincidence. However if such attacks would continue, the criminal would get bigger sentence than it normally would for that crime.
If you don't agree with meabout this justice system, please write about your ideal laws and vote in the poll...
Comment