Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arabs attack Grozny

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • oh, so you don't understand.

    the vast majority of the DP condemned are guilty. the 'witches' were not.
    urgh.NSFW

    Comment


    • Originally posted by DanielXY


      No I think the US will wait for the UN to vote. And Bushs reaction will be like:
      a) If the result is yes - excellent
      b) If the result is no - hm, bad luck, too bad ... lets atack anyways

      If this is propaganda it is spread by Bush himself
      To some extent you are right about this - but Bush has taken the stance that Saddam has WoMD and that he is hiding them. If he is right on this, I believe he will prove it to the SC. If he has no conclusive proof, I think the inspection will continue so long as Iraq continues to cooperate 100%. I can hardly imagine Bush convincing anyone, let alone Congress or the American people, to go to war with no proof of WoMD and no demostration that Saddam in obstructing the inspections.
      http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Azazel
        oh, so you don't understand.

        the vast majority of the DP condemned are guilty. the 'witches' were not.
        Azazel, I turned against the death penalty when OJ walked free. I formed the conclusion that we do not have equal justice in the US - the rich can always beat the rap with good lawyers. It is therefore unjust to execute the average citizen who cannot afford the justice of the rich.

        I sound like a bleading heart liberal here; but this is just one Republican's opinion.
        http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

        Comment


        • I find that the DP is being implemented waay too often. But the option must exist.
          urgh.NSFW

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Azazel
            I find that the DP is being implemented waay too often. But the option must exist.
            Even guys that have tried to assassinate Ford and Reagan, and who did assassinate Bobby Kennedy, are in prison.

            For the especially dangerous, there is always the Hannibal Lector cage. Besides, breaking rocks while being constantly swarmed by mosquitos in the remote Alaskan wilderness seems like better punishment than a simple injection to put one quietly to sleep. Perhaps if Israel asks, we will share Alaska.
            http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

            Comment


            • Why would they need it? They've got the Negev. Still I guess there is nothing like knowing your 2000 miles from the nearest town, with subzero temperatures, to dampen a prisioners desires for escape. Kind of like our own mini version of Siberia.
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • Didn't the Brits send German POWs to the Northwest territories during WW2? Talk about a place where escape is meaningless.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Azazel
                  oh, so you don't understand.

                  the vast majority of the DP condemned are guilty. the 'witches' were not.
                  Who cares? it's not about the guilt, it's about what we do with this guilt. Killing a person is never moral.
                  "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                  I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                  Middle East!

                  Comment


                  • so if someone will try to kill you you won't kill him? OK....
                    urgh.NSFW

                    Comment


                    • I will. But that won't claim it was very moral.
                      "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                      I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                      Middle East!

                      Comment


                      • So if it wasn't moral, it was wrong, right?
                        urgh.NSFW

                        Comment


                        • I think in the self defense situation, one tries to defend oneself. One does not try to kill the other person. Once you get the upper hand, for example, you have no right to deliberately execute the person who attacked you.
                          http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                          Comment


                          • I'd say that once you're safe yourself, you are not justified in killing the attacker. But during a struggle, you can kill him.
                            urgh.NSFW

                            Comment


                            • If someone sits in a jail, He can't kill You...
                              "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                              I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                              Middle East!

                              Comment


                              • true, but if someone wouldn't face the risk of dying if he tried to kill someone, the odds of him killing another person would rise.
                                urgh.NSFW

                                Comment

                                Working...