I'm going to create another thread about guns...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Cross-Burning "Free Speach"?
Collapse
X
-
"Offensive free speech, as loathsom as it is, deserves protection as long as it doesn't cause clear and emminent harm. Someone claiming offensive speech should be censored simply because it offends their sensabilities just isn't a good enough reason for censorship"
It's not that the speech is offensive, it's that it intimidates people and threatens them, and you aren't allowed to do that even with your own property."I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer
"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Comment
-
I agree... threatening people should be against the law... but specifically making the act of burning a cross illegal is wrong. It's the threatening part that needs to be addressed. I should still be able to burn a cross on my own property if I wanted to. The line of legality should be drawn at the intimidation/threatening part.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
It's not that the speech is offensive, it's that it intimidates people and threatens them, and you aren't allowed to do that even with your own property."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
Comment
-
You aren't allowed to utter threats of death, mutilation, etc. Serious threats are not free speech.
Is the cross a symbol equivalent to giving someone a letter that says 'if you don't get out of town I'll chop off your head'?"Wait a minute..this isn''t FAUX dive, it's just a DIVE!"
"...Mangy dog staggering about, looking vainly for a place to die."
"sauna stories? There are no 'sauna stories'.. I mean.. sauna is sauna. You do by the laws of sauna." -P.
Comment
-
Is the cross a symbol equivalent to giving someone a letter that says 'if you don't get out of town I'll chop off your head'?
Not if it is on your property.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Individual instances of cross burning should be prosecuted based upon the circumstances surrounding the issue. There needs to be a victim, and the threat needs to be shown. I am against any sort of no-tolerance law against the burning of crosses, or any other symbolic act. It's the threat that's illegal not the symbol.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
"I think there's legally punishable intimidation if and only if there's an associated agressive act; there's an expression of hatred, yes, but there is no expression of a threat. "
I think an agressive act is something inherently associated with the burning cross given what it historically represents. Refering back to the original article:
A burning cross is indeed highly symbolic, Justice Thomas said, but only of something that deserves no constitutional protection: the "reign of terror" visited on black communities by the Ku Klux Klan for nearly 100 years before Virginia passed the law, which the Virginia Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a year ago.
A burning cross is "unlike any symbol in our society," Justice Thomas said.
"There's no other purpose to the cross, no communication, no particular message," he continued. "It was intended to cause fear and to terrorize a population.""I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer
"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Comment
-
The Burning Cross is naturally intimidating and should rightfully be banned.
If its on your own property, then it shouldn't.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
The Burning Cross is naturally intimidating and should rightfully be banned.
If its on your own property, then it shouldn't."I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer
"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Comment
-
AS DF doesn't even live in this galaxy then he can probably put what he likes up.
Andromeda is very tolerant(and of course no-one forces anyone to do anything)Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
Comment
Comment