Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Things Bush apparently doesn't need to attack Iraq

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Things Bush apparently doesn't need to attack Iraq

    **NOTE** As always, references to Bush and his decisions are of course referring to the Bush Administration and the real decision makers like Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Rove, etc. Let's not kid ourselves about Bush making any of these policies...

    1.) Approval from Congress:

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.


    2.) Support of our allies:

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.


    3.) Approval of the U.N.:

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.


    4.) Popular mandate:

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.


    If Bush attacks, he does so with only the support of his right-wing cronies in his administration and congress. Even the more moderate Republicans are backing away from it.

    Could he possibly be so stupid as to continue with the action anyway? Could he really be so reckless as to continue with the invasion when pretty much everyone in the world, and a majority in the U.S., say no?

    We'll see...it will depend on the economy. If it improves, expect the talk of war and invasion to dissipate into memory. If it doesn't, I bet they keep beating their ineffectual war drums.
    Tutto nel mondo è burla

  • #2
    Why are you always so convinced attacking Iraq is wrong?
    I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
    i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

    Comment


    • #3
      Nice objective piece Boris.

      Comment


      • #4
        ..from lots of different sources.
        www.my-piano.blogspot

        Comment


        • #5
          But that's not the point in Boris' post Chris.
          Should a US president just act a dictator during his term and attack a country regardless of what others think?
          "On this ship you'll refer to me as idiot, not you captain!"
          - Lone Star

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Chris 62
            Why are you always so convinced attacking Iraq is wrong?
            Because there isn't a shred of evidence they have done anything to warrant us attacking them?

            You kinda need a casus belli to go to war...

            Nice objective piece Boris.
            Since when did I say the thread was meant to be objective?

            ..from lots of different sources.
            Hey, time is short...
            Tutto nel mondo è burla

            Comment


            • #7
              It's EXACTLY the point, you must take each case individually.
              I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
              i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

              Comment


              • #8
                Could you elaborate Chris, I'm not sure I understand...
                "On this ship you'll refer to me as idiot, not you captain!"
                - Lone Star

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Boris Godunov
                  Because there isn't a shred of evidence they have done anything to warrant us attacking them?
                  Haven't been watching the news the last 11 years?
                  I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
                  i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Actually Chris, the only country that has threatened to use weapons of mass destruction against another country in the last decade or so is the US...
                    www.my-piano.blogspot

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jaakko
                      Could you elaborate Chris, I'm not sure I understand...
                      It's self evident.

                      If he annoced he wanted to attack, say Canada, you would have a point, but a country that is a known US enemy, terror supporter and constantly defies the UN resolutions against it?
                      I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
                      i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I reject outright the notion that the pansy ass UN shall ever have anything to say about US military action.

                        And I am about fed up with the anti-US sentiment on this board.

                        If the US was any near as evil as folks here say, we would just subjugate half the world. Some of the posters here are dumbasses.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Boddington's
                          Actually Chris, the only country that has threatened to use weapons of mass destruction against another country in the last decade or so is the US...
                          Such weapons are bio-chemical or Nuclear, what nations did the US threaten to use them on Spinky?
                          I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
                          i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            In all its wars of the nineties the US never discounted the possibility of using its nuclear weapons.

                            Show me any proof that they did.
                            www.my-piano.blogspot

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Furthermore, show us evidence of Hussein saying that he intended to use biochemical weapons aginst the US or other Western nations.
                              www.my-piano.blogspot

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X