American position on the PA

[CyberGnu]

So Gnu, aren't you a little ashamed of posting unbased unsourced opinions? Kinda like the Israeli press, don't you think?

Not at all. As long as I don't try to claim these opinions as facts.

Can I be trusted? Of course not. If I claim anything as a fact, you can ask me for a source. If I can't/wont provide proof, you can assume what I'm claiming is untrue.

[CyberGnu]

Please explain to me, how the murder of children in examples 8,9 and 11 , is

a) NOT"deliberate"
b) a mistake

a = b...

8: Bomber aiming for a bus, not 'a bus filled with children'. Children happened to be on the bus.

9 & 11: Shooter intended to kill occupying family. Shooter under fire. Shoots on anything that moves. Even happens to policemen in the US.

[CyberGnu]

Sending children to school on a bus is "putting them in harms way"? You're sick, very sick.

Allowing kids to live in a country that is occupying another is putting them in harms way. Regardless of whether they are on the bus.

Their parents value greed more than the lives of their kids. They are sick, very sick. and you are defending that... Which would make you sick indeed. Tell me, if you ever have kids, what will you sell them for? Land? Money?

[CyberGnu]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/A...4183407,00.html

OK, so if we can find the ones who did that we should string them up in a tree...

[CyberGnu]

Well, I'm off to bed.

Have a good night.

[Eli]

Originally posted by CyberGnu
Eli:

Yes, I'm secretly controlling the IDF and force them to kill palestinians.

I'm sure your reading comprehension level is not that low...

Your self-delusion is admirable. Just a question, since your grasp on reality is so thin, why don't you try imagine yourself surrounded with naked women or something? Would make more sense to create an illusion that is pleasurable, one would think. Of course, your fantasies might be psychotic in nature, and thus out of your control.... I hope your parents keep sharp objeccts away from you.

MWAHAAAANYANYANAYN!! DEATHHH!!!! KILL ALL PALESTINIANS!!! MURDER! KILL! DEATH DEATH DEATH! OOOHHHHH, I MUST SEE BODIES, BODIES, DEAD PALESTINAN CHILDERN. MORE! GIVE ME MORE! KILL KILL KILL!

[Eli]

Originally posted by CyberGnu
9 & 11: Shooter intended to kill occupying family. Shooter under fire. Shoots on anything that moves. Even happens to policemen in the US.

"Shooter intended to kill occupying family. "

Well? Therefore, he intended to kill the children too. Doh.

"Shooter under fire."

Source?

"Even happens to policemen in the US."

Source?

[CyberGnu]

Yes, I'm secretly controlling the IDF and force them to kill palestinians.



I'm sure your reading comprehension level is not that low...

?

MWAHAAAANYANYANAYN!! DEATHHH!!!! KILL ALL PALESTINIANS!!! MURDER! KILL! DEATH DEATH DEATH! OOOHHHHH, I MUST SEE BODIES, BODIES, DEAD PALESTINAN CHILDERN. MORE! GIVE ME MORE! KILL KILL KILL!

Talking to Sharon?

[The Mad Monk]

Originally posted by CyberGnu


a = b...

8: Bomber aiming for a bus, not 'a bus filled with children'. Children happened to be on the bus.

9 & 11: Shooter intended to kill occupying family. Shooter under fire. Shoots on anything that moves. Even happens to policemen in the US.

Please explain how "intended to kill occupying family" does not infer deliberately targeting children.

[GeneralTacticus]

Not the point. You are claiming that Israeli soldiers must occpuy palestine since palestine carries out attacks on Israel. But it is flawed logic, since the occupation is CAUSING the attacks.

How other arabs attacked in 1948 has nothing to do with terrorist attacks.

The Arabs attacked in 1948 to destroy Israel.

They lost.

In between the major wars, they have been continuously launching terrorist attacks against Israel. As there was no occupation then, you cannot claim that the occupation is causing the terrorism.

Entering the house: well, one could assume that not only kids live in the house, don't you think? In fact, one could even assume that there is a larger propability of there being adults in the house than there being children. So the attack was aimed at adults, and children were the victims. Victims of Sharons greed.

Do you really think it's that hard to see whether the person in a bed is a child or an adult?

[CyberGnu]

Well? Therefore, he intended to kill the children too. Doh.

No. If you are going to reply to posts to other people, you should read the entire thread.

[The Mad Monk]

I read the entire thread. Would you care to answer my request?

[Eli]

Originally posted by CyberGnu


No. If you are going to reply to posts to other people, you should read the entire thread.

I read the entire thread. Dont forget the two sources I asked for.

[GeneralTacticus]

Wasn't he under fire when this happened? I'd say that a person under fire is not capable of acting 100% rationally.

We could apply the same logic to IDF soldiers. But since you will refuse to consider granting this excuse to anyone you deem to be unworthy, we won't.

[CyberGnu]

"Even happens to policemen in the US."

Source?

http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/articles/copshoot.html

"Shooter under fire."

Source?

Ask Siro. I've been asking for two hours.