well, thanks for trying to answer my question...anyway,
I don't think they should be teaching techniques to children. IIRC, when I was first taught sex ed in school, they showed the anatomy of both male and female, then showed the act...male->female...using a cross sectioned pictograph. It was done in a scientific way that I thought (immature as I was at the time) very tasteful.
Im not against homosexuality or anything but I don't think they should be showing techniques to any children....homosexual/heterosexual/whatever....but they should show the dangers, STD's and what they look like.
I was shown what some STD's look like the third time I was taught sex ed. (My state had a policy of progresive sex ed) The pictures alone were disturbing.
I don't think they should be teaching techniques to children. IIRC, when I was first taught sex ed in school, they showed the anatomy of both male and female, then showed the act...male->female...using a cross sectioned pictograph. It was done in a scientific way that I thought (immature as I was at the time) very tasteful.
Im not against homosexuality or anything but I don't think they should be showing techniques to any children....homosexual/heterosexual/whatever....but they should show the dangers, STD's and what they look like.
I was shown what some STD's look like the third time I was taught sex ed. (My state had a policy of progresive sex ed) The pictures alone were disturbing.
Comment