Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

*sob* Argentina... :(

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    I had my butt kicked big time when I was trying to play soccer against you argentinians... I am pretty decent too at it... not great, but decent.
    For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

    Comment


    • #47
      I actually stayed up till about 4:20 AM to watch the end of this game, and I sincrely regret doing so. I was rooting for Argentina, but the way the played they deserved to lose. They dominated them in terms of time of possesion and had innumerable scoring opportunites. They had so many corner kicks and couldn't score off of any of them. It was really a pathetic scene to watch seeing the Argies fail to finish time and time again. They only scored when they got a free kick, nothing else the entire game.
      "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

      "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

      Comment


      • #48
        That's called a penalty.
        Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
        Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
        We've got both kinds

        Comment


        • #49
          Is supporting the stronger team a US convention? When I'm a neutral I almost always support the underdog, unless I really like the playing style of a certain team (ie. Czech Republic).
          Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
          Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Snapcase
            Is supporting the stronger team a US convention? When I'm a neutral I almost always support the underdog, unless I really like the playing style of a certain team (ie. Czech Republic).
            Not necessarily
            *cheers Red Sox*
            Stop Quoting Ben

            Comment


            • #51
              I always support the underdog too.
              Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
              Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
              We've got both kinds

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Boshko

                Not necessarily
                *cheers Red Sox*
                HEY!!! You changed your name! And you've got the squirell there. Great!

                Now we just need to get BD in line...

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Giancarlo
                  Argentines get rough when it comes to playing, believe I know it because I have played with a few at school... and only did it once... because they play too rough.
                  Are you sure you weren't playing rugby?

                  Comment


                  • #54


                    Well, England looks ok on the field, but with the way Sweeden has been playing, better get the bags packed Limeys!
                    "Dave, if medicine tasted good, I'd be pouring cough syrup on my pancakes." -Jimmy James, Newsradio

                    "Your plans to find love, fortune, and happiness utterly ignore the Second Law Of Thermodynamics."-Horiscope from The Onion

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      they won't be lpaying each other for a couple games and i don't think anyone actually believes that they'll be playing each other when the brackets finally join

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Is supporting the stronger team a US convention?

                        Nah, I'd say that the general preference is for the underdogs. Although the strong teams still turn out popular because the 30% of the people or so who do support stronger teams tend to pile on one team, and then desert en masse. See Dallas Cowboys for a good example. (The Yankees are weird. Evil, but their fans are all-weather generally, including the 80's when they sucked).

                        Anyway, glad that the European underdogs in the Group o' Death won. Now for a USA-South Korea advancement, and we're set.
                        All syllogisms have three parts.
                        Therefore this is not a syllogism.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Underdogs? It was called the group of death for a reason...none of the teams should have been confident of qualification.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            I'm rooting for underdogs: USA and England. Yeah, yeah, England has a chance, but repeated poor showings put them in the underdog category.

                            Then again, I'm a Yankees fan, so go figure. (1/2 back and closing, Boshko!)

                            -Arrian
                            grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                            The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X