Saint Marcus, I am surprised that you cannot see the basic problem. If an American, acting in his official capacity, is charged with war crimes by an enemy of the United States, and that person is arrested and taken to the Hague, the arrest is an act of war against the U.S. (Ditto any country trying to arrest an official of an enemy country. I can think of the Greeks trying to arrest Turk officials, for example.)
If the Dutch refuse to turn the American over to the United Stares, they too have committed an act of war.
The problem is not respect for treaties per se, it is that this treaty appears to permit countries to carry out war against their enemies by other means. The Dutch may have no idea what kind of quicksand they have just stepped into.
If the Dutch refuse to turn the American over to the United Stares, they too have committed an act of war.
The problem is not respect for treaties per se, it is that this treaty appears to permit countries to carry out war against their enemies by other means. The Dutch may have no idea what kind of quicksand they have just stepped into.
Comment