Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

War vs. Iraq - Ousting Saddam?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I'm for a Kurdish nation and state.... if they behave

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Dalgetti
      turkey.
      It think it is not that sure or they will allow it. Especial since the Israeli operation has Turkey moved towards a more pro arab stance. Also the improving relations between Turkey and Greece means that Turkey doesn't needs there military cooperation with the US and Israel that much as it did in the past.

      The Turkish economy isn't already doing very well, worsening relationsships with there arab friends wouldn't help there economy at all, it could even lead to economic embargo's.

      In my view will turkey only help if they can gain a lot for themself, Like a part of Iraq.

      Comment


      • #18
        since there is no Iraqi nation, but rather simply an iraqi state, this could be done. Turkey could also contribute a small parcel of land.
        No. Both Turkey and Iraq are sovereign states - we have no business taking land from either of them, or the moral authority.
        Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
        Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #19
          David, how does morality fit into this at all? Why does every action a state takes supposed to be moral?
          I never know their names, But i smile just the same
          New faces...Strange places,
          Most everything i see, Becomes a blur to me
          -Grandaddy, "The Final Push to the Sum"

          Comment


          • #20
            blah, David, you know that your moral authority doesn't matter. We're talking RealPolitik. the thing that does.



            and turkey will gain.
            It won't have as much trouble with the kurds, for example.
            also , with the renewed flaw of oil from Iraq that will , surely , have to pass through turkey , when the dust settles down , the turkish economy has much to gain from such a developement.

            The turkish leadership is imo pro-Israeli. even the street is pretty neutral in the cities.
            There is an Israel captain in one of the top turkish football teams. I don't think there is a major problem , except with muslim fundies.
            urgh.NSFW

            Comment


            • #21
              Morals and right and wrong always matter.
              Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
              Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

              Comment


              • #22
                OK... and you live in a world with clear right and wrong...

                ...as decided by you
                I never know their names, But i smile just the same
                New faces...Strange places,
                Most everything i see, Becomes a blur to me
                -Grandaddy, "The Final Push to the Sum"

                Comment


                • #23
                  As decided by natural rights and principles of non-coercion.
                  Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                  Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Dalgetti
                    with the renewed flaw of oil from Iraq that will , surely , have to pass through turkey
                    Iraq do have a coastline...

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      on morality: In conclution; David argues that the US doesn't have the moral right to give away land owned by a sovreigen country but all the rights in the world to invade them, destroy their buildnings, burn their crops and kill them.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Kropotkin
                        on morality: In conclution; David argues that the US doesn't have the moral right to give away land owned by a sovreigen country but all the rights in the world to invade them, destroy their buildnings, burn their crops and kill them.
                        David is against the invasion of Iraq.
                        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Notice the

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Indeed - I oppose virtually every war we've ever fought
                            Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                            Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by David Floyd
                              Indeed - I oppose virtually every war we've ever fought
                              Which one's do you support?
                              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Before starting Desert Storm II, the American government will have some explaining to do. The fact that Iraq is an ugly dictatorship is hardly reason enough to mount a massive attack. I can see two valid reasons to oust Saddam:
                                1) Iraq supports al-Qaeda on the same scale as the Taleban did;
                                2) Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, or is about to get them.
                                So far I haven't seen proof of either. Before George W goes ahead with his new war, he should disclose parts of the intelligence he has (intelligence as in CIA, not as in IQ ) and present ample evidence to the American people and America's allies.

                                2) seems very likely, 1) seems less likely, considering Saddam is a secular leader, not an Islamist.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X