OK, thanks for making that one thing clear. So it shall be time of peace... for now 
I get your point about educating. But I don't think it suffices. School students don't go to school because they want to learn but because they're forced to as well as to hang out with others. Especially that kind of education is way too weak. Plus, wasn't there that neat experiment done by some teacher that created some kind of mini system of hierarchic structures with one higher goal for his students, just to show them how easily even those can be reached by totalitarian ideas that have been educated well? I'm talking about The Wave, there's the book and a movie about it. I tell you, the mass is stupid. You can't just educate them, you have to keep them in their boundaries, and there are these laws for. Of course it's not particularly democratic, and I'm not even a big fan of democratic ideas, but in order to get the most and best of democracy for a long time, we have to pay a price, and that is limitation offree speech. You do the opposite - on the risk of growing extremists group, you pay the price of an endangered democracy for the higher goal of free speech. But then I suppose the American society is just not democratic enough (in other regards) as to let such groups come to power

I get your point about educating. But I don't think it suffices. School students don't go to school because they want to learn but because they're forced to as well as to hang out with others. Especially that kind of education is way too weak. Plus, wasn't there that neat experiment done by some teacher that created some kind of mini system of hierarchic structures with one higher goal for his students, just to show them how easily even those can be reached by totalitarian ideas that have been educated well? I'm talking about The Wave, there's the book and a movie about it. I tell you, the mass is stupid. You can't just educate them, you have to keep them in their boundaries, and there are these laws for. Of course it's not particularly democratic, and I'm not even a big fan of democratic ideas, but in order to get the most and best of democracy for a long time, we have to pay a price, and that is limitation offree speech. You do the opposite - on the risk of growing extremists group, you pay the price of an endangered democracy for the higher goal of free speech. But then I suppose the American society is just not democratic enough (in other regards) as to let such groups come to power

Comment