Democrat Suggests Administration Involvement In 9-11 Attack

[Tolls]

Out of curiosity has anyone tried to read that link WFHermans put up?
It's really quite amusing...
Quite impressive how much work someone will put into these things!

[Zoid]

WFHermans link was just hilarious

I liked this one the best:
----
As shown in Section 3 above, the fires did not cause the collapse of the towers, but it remains unproven that explosives caused the collapse. But the towers did collapse, and in a very strange manner, as if demolished in a controlled way, leaving almost nothing but metal fragments from the outer shell and huge quantities of fine ash and dust, without the central steel columns from the lower sixty floors either standing or fallen. This is very strange. Look at all that dust (click on the image for an enlargement and for two further pictures of the clouds of dust). It is as if some high-energy disintegration beam had been focused on the tower, pulverizing every concrete slab into minute particles of ash and dust (and leaving a nauseous odor which lingered on in Manhatten for many weeks, causing health problems for New York residents). But no country possesses such a disintegration beam — or if so, we have not been told of it.

The possibility that the Twin Towers were brought down by the use of laser weapon is discussed in detail in:

Laser Beam Weapons and the Collapse of the World Trade Center

But if "black" technology was used (rather than explosives) then one insight emerges: Why it was made to appear that commercial passenger jets were hijacked and crashed into the Twin Towers. The reason would be that such "black" technology is certainly beyond the capabilities of any Arab terrorists. Had this technology simply been used to bring the Twin Towers down then many questions would have been asked as to how this happened. A story that Arab terrorists detonated explosives which completely destroyed the buildings would not withstand criticism, so some other "plausible" explanation for the collapse of the towers had to be provided and this was done in the form of the plane impacts and subsequent fires. This "explanation" has an initial plausibility, and it was immediately broadcast by the mainstream media, and immediately accepted by a public in a state of shock. Only a careful examination of this story, such as has been done in J. McMichael's article, reveals its inadequacy, leading to the conclusion that either explosives were used to demolish the Twin Towers or some "black" technology was used.

Who possesses such technology? For sure not Arab terrorists, whose expertise with destructive technology extends not much beyond truck bombs.
---

Disintegration beam, "black technology" ? I mean come on...this is just ridiculous...

[WFHermans]

You want evidence? Total evidence? HERE IS EVIDENCE

http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html

[Ming]

Originally posted by WFHermans
You want evidence? Total evidence? HERE IS EVIDENCE

Evidence...



My favorite

As shown in Section 3 above, the fires did not cause the collapse of the towers, but it remains unproven that explosives caused the collapse. But the towers did collapse, and in a very strange manner, as if demolished in a controlled way, leaving almost nothing but metal fragments from the outer shell and huge quantities of fine ash and dust, without the central steel columns from the lower sixty floors either standing or fallen. This is very strange. Look at all that dust (click on the image for an enlargement and for two further pictures of the clouds of dust). It is as if some high-energy disintegration beam had been focused on the tower, pulverizing every concrete slab into minute particles of ash and dust (and leaving a nauseous odor which lingered on in Manhatten for many weeks, causing health problems for New York residents). But no country possesses such a disintegration beam — or if so, we have not been told of it.

This is stuff is funnier then the ONION...



Yes, some people have WAY too much time on their hands.

Hey WFHermans... any other "EVIDENCE" we can laugh at.

[Ming]

More WFHermans "Evidence"...

Furthermore, the manner in which the Twin Towers collapsed, and the nature of the resulting debris, suggest the use of technologically highly advanced means of destruction unknown to us. The real instigators of this atrocity (and of the larger drive to enslave, or perhaps exterminate, the entire population of the planet) may actually not be human at all (see The Gods of Eden). If so, we have a real problem.

Yeah... Aliens took out the WTC...



If you actually believe this stuff...

[Lonestar]

for WTF?Hermans and the good congresswoman.

[Ming]

And just who does WFHermans "evidence" point to...

6. The Perpetrators
The demolition of the WTC was part of an ongoing plan (in effect since the Kennedy assassination if not before) to destroy the American Republic (what's left of it anyway) and replace it by a de facto dictatorship (as part of the drive toward a global dictatorship in the form of a world government).

So Kropotkin was right... IT WAS THE GRASSY KNOLL GANG!




Gee... this site has no political agenda

And you really believe this stuff...

[Stefu]

I think Lonestar made the only worthy contribution to this thread, because his picture had a pretty woman in skimpy clothing.

[Zoid]

As a "left-wing nut" I must say that there´s a difference between believing that CIA killed Kennedy and that aliens blew up WTC...

The former is entirely credible, the latter is, quite frankly, raving mad

[Zoid]

...and the fact that the US administration should be involved in 9-11 is not so likely IMO. Just as it´s not so likely that the jews started WWII to get their own state (Protocols of Zion)

[Ming]

Originally posted by Kamrat X
As a "left-wing nut" I must say that there´s a difference between believing that CIA killed Kennedy and that aliens blew up WTC...

The former is entirely credible, the latter is, quite frankly, raving mad

Well maybe if Oliver Stone makes a movie about aliens blowing up the WTC, more people will start believing that too

[Zoid]

Originally posted by Ming


Well maybe if Oliver Stone makes a movie about aliens blowing up the WTC, more people will start believing that too

Maybe... But it would be hard for him to come up with conclusive evidence to support this

[Imran Siddiqui]

But but but lesbians are supposed to be pretty! PRETTY! Otherwise what's the point?

Unfortunetly that happens to be a very rare occasion .

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Kamrat X
Maybe... But it would be hard for him to come up with conclusive evidence to support this

When has that stopped him before?

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
"But but but lesbians are supposed to be pretty! PRETTY! Otherwise what's the point?"

Unfortunately that happens to be a very rare occasion .

Actually that's not true, there are a lot of trendy "lesbian for a day" types on college campuses around the country, and plenty of them are yummy. The great thing about them is that they're not really lesbians, so you can actually seduce them. Don't expect any three-way action though, you usually only get that from the truly disturbed types who are almost impossible to form any sort of bond with. I do agree though that a lot of the 'political' lesbians look horrific. They usually want it that way.