Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Canada still a constitutional monarchy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why is Canada still a constitutional monarchy?

    I've never understood this, so maybe somebody can explain this to me.

    Right now we have weird laws and regulations which bend around having the Queen technically be our head of state, but she can't do anything. We have a governor general with a beefy salary, and we shuttle her around the world to do siteseeing under the veil of "spreading Canadian culture".

    Why don't we just drop all of this overhead and become a republic?

    Is there any logical reason at all to wasting money on added loopholes, or is it simply sentimental value?

    Why can't the government put money saved from saving ridiculous monarchy-related expenses into the ailing public health care?
    "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
    Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

  • #2
    Be careful, Asher

    Lèse-majesté is still a felony in Canada...
    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
    Stadtluft Macht Frei
    Killing it is the new killing it
    Ultima Ratio Regum

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh, and Asher: please produce a cost/benefit analysis on the monarchy in Canada. There are tourism/goodwill benefits inherent in our current relationship with the Crown.
      12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
      Stadtluft Macht Frei
      Killing it is the new killing it
      Ultima Ratio Regum

      Comment


      • #4
        Lèse-majesté is still a felony in Canada...
        Another prime example of ridiculous Canadian laws.

        If I or any other real self-respecting conservative ever got into power there would be a LOT of changes to be made, and a lot of money to be saved.

        Refoooooooooooooorm.
        "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
        Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

        Comment


        • #5
          If we had started out as a republic, that would have been better, but I think that at this point cost savings aren't going to be realized by a switch. You would have to rewrite the constitution. That process and the consequent confusion over what the new constitution meant would probably end up costing far more than the cost of just sticking with what we've got.

          edit: last sentence didn't make sense
          What's so funny 'bout peace, love and understanding?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by KrazyHorse
            Oh, and Asher: please produce a cost/benefit analysis on the monarchy in Canada. There are tourism/goodwill benefits inherent in our current relationship with the Crown.
            I don't need to know the specific costs, but I do know there are zero benefits.

            There are NOT tourism/goodwill benefits. You really think people come to Canada more simply because or symbolic head of state is an elderly Queen who's only been to the country once or twice in her entire life?
            "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
            Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

            Comment


            • #7
              No, but it is a factor in their decision. Until you can show me some specifics I'm going to tend not to believe that the economic impact is anything other than minuscule, one way or the other.
              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
              Stadtluft Macht Frei
              Killing it is the new killing it
              Ultima Ratio Regum

              Comment


              • #8
                And tradition is important, BTW. Ask our American neighbours if it would be okay to pave over Civil War battlegrounds, etc.
                12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                Stadtluft Macht Frei
                Killing it is the new killing it
                Ultima Ratio Regum

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by KrazyHorse
                  No, but it is a factor in their decision. Until you can show me some specifics I'm going to tend not to believe that the economic impact is anything other than minuscule, one way or the other.
                  I don't know specifics. You're stalling and counting on my laziness to win here.

                  There are obvious costs to the monarchy connection. Blatant ones such as the governor general and her non stop worldwide trips and accomodations.

                  There are no such obvious benefits.

                  Why do we keep latching onto a moneyhole? If your arm is poisonous you amputate it. More cost upfront but will save you money over time.
                  "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                  Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Why is Canada still a constitutional monarchy?

                    She isn't ready to be annexed by the US right now.
                    I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                    For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Why is Canada still a constitutional monarchy?

                      To put it another way ... why not?

                      Quite frankly I fail to see the advantage in changing a system that seems to work fine the way it is.

                      Somehow I can't see that being under a republic would in any way remove loopholes. It'd just add new ones and more of them until the new system had the bugs worked out of it...
                      Money saved from the ridiculous monarchy-related expenses would go into ridiculous republic-related expenses rather than public health care.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Asher

                        I don't know specifics. You're stalling and counting on my laziness to win here.

                        There are obvious costs to the monarchy connection. Blatant ones such as the governor general and her non stop worldwide trips and accomodations.

                        There are no such obvious benefits.

                        Why do we keep latching onto a moneyhole? If your arm is poisonous you amputate it. More cost upfront but will save you money over time.
                        Why bother with national monuments? Why bother with stupid museums that need to be publicly-funded?

                        Sell Rideau Hall to the highest bidder! Next up: the Lincoln Memorial!
                        12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                        Stadtluft Macht Frei
                        Killing it is the new killing it
                        Ultima Ratio Regum

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Re: Why is Canada still a constitutional monarchy?

                          Originally posted by ravagon
                          To put it another way ... why not?

                          Quite frankly I fail to see the advantage in changing a system that seems to work fine the way it is.
                          $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

                          Somehow I can't see that being under a republic would in any way remove loopholes.
                          Like having the Queen actually own every piece of land in Canada. That's ridiculous, and shouldn't be.

                          Money saved from the ridiculous monarchy-related expenses would go into ridiculous republic-related expenses rather than public health care.
                          Says who?
                          What republic-related expenses would be added? We've paying the cost for republic-related expenses on top of the useless symbolic monarchy expenses. Why oh why?
                          "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                          Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Re: Re: Why is Canada still a constitutional monarchy?

                            Originally posted by Asher
                            Like having the Queen actually own every piece of land in Canada. That's ridiculous, and shouldn't be
                            The alternative is to have the federal government own every piece of land in Canada...
                            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                            Stadtluft Macht Frei
                            Killing it is the new killing it
                            Ultima Ratio Regum

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hey Asher. Why do you want to upset the Queen? Want to make her cry? You big bully!
                              Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

                              Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X