So What DO You Think? Is It Going To Take A "Small" Nuke?

[SlowwHand]

Talking Afghanistan here. What's it going to take?
At some point will "we" tire of attempting to end resistance in more conventional ways?
One wouldn't think so, but there are is the faction that thought it would take mere days to end the rounding up of Osama followers.
How much more indignant will they be if that option is considered?

[Venom]

I would like to take this opportunity to say

KILL ALL THOSE AFGHANI WHORES!!!! BURN THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN AND RAPE THE BUILDINGS!!!!! SOW THE MOUNTAINS WITH SALT AND PLANT THE FIELDS WITH ROCKS!

[orange]

And that'll be a ban for you Oh Mtg!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nukes are not an option. Period.

[Eli]

Cant we just let them starve?

[SlowwHand]

Well, U.S. forces lose a half dozen soldiers, and it's "big news" here in the forums.
Though any loss is a bad deal, was it expected there would be zero losses?
I mean, come on. The "Bad Guys" do have weapons of there own, and mountains to hide in.

Yeah. Let's just drop a "small" nuke and move on.
Whattayasay?

[Venom]

Originally posted by Eli
Cant we just let them starve?

I like your thinking!

[reismark]

Nukes are not an option. The day the nuke gets used again can officially said to be the first day of the end of the world. Period.

[orange]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
Well, U.S. forces lose a half dozen soldiers, and it's "big news" here in the forums.
Though any loss is a bad deal, was it expected there would be zero losses?
I mean, come on. The "Bad Guys" do have weapons of there own, and mountains to hide in.

A half dozen soldiers, while a loss and certainly something to mourn, is certainly not grounds for nuking 'because it's easier'. These people are in the military, they know what that means - it means putting their lives on the line. It's their job, this is what they are TRAINED to do.

Yeah. Let's just drop a "small" nuke and move on.
Whattayasay?

I'd say that it would be the stupidest possible outlet of thought for this war. Not only are we not fighting a 'nation', not only are the targets to spread out, not only do we not know the location of most of the targets, but the use of nukes would cause international backlash and probably topple any support we may have in the middle east, as well as promote more anti-US terrorist organizations that would/could consider suitcase nuking us.

In other words - diplomatic suicide. Next?

[orange]

Originally posted by Eli
Cant we just let them starve?

Or we could just give Israel back to the Palestinians and instantly make Arab nations love us

[Venom]

You're retarded if you think that will make them love us.

[SlowwHand]

For all you deep thinkers, I'm not advocating nuking.
I'm chastizing those who criticize every effort that is made.
From the time it takes to the loss of life.
Sheesh!

[ZoboZeWarrior]

Nuke ?

Afghanistan who is now helping US would sureluy appreciate that.
As others nations through the world ...

Plus a 'small' nuke will be less usefull in a mountain area than the enormous bombs you're using.

[orange]

Originally posted by Venom
You're retarded if you think that will make them love us.

You're retarted because you waste your time trolling a forum

C'mon Mtg, chop chop, ban ban ban

[My Wife Hates CIV]

Sounds like the US is kicking some major butt. So what if it takes a week or a year. The US suffers more deaths at home during military training. And most deaths have been from accidents or plane wrecks as far as the war over their goes. I think we're doing much better than the Russians ever did.

[Venom]

Originally posted by orange


You're retarted because you waste your time trolling a forum

C'mon Mtg, chop chop, ban ban ban

Well, in all seriousness, if you honestly think they'll love us after that, you are retarded. For many, it runs deeper than just Palestine.