Rate your fellow Apolytoner

[Lars-E]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Hey, Lars... maybe you should have made a 'Stupidest Apolytoner' thread... you'd win hand-over-fist .

Thank you but I think the giver is more deserving.

The reasons are clear to anyone 'intelligent'. And I'd like you to answer Asher's point about how you interpreted intelligence. Some of your choices made me go

You too?? Read my 1st post. Why don't you vote and then tell us how you thunk about it.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Lars-E
Omissions? How many would fit into 'Other'?

Well, pretty much everyone.

Do you know the meaning of the word intellectual?

Yes, but it's a broad term, and you never specified what you meant by it.

Do you mean philosophical?
Analytical?
Knowledgeable?

Your ground rules are a crock.

Sexual intelligence. J/k. Why did you skip my first post which sets all the ground rules?

You never set ground rules. You set 'categories', which still doesn't answer the question!
Categories of knowledge and experience don't translate into how intelligent someone is.

Idiot savants?

That's popculture for savant syndrome, but sure.

[Imran Siddiqui]

I would vote, but I want to know what I'm voting on .

MtG is most intelligent practically... philosophically, you'd have to give the edge to someone like Sikander... scientifically, either Provost or Big Crunch (whatever he calls himself now).

The inherant flaws of this poll are manifest to any odd observer.

Furthermore, since any critiques were met with insults, it stands to question that perhaps you have no arguments for your choices or why you even decided to start this?

[Lars-E]

Originally posted by Asher

Well, pretty much everyone.

Eggxactly.

Yes, but it's a broad term, and you never specified what you meant by it.

Do you mean philosophical?
Analytical?
Knowledgeable?

Be creative and make your own rules if you think it's difficult.

Your ground rules are a crock.

And so are you.

You never set ground rules. You set 'categories', which still doesn't answer the question!
Categories of knowledge and experience doesn't translate into how intelligent someone is.

That's right. Now, ask yourself, why did he ask: Do you know what the word intellectual means?

I'll be back in the morning European time. And when I come back No more Mr. Nice Guy!

[Asher]

Lars reminds me of Wiglaf.

One of those brick-wall flamers.

He's either trying to be funny in this thread, and failing quite miserably, or he's really that dense.

[KrazyHorse]

Is it just me, or does everybody else also feel that Lars-E deserves the "C*ck-Jockey of the Year" award?

[Lars-E]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I would vote, but I want to know what I'm voting on .

MtG is most intelligent practically... philosophically, you'd have to give the edge to someone like Sikander... scientifically, either Provost or Big Crunch (whatever he calls himself now).

The inherant flaws of this poll are manifest to any odd observer.

Furthermore, since any critiques were met with insults, it stands to question that perhaps you have no arguments for your choices or why you even decided to start this?

I started this thread cos I thought it might be funny. Take off your lab coat and drop that mouse! It's not meant to be serious Sam, silly.

You didnt read my 1st post. The actual thread starter. It's very basic to a thread. Think about it.

Insults only given from little moi? None taken.

The inherant flaws of this poll are manifest to any odd observer.

Oh yeah? This poll will be used by the users government to to to to to to to to to to to.....DO SOMETHING!!.......really IMPORTANT!!!

MtG is most intelligent practically... philosophically, you'd have to give the edge to someone like Sikander... scientifically, either Provost or Big Crunch (whatever he calls himself now).

You're actually thinking on your own. I think you have caught on to something here!

[Lars-E]

Originally posted by Asher

Lars reminds me of Wiglaf.

One of those brick-wall flamers.

He's either trying to be funny in this thread, and failing quite miserably, or he's really that dense.

Then why are you laffing?

What was your IQ again dumb American? Yeah I call you American. They own your colony.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Lars-E
What was your IQ again dumb American? Yeah I call you American. They own your colony.

I thought the British did?

Somebody help out a fellow dumb American, who owns my country? Why won't somebody tell me?

[Lars-E]

Originally posted by Asher

I thought the British did?

Somebody help out a fellow dumb American, who owns my country? Why won't somebody tell me?

Are you wearing a serious face and a lab coat? Didnt I tell you to take it off? Or was it Imran?

To be serious: I'm j o k i n g with you Asher. Bite.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Lars-E
Are you wearing a serious face and a lab coat? Didnt I tell you to take it off? Or was it Imran?

To be serious: I'm j o k i n g with you Asher. Bite.

Yeah, and I was serious when I asked who owned Canada.

You can't even play your own game.

[Lars-E]

Originally posted by Asher

Yeah, and I was serious when I asked who owned Canada.

You can't even play your own game.

Oh yeah?! Play this:

It's fun to keep a Euro up all night, not?

[devilmunchkin]

i'm surprised no one picked david floyd for history.
also, laz is incredibly bright in politics and economics
and PH and Ramo have great scientific intelligence
slowwhand has great common sense (as does supersneak)
MTg is overall intelligent

i'm not familar with anyone else to say my preference on Intelligence (not my preference in people)....so again, i must agree with asher and saying that the people listed are only a small fraction of what is present at apolyton.

[Imran Siddiqui]

i'm surprised no one picked david floyd for history.

I'm not

[connorkimbro]

Why don't you read my first post before you embarass yourself?

Oh, i don't feel that I embarassed myself at all. If i repeated what you said, then that's all the more indication that you should have done it properly right off the bat.