U.S. Ready for Pre-Emptive Strikes in Terror War

[WFHermans]

sure, mr Pretzel thought about all of that. while analyzing a proposition of Wittgenstein with the other half of his brain.

Shrub DOESNT WRITE HIS OWN SPEECHES

[Sirotnikov]

Originally posted by WFHermans
Israel is such a country. according to Torah they have to exterminate every non-jew in Israel.

I'd like you to find me a quote.

I'd also like you to find me proof Israel acts according to Torah law.

So let's nuke BOTH Washington and Jerusalem and take out two terrorist nations that have weapons of mass destuction and have already used them.

When has Israel used it's supposed stash of nukes?

[lightblue]

Originally posted by WFHermans
sure, mr Pretzel thought about all of that. while analyzing a proposition of Wittgenstein with the other half of his brain.

Shrub DOESNT WRITE HIS OWN SPEECHES

DL or just a really bad troll, what is everyone's guess?

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by lightblue


DL or just a really bad troll, what is everyone's guess?

I think he's just a being a Drake Tungsten.

[Khan Singh]

After having thought about this for a while, I have to reverse my position:

Iraq has proven itself untrustworthy and has placed itself outside the protection of international law. Destroying the Iraqi regime is the best option from a bad set of choices.

It is pretty hard to justify attacking N Korea. After 50 years of cease fire, we don't appear to have any extant causes for war. But the simple fact of the matter is that N Korea is a goofy Communist monarchy that grinds down its people to support its delusions of nuclear grandeur. Nobody likes them. Nobody wants them around. You are the weakest link. Good bye.

Iran is certainly a current state sponser of terrorism. If the US finds it necessary to threaten to attack Iran or to actually do so, then this is justification enough in the current circumstances. If Iran doesn't want this to happen, then they can agree to stop sponsoring terrorism. It isn't as if they have an Allah given right to ship arms to Hezbollah, after all.

We are obligated to uphold the UN Charter. But nothing in the treaty specifies that we have to act like complete chumps.

[WFHermans]

DON'T GO THERE
BUSH ASKS DASCHLE TO LIMIT
INVESTIGATION INTO WHAT HAPPENED ON 9-11.

REALLY?
WHAT A SURPRISE.
YOU'D THINK THEY HAD SOMETHING TO HIDE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wednesday, January 30 @ 10:09:24 EST

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into the events of September 11, congressional and White House sources told CNN.

The request was made at a private meeting with congressional leaders Tuesday morning. Sources said Bush initiated the conversation. He asked that only the House and Senate intelligence committees look into the potential breakdowns among federal agencies that could have allowed the terrorist attacks to occur, rather than a broader inquiry that some lawmakers have proposed, the sources said.

Tuesday's discussion followed a rare call to Daschle from Vice President **** Cheney last Friday to make the same request. "The vice president expressed the concern that a review of what happened on September 11 would take resources and personnel away from the effort in the war on terrorism," Daschle told reporters.


THIS IS PROOF FROM CNN THAT THE US GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS TERRORISM AGAINST ITS OWN CITIZENS.

[WFHermans]

Apolyton is censuring the first name of Dickie Cheyney?

[Bas]

Originally posted by WFHermans
What about a country whose leaders promise to commit genocide when they get nuclear weapons?

Israel is such a country. according to Torah they have to exterminate every non-jew in Israel.

So let's nuke BOTH Washington and Jerusalem and take out two terrorist nations that have weapons of mass destuction and have already used them.

It's ironic that someone with that name would write such complete bull****. Natan already debunked this post...

But if you really think that Bush & co are responsible for the 11-9 attacks, you must be from somewhere even worse than newsmax. You need therapy for paranoia, my friend.

Didn't Hermans himself write a book called paranoia, BTW?

[Khan Singh]

Something is terrorism only if it tries to create terror. Attempting to cover your a** is not terrorism.

I think a full investigation of 9/11 would probably be wise . But regardless of failures in intelligence, the clear cause of 9/11 is deliberate action by Arab terrorists. There is no point blaming anyone else. So Bush has a point.

[WFHermans]

No need to examine 911 because its crystal clear who did it, ARAB terrorists. Wait, lets get rid of all those courts and judges too. They are completely unnecessary because once the controlled media have decided who committed a crime why should we spend a dime on further investigations.
And the media is good at it! 5 minutes after impact they already knew it was Bin Laden and his fellow evil axis of Arabs. Next day they had a list with photos of the actual terrorists.

Read all about it on www.whatreallyhappened.com and you better note that link before some one whines about it to a mod and it disappears.

[Bas]

Congratulations. You are now officially the forum idiot.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Bas
Congratulations. You are now officially the forum idiot.

A forum idiot, yes. But there's strong competition for the title of The Forum Idiot, though

[WFHermans]

But there's strong competition for the title of The Forum Idiot, with Osweld and Bas running for the first place

[Bas]

Ik doe m'n best.

[DanS]

I'm afraid that we can't allow Iran to pursue nuclear weapons. In this instance, I would have my government strike as hard as possible and as quickly as possible to minimize the damage on all sides.

How can you allow Iran, who is all chummy with al Qaeda, pursue these weapons? Al Qaeda has shown what it will do, given dangerous enough weapons and we can't rest on the happy, but unrealistic assumption that they wouldn't use nukes, if given the chance.

This link was solidified in the US's mind by a personal envoy of the Iranian grand religious poobah giving explicit sanctuary to al Qaeda's leaders. The rest of this line of thinking is detailed here...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18121-2002Feb3.html

I know this freaks some people out, but these weapons are just too dangerous to ignore. One nuke in NYC would set the US back a century. The Russians are uniquely situated to realize that we mean business, and understand that it all hinges on a perceived magnitude of threat that 9/11 brought about.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20479-2002Feb4.html

This is a highly volatile situation, because it is unbalanced. It is very difficult to know whether the perceived threat has any way of becoming an actual threat. If we have to break a lot of China in the process, then it's unfortunate, because it could have been avoided by these countries by making it crystal clear that they either aren't seeking nukes or that they aren't supporting terrorist organizations.

The Iranians should have known better. If you pursue this stuff, then it's a whole other ballgame. Haven't they thought through the implications?