Clinton Is More Than Meets The Eye

[Buck Birdseed]

Oooh, damn, sorry, I missed that. I knew I shouldn't have skimmed through so quickly.

[Wiglaf]

And how is that relevent to this particular WWN article anyway, now that I look at it? You certainly can't say, as the site you're talking about did, using the term "ruled a suicide" is wrong or a sign of an invalid source of information if in reality the ruling by the police really was poor (Vince Foster for example, or the Enron exec).

I don't want this general little "Clinton's not a killer because of this website" links. Those are meant to disprove random rumors that float around, not established outlets like the WWN.

It's a BS site people. Unbookmark it.

[Buck Birdseed]

Er, have you ever heard of the bit of common sense known as "healthy skepticism"?

[DinoDoc]

Prove to me that Bush is not a killer

http://www.bk2k.com/bushbodycount/bodies.html

There are better reasons to hate the man than this you know. I could even list them for you if you want.

[Wiglaf]

LOL! Weekly World News is a solid, unbiased source of information. Bk2kInYoRepubFace.com sadly doesn't qualify.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
LOL! Weekly World News is a solid, unbiased source of information.

That still cracks me up.

Edit: YOU DON'T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, but at the same time YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE IT. This is like hell or something.

[Wiglaf]

What motive would Bush have for killing off someone who "advised him to join the National Guard"? OTOH, Clinton would have plenty of motive for his many listed sex scandal murders.

Clinton's body count is higher than Bush's anyway. Take Bill off the streets first and go from there. My point stands either way.

[Admiral]

As has been stated earlier in the thread, it is very easy to come up with a list of suspicious deaths, and much harder to disprove them. For every disporve that someone can bring up, the accuser can state that the new evidence is wrong. However, it is certainly possible to make something appear so implausible as to be not worth considering.

Firstly, as has also been previously stated, WWN is a parady of a tabloid. Therefore, they would not ever print anything that has even a remote possibility of being true. That being said, how can you say that that is a more reliable source than anything else?

Secondly, we can look at motivation. Clinton's second term was filled with the Monica scandal. If, as has been insinuated, most of the people were going to release information on Clinton's sex life, and Clinton had the power to kill large amounts of people, wouldn't he have killed Linda Tripps, Monica Louinsky, Kenneth Starr, etc? Since that wasn't the case, why would he kill some people who have potentially damaging information on him and not others?

Thirdly, about your CNN links. The only thing they do is say that the weather behaved unusually. Yesterday, it was supposed to be party cloudy at my house. it was actually clear. Do i now assume that i am the victim of a conspiracy? Also, even if the cause of a death cannot be fully ascertained, must we automatically assume that it was Clinton?

[Guynemer]

Hmmm... has anyone stopped to consider the possibility that Wiggy is himself a satire? I mean, honestly, it's either that or he has a psychiatric condition of considerable magnitude.

Wiggy, courtesy of Sagacious Dolphin:

[Wiglaf]

For Christ's sake people, I'm not a muppet. And while I'd love to see this topic die off as you monsters have threadjacked it to pieces, Admiral's remark upsets me greatly. To attempt to quickly address it:

Firstly, as has also been previously stated, WWN is a parady of a tabloid. Therefore, they would not ever print anything that has even a remote possibility of being true. That being said, how can you say that that is a more reliable source than anything else?

Two simple questions: 1) ever delivered a pizza? 2) how long you been reading the WWN? Pizza places can do the weirdest things to the whatever it is they're delivering, you know. It's not all peaches and cream when you make minimum wage after all.

Secondly, we can look at motivation. Clinton's second term was filled with the Monica scandal. If, as has been insinuated, most of the people were going to release information on Clinton's sex life, and Clinton had the power to kill large amounts of people, wouldn't he have killed Linda Tripps, Monica Louinsky, Kenneth Starr, etc? Since that wasn't the case, why would he kill some people who have potentially damaging information on him and not others?

As you can probably tell, Clinton hasn't exactly been damaged by Starr or Tripp. He rather enjoys the attention. The people the article mentions had much more on him, I'm afraid. Besides, keep in mind that he was playing this safe - the average person wouldn't be stupid enough to buy Ken Starr, Monica Lewinsky, and Linda Tripp choking on a sandwich at the same time and dying immediatly right before every damn scandal. Really guys...

Thirdly, about your CNN links. The only thing they do is say that the weather behaved unusually. Yesterday, it was supposed to be party cloudy at my house. it was actually clear. Do i now assume that i am the victim of a conspiracy?

Are you dead?

Also, even if the cause of a death cannot be fully ascertained, must we automatically assume that it was Clinton?

No, it was people hired by Clinton. That's fairly important. But yes, it's a reasonable assumption based on the facts and the political and personal affiliations that people dropping like flies in a bunch of unsolved murders is a bit out of the ordinary.

[chequita guevara]

Actually, a couple of those Bush deaths are true (though not committed by Bush Sr. he knew who did it and shielded them), specifically, the Letelier/Moffit deaths.

[Wiglaf]

Not relevant. And I want some CNN links.

[chequita guevara]

Who cares if they aren't relavent. They're the only damn true things in this whole freakin' thread!

And how the heck did Mrs. Clinton and Foster have a relationship if he was gay!?!

And CNN didn't exist in 1976, so they won't have any links.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Actually, a couple of those Bush deaths are true

If you throw enough crap at a wall, some of it is bound to stick.