Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Britain's prince harry dresses up as nazi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Boris Godunov
    PLATO, you're not implying that W is more moderate than Jeb, are you? From what I've seen, Jeb is easily the more moderate of the two.
    Jeb's not in the news as much.

    Comment


    • It's great Harry did this. After all who wants monarchs that never create a little controversy every once in a while. There would be absolutely no interest in the royals anymore
      "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
      "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Trajanus
        It's great Harry did this. After all who wants monarchs that never create a little controversy every once in a while. There would be absolutely no interest in the royals anymore
        ....err, he's not a monarch (or ever likely to be), he's a waste of space.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by reds4ever


          ....err, he's not a monarch (or ever likely to be), he's a waste of space.
          35 years later and people are still asking the question:
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Kuciwalker
            It could go either way. I wasn't challenging his grammar, I thought he meant a Ford dynasty and a Reagan dynasty and a Bush dynasty.
            But it couldn't go either way, which is my point. The way he phrased it excluded the possibility that he was referring to a separate dynasty for each.

            He would have to have said, "the Ford, Reagan and Bush Dynasties" to mean that.
            Tutto nel mondo è burla

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Boris Godunov

              He would have to have said, "the Ford, Reagan and Bush Dynasties" to mean that.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by JohnT
                35 years later and people are still asking the question:
                Wow, That's a ver 70-ish cover
                "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                Comment


                • I don't know which is worse: That an obviously stupid boy is dressing as Nazis or that this was on a fancy aristocratic party with the nice title "Colonial lords and savages (or was it natives)"? Decadent British aristocrats still styling as colonial lords. This worries me more than an idiot, which is something quite common in aristocratic circles...
                  "The world is too small in Vorarlberg". Austrian ex-vice-chancellor Hubert Gorbach in a letter to Alistar [sic] Darling, looking for a job...
                  "Let me break this down for you, fresh from algebra II. A 95% chance to win 5 times means a (95*5) chance to win = 475% chance to win." Wiglaf, Court jester or hayseed, you judge.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Spiffor

                    Wow, That's a ver 70-ish cover
                    Well, it was, like I said, 35 years ago.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Kuciwalker


                      It could go either way. I wasn't challenging his grammar, I thought he meant a Ford dynasty and a Reagan dynasty and a Bush dynasty.





                      You'll find I frequently mean what I say, and say what I mean, unless I'm being ironic or sarcastic, in which case this is usually signalled by context and phraseology.


                      My grammar is correct, but your interpretation/misreading incorrect, because such a reading is not valid given what I have written.

                      If you read my posts you'll find I have a reasonable amount of dexterity with the English language, by virtue of having studied it for quite some time, and in depth.

                      Scrupulous attention to text usually pays dividends.
                      Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                      ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Pekka
                        Sonds too much like a pattern there.. maybe I should break the pattern and lead the country. Who knows.. we might win. My side always wins. SO .. if it won't happen, then you just have to be on my side without the country, that is if you want to win.
                        If I was American, I would vote you. If not you, Ted Striker.
                        Trying to rehabilitateh and contribuing again to the civ-community

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by reds4ever


                          Well you subsidise them then (and the royal family while youre at it)

                          oh, and the welsh.
                          Hey! - we brought the world Tom Jones, not fair
                          And Kylie Minogue(well her grandmum anyway)..........The Stereophonics...........Shakin Stevens(!) and jokes about sheep-sh**ing, thats got to be worth a fair bit

                          edit: i forgot to add we also brought you the 'Tudors', to get it more on topic
                          'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.

                          Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by child of Thor


                            edit: i forgot to add we also brought you the 'Tudors', to get it more on topic
                            With those howling successes, Henry VIII, Edward VI and Mary I.

                            And the dynasty's founder had a highly dubious claim to the throne in any case.


                            Still, at least Elizabeth Tudor had something going for her.


                            You forgot to mention: Lloyd George, Catatonia, the Manics, Dylan and Edward and R.S. Thomas, Henry V, Owen Glyndwr, Shirley Bassey, and Gorky's Zygotic Mynci, along with other iconic proofs of Welsh genius.
                            Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                            ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                            Comment


                            • true.....i never said the Tudors were a good thing..

                              but thanks for the other list - i feel much better and can hold my head high again as i walk amongst the english
                              'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you.info here. prove me wrong.

                              Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.

                              Comment


                              • What, Catherine Zeta-Jones not good enough, is she?
                                Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                                Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X