Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Britain's prince harry dresses up as nazi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Look you must have pity, Harry is a complete moron.. some people are just born that way. They are wild, crazy and stupid. It was a very offensive thing to do, and he should be kicked in the head for it nonetheless.
    For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Boris Godunov
      Reread the sentence, what molly wrote was correct. I thought it was your math SAT you flubbed, not the verbal, right?


      There was no Ford dynasty. There was no Reagan dynasty. It's a bit over-the-top to call it a Bush dynasty.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kuciwalker




        There was no Ford dynasty. There was no Reagan dynasty. It's a bit over-the-top to call it a Bush dynasty.
        The sentence you quoted:

        As opposed to electable stupidities and sillinesses, such as Ford, Reagan and the Shrubbery dynasty.


        To clarrify it, read it as:

        As opposed to electable stupidities and sillinesses, such as Ford, Reagan and "the Shrubbery dynasty".


        Also:
        Dynasty
        1. A succession of rulers from the same family or line. A sequence of powerful leaders in the same family
        One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

        Comment


        • I dream of a country where one can dress up as a nazi and be ashamed of it.

          it is a costume party after all.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dauphin
            Also:
            Dynasty
            1. A succession of rulers from the same family or line. A sequence of powerful leaders in the same family
            Doesn't succession imply an inheritance of title as opposed to election of same?
            "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

            “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

            Comment


            • dp
              "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

              “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe


                Doesn't succession imply an inheritance of title as opposed to election of same?
                Do you think Dubya would be President if it weren't for his dad?
                One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Dauphin


                  Do you think Dubya would be President if it weren't for his dad?
                  Do you think His dad would have been President if not for Reagan?

                  Point being its not an automatic but requires approval of the electorate (or for the delusional the illicit action of the supreme court.)
                  "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                  “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                  Comment


                  • So you agree that there is a certain degree of inheritance involved. (the election being another part was never disputed btw)
                    One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Dauphin
                      So you agree that there is a certain degree of inheritance involved.
                      At best a minor one. While I would agree presidents are always made men. If that means they inherit their influence by way of family or via political networking the effect is the same. The bottom line though even if annoited by the political machinery they require tacit approval of the electorate. Which rather was the point of Molly's post that the US electorate is moronic.

                      As for the Molly quote, Kuci is quite right to question its veracity.

                      For we know the electable stupidity doesn't apply to Ford as he was never elected pres or vice president in a general election.

                      The shrubbery dynasty is a stretch both on terms of only 2 family members constituting a sequence of rulers as well as the point of succession.

                      Lastly that leaves the electable stupidity of Reagan, who given the alternatives of Carter and Mondale makes this a rather simple answer.

                      All in all a typical over the top generalization from our favorite author of puffery.
                      "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                      “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                      Comment


                      • My quibble with Kuci is that he seemed to think molly was using incorrect grammar and inadvertently saying there was a Ford and Reagan dynasty. Grammatically, that's not what molly was saying at all. He was saying "Ford, Reagan and the Bush Dynasty," dynasty only referring to the Bushes.

                        "Dynasty" has become a word with broad meaning, and pretty much everyone refers to the Bushes as a dynasty, as assuredly as they refer to the Kennedies as such.
                        Tutto nel mondo è burla

                        Comment


                        • The Kennedy plan:

                          John
                          Robert
                          Ted

                          The Bush plan

                          George HW
                          George W
                          Jeb

                          Both "clans" at the extreme end of their parties with the most moderate members being elected first.
                          "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

                          Comment


                          • Sonds too much like a pattern there.. maybe I should break the pattern and lead the country. Who knows.. we might win. My side always wins. SO .. if it won't happen, then you just have to be on my side without the country, that is if you want to win.
                            In da butt.
                            "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
                            THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
                            "God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.

                            Comment


                            • PLATO, you're not implying that W is more moderate than Jeb, are you? From what I've seen, Jeb is easily the more moderate of the two.
                              Tutto nel mondo è burla

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Boris Godunov
                                My quibble with Kuci is that he seemed to think molly was using incorrect grammar and inadvertently saying there was a Ford and Reagan dynasty. Grammatically, that's not what molly was saying at all. He was saying "Ford, Reagan and the Bush Dynasty," dynasty only referring to the Bushes.
                                It could go either way. I wasn't challenging his grammar, I thought he meant a Ford dynasty and a Reagan dynasty and a Bush dynasty.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X