Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Britain's prince harry dresses up as nazi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by PLATO
    Overreaction? This man is third in line to the throne of the British Empire. This is a total lack of judgement on his part. Someone this close to the throne can't afford to exhibit this type of insensitivity. Tens of millions of people died due to the Nazis.
    It was a private fancy dress party. It was admittedly a lack of judgment and taste, and clear signs that this 20 year old needs to grow up a lot quicker.

    However, people are reacting as though he'd just professed neofascist leanings, which despite his seeming ability to open his mouth and put both feet in, he hasn't done.


    Millions of people died because of Catholicism and religion, and people still dress up as nuns, bishops and go to vicars and tarts parties.


    Oh, and the British swapped an empire for a Commonwealth a while ago.

    We are the Commonwealth agency for civil society. Funded by member states, we aim to strengthen civic voices and enhance participatory governance.
    Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

    ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by C0ckney
      if it was an indication that harry was a nazi, then it would be something to worry about, but i don't think it is, anymore than wearing a 'CCCP' jacket is an indication of being a communist.
      I know quite a lot of people who feel personally offended by CCCP jackets. And remember the furore here on Poly over Stalin avatars?

      Rebecah Wade at The Sun recently got into trouble for putting the headline "Bye Bye Big 'Ead" (about Brian Clough's death) next to an article about the beheading of Iraq hostages. Was it intentional? Certainly not. Should she (or at least her subeditors) have seen that it was inappropriate and might offend and not done it? Definitely.

      It would have been a different matter if Harry had been doing it as a piece of black humour of something. But he is obviously just clueless.
      Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
      Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

      Comment


      • #18
        yes some people are over-sensitive, that's hardly big news
        "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

        "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

        Comment


        • #19
          WHat's the problem with wearing an army uniform to a fancy dress party? It's just the same as a comedian dressing up as Hitler for a sketch, or a drama about Stalinism. What's the big deal?
          Smile
          For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
          But he would think of something

          "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

          Comment


          • #20
            I see he has inherited his Grand Dads knack for putting his foot in it!

            Comment


            • #21
              Exactly how stupid do you have to be though.

              Please put all these monarch out of their misery once and for all...
              Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
              Then why call him God? - Epicurus

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by alva
                Exactly how stupid do you have to be though.

                Please put all these monarch out of their misery once and for all...
                He's just going back to his roots.......

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Drogue
                  WHat's the problem with wearing an army uniform to a fancy dress party? It's just the same as a comedian dressing up as Hitler for a sketch, or a drama about Stalinism. What's the big deal?
                  I think there's a difference between being offensive for comical or artistic purposes (or using potentially offensive material for an artistic purpose, knowing it might be percieved as offensive) and being offensive out of malice or ignorance. This wasn't a joke, he's just a prat with no clue about history.
                  Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
                  Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    it's not the brightest thing he's ever done, but there seems to be a bit of an overeaction here.
                    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      think there's a difference between being offensive for comical or artistic purposes (or using potentially offensive material for an artistic purpose, knowing it might be percieved as offensive) and being offensive out of malice or ignorance.
                      And of course this was for the comical, unless you think he was doing it out of malice?

                      We have living history days at the many battlefields around where I live, and I sometimes set up a table with some of the WWII stuff I have collected. Just a few rifles and a machine gun, a few helmets. Mostly German. I will be sitting there talking to American WWII vets with their VFW hats about their experiances and hippies will still walk up and imply I am an nazi for owning the stuff. This is the same thing.

                      Though I will admit that knowing who he is wearing the Swastika arm band is a bit much, especially since in isn't a German Army uniform item, rarely worn.
                      "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Patroklos


                        And of course this was for the comical, unless you think he was doing it out of malice?

                        Mmm, do much dressing up for fancy dress parties in Klan costumes, do you?


                        See, some people might think that comical, other people might take offence.

                        Was there a pressing need for him to wear a swstika armband?

                        No. He could have worn a plain old dull Wehrmacht uniform, without the symbol of the Nazi Party. He could have dressed up as the Kaiser- after all, that would have been relative.

                        However, being the undereducated expensive Royal twit that he is, he just couldn't think far enough ahead to see the consequences of his actions.
                        Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                        ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Well, in the US owning/buying/selling NAZI memorabilia is cool. But in many other first-world countries it would land you on the wrong side of the law.
                          I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Maybe, just maybe, it's another step in Britain's ascencion to modernity by removing the uselesses from their royal throne?
                            "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                            "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                            "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Well, the Royal family are Jerrys.

                              Anything to get rid of the parasitic scum I say.
                              Only feebs vote.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Spiffor
                                Maybe, just maybe, it's another step in Britain's ascencion to modernity by removing the uselesses from their royal throne?
                                That would involve wholesale culling of the afflicted.
                                Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                                ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X