Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Its not a troll at all.
The problem pointed to is defined by the OECD as lack of policy coherence. This is where one government policy undermines or works against another.
One example would be spending 177 million a day on the war in Iraq whilst offering only 10 million in aid to tidal wave survivors. Sumatra is a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism, perhaps the Afghanistan of tommorrow.
Another would be Europe spending 9 times as much on agricultural subsidies as they spend on aid to developing countries whilst closing their markets to developing country agricultural exports.
If you look at either case, its madness from an economic policy point of view.
Nor, btw, is it in tune with conservative free market economic policy.
Its not a troll at all.
The problem pointed to is defined by the OECD as lack of policy coherence. This is where one government policy undermines or works against another.
One example would be spending 177 million a day on the war in Iraq whilst offering only 10 million in aid to tidal wave survivors. Sumatra is a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism, perhaps the Afghanistan of tommorrow.
Another would be Europe spending 9 times as much on agricultural subsidies as they spend on aid to developing countries whilst closing their markets to developing country agricultural exports.
If you look at either case, its madness from an economic policy point of view.
Nor, btw, is it in tune with conservative free market economic policy.
Comment