Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Protestantism a reactionary movement?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Urban Ranger
    You wouldn't call the overthrowing of corrupt regime of the Shah of Iran by Ayatollah Khomeini "fairly new," even though that was indeed a revolution.
    The Reagan revolution didn't overthrow the previous regime.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by BeBro
      Of course one could say the Catholic Church was in fact the conservative element since they tried to keep the status quo (JohnT's "worldliness" ), and Luther's "back to the bible" had a progressive element given the condition in which the church as institution existed at Luther's times. Calling it reactionary then may be technically correct but still is somewhat irritating when you understand "reactionary" as something directed against progress.
      OK. Lets call it fundamentalism.
      "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
      I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
      Middle East!

      Comment

      Working...
      X