all of the value of privacy you had mentioned was in it's value for evading law enforcement
No, the value of privacy is the ability to be left alone and not have people pry into your private information, which you would rather be secret. It may not be illegal, but who knows, it may be considered immoral. I believe that gays in a relgious area of the country would not like their affiliation to be paraded around. That could cause them much difficulties.
The problem here is that privacy doesn't interfere with democracy in any sort of orderly predictible way.
So what? Who says that orderly predictable ways are the best ways to get results? Prohibition was defeated in random ways, but a bunch of unrelated people deciding not to follow the law.
If privacy is a necessary extension how does my freedom change if that extension is removed?
Your freedoms evaporate. Since you don't have any privacy anymore, how can you exist as a private person? Your freedom to act in legal ways may be compromised by the morality of the mob.
Liberty is not just the right to be left alone, but is much more than that, the right to be free, the right to do something, the right to speak, the right to practice religion, the right to travel freely, the right to work the job that you want, and to take another job.
All of those deal with (to varying degrees) the right to be left alone. I'll use your religious example, you have no right to religion if the government will crack down on your for issuing a viewpoint. Your freedom of religion is the right to be left alone in your religious beliefs.
The right to privacy doesn't mean you have to do it in private, it means that you are in " the state of being free from unsanctioned intrusion" (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=privacy - The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition; Definition 2)
Comment