Does This "Disprove" Homosexuality?

[Whaleboy]

Mr Mitchell, the thing is, if you put your hand on the hot plate so to speak, you are INVALIDATING the practice of HOMO-SEXUALITY.

Hardly, if you consider it as contextual as in my previous post, for example, on a given level on the HoN it is not invalidated in its own context. In the context of a single gay person it does not invalidate it because homosexuality for him will be descriptive and not prescriptive. That is to say he is not defined solely by his sexuality and thus in a situation where another part of his definition is exhibited (for example a hypothetical desire to extend the human race (operating on the assumption you have failed to qualify previously), the other parts are not involved anyway, so it does not "invalidate" it.

Why?

Because you now argue it is a LUXURY.

Marriages ain't about luxury.

So suddenly this has switched from Lord of the Flies to Hugh Grant and the Oxford Rectal Society? . I very much doubt that in the cutthroat beginnings of the human race marriages existed. Procreation occured through rape and yet even then there are some theories that homosexuality existed. Marriage, in the examples you have used, ARE a luxury.

[Nubclear]

Taking this a step further - if you don't have children, your commiting an atrocity!
Every male on Poly should rape as many women as they can

[Lincoln]

If I was gay in that position (no pun intended) I would stay true and let the human race die out. It seems like a huge mistake anyway...

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Mr Mitchell, the thing is, if you put your hand on the hot plate so to speak, you are INVALIDATING the practice of HOMO-SEXUALITY.

Why?

Because you now argue it is a LUXURY.

Marriages ain't about luxury.

No, heterosexual intercourse isn't about luxury, in the extreme case. Since we aren't in the situation you proposed, it really makes no difference.

[Kuciwalker]

Re: Re: Does This "Disprove" Homosexuality?

Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
No, but it does prove your idiocy, Wiggy.

Nice troll, though it's not quite up to your previous achievements. Keep practicing, you'll be back in top form sooner or later.

I don't think "Uhhh [Bush] has a DOG. Check your facts. And you are bordering on sedition" can ever be topped. Sorry, wiggums.

[mrmitchell]

Thanks defend me , Whaleboy.

Wiglaf tell me take English but still loose in the head.

[Whaleboy]

WAKE UP PEOPLE. You got to draw the line somewhere. And so far the analysis has not even been challenged.

The great are only appreciated when they are dead, the saying goes. Well I ain't waiting.

Diatripe. Please qualify. I'll ignore the second sentence on the grounds of BS, the first is wrong considering that you were already demolished before I even looked at this thread, and what line? And why draw it where you are, considering that the ridge upon which you would draw it has been turned to rubble.

Everyone else on the planet has been destroyed due to a meteor or somesuch.

No you misunderstand. I used the term "necessary condition" to ask you why they should NECESSARILY act to preserve the human race. That poses a deep philosophical question of whether or not we do so anyway! Certainly in that context an anticipatory approach would be replaced by sensational anyway, put another way, one would live in the present and not worry about some hypothetical future.

NO NO NOT EVERYTHING. Just a coupling of two people who want to live forever who, without the deviant factor, would have made babies WINK WINK and thus evolved the race.

Who want to live forever? WTF are you on about?

As a bisexual I find it offensive that you call it the "deviant" factor so I'll assume you mean in your example if a person was heterosexual as opposed to homosexual. I default back to my previous question of why, baring in mind the hierarchy of needs, it is a necessary condition to preserve the human race in that context, as opposed to surviving or being comfortable/happy for example?

[reds4ever]

Originally posted by Lincoln
If I was gay in that position (no pun intended) I would stay true and let the human race die out. ...

Nah, you should step up and take one for the Humans!

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Lincoln
If I was gay in that position (no pun intended) I would stay true and let the human race die out. It seems like a huge mistake anyway...

The Voluntary Human Extiction Movement

[Whaleboy]

WINK WINK

Around here, we call it sex

[Wiglaf]

the homosexuals would be forced to have sex with the woman.

EXACTLY. When push comes to shove, relationships suddenly get serious??? Does that not seem morally wrong to you? Goodness, the hypocricy is making me want to shoot my monitor.

Marriage, in the examples you have used, ARE a luxury.

HUH? By marriage I also meant "hookups." Anything but homosexuality. Obviously in this day and age, marriage is more of a necessity. But in cave-man world, we're talking.

Taking this a step further - if you don't have children, your commiting an atrocity!
Every male on Poly should rape as many women as they can

Nope, but the government does not have to endorse people not having children.

And to bastardize relationships into luxuries is to bastardize my toaster into a sex-object.

In the context of a single gay person it does not invalidate it because homosexuality for him will be descriptive and not prescriptive.

Homosexuality always reflects on the individual's sexuality, regardless of circumstance. Every time gay guys hookup, the gene pool weakens. A dog dies, if you will.

[Nubclear]

Sex is an unholy word. G-d punishes you to eternity in hell if you say it.

[Nubclear]

EXACTLY. When push comes to shove, relationships suddenly get serious???

Your one of those people who believs that sex == love?

Your easier to pwn than Fez is!

[Wiglaf]

Sex isn't a biological luxury, it's a requirement. Gay marriage is the former, obviously. There ain't no disputing that.

[mrmitchell]

Wiglaf my teacher say is costumary for someone say " You welcome " after I say thank you. You not say " You welcome " to me ? I just simple illegal immigrant. I just want friend.