Does This "Disprove" Homosexuality?

[Whaleboy]

Judging from Wiglaf's posts, no one seems more in need of a blowjob right now than him.

As for Obi Gyn's tortured attempt to impose his 16th century Puritan christian morality on us, well- here's to him getting any, and then perhaps giving the sex threads a rest for about an aeon or two.

[Wiglaf]

Does my situation disprove the idea of avoiding pain in normal situations? Nope.

It shows it's a luxury.

[Whaleboy]

It shows it's a luxury.

ok I think this is necessary. Wigga, define luxury.

[Wiglaf]

Is this who I'm up against? Whaleboy, who invents things people say and puts them in his sig, and Molly Bloom, a silly sexually charged brat?



Whaleboy, homosexuality is a convenience, i.e. you do it to pleasure yourself, wink wink, much like the reason you don't put your hand on a toaster.

Heterosexuality is no luxury. The species does it to survive. I.e., they clearly evolved it to survive.

He shoots, he scores! Wiglaf 1 Everyone Else 0.

[Whaleboy]

Is this who I'm up against? Whaleboy, who invents things people say and puts them in his sig, and Molly Bloom, a silly sexually charged brat?

I invent them? Que?

Whaleboy, homosexuality is a convenience, i.e. you do it to pleasure yourself, wink wink, much like the reason you don't put your hand on a toaster.

And you don't equate that to heterosexual love. Your reasoning for doing so only applies in a "desert island" situation which is flawed nonetheless due to the hierarchy of needs.

Quad erat demonstrandum

[Last Conformist]

And with whom did Wiglaf score? Whaleboy?

[Whaleboy]

And with whom did Wiglaf score? Whaleboy?

Yay!! Whaleboy needs man love!

Wigga would you say that luxury is contextual or objective to the human condition?

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Is this who I'm up against? Whaleboy, who invents things people say and puts them in his sig, and Molly Bloom, a silly sexually charged brat?

Oh dear, we've progressed from 'comrade bloom' to 'silly sexually charged brat'.

Well my partner of 20 years would say you have the sexually charged bit right

(I wouldn't want to blow my own trumpet, but then perhaps if you had the ability to, it might save threads like this from starting....).


You seem a tad testy, and a little more illogical than usual- are the bedpans causing that much of a distraction?

Perhaps if they emptied them before banging on your tinfoil hat.....?

[Last Conformist]

In the case of Wiglaf, I think survival is a luxury we could do without.

[Wiglaf]

And you don't equate that to heterosexual love.

What? Heterosexual love can be done for pleasure too, but as an entity it is far from a deviant gene, because its purpose is clear enough. Homosexuality is inherently opposed to the continuation of the species.

Quad erat demonstrandum

Well there's someone who thinks he's smart.

[MORON]

Wiglaf: no one cares. Posting on poly and watching porn is a lux, but we still do it dont' we.

Fundamentally, people act according to their own will, not the will of all humanity of eternality bull crap. People live not for the human race, but the piece of fat inbetween their skull. The rest is simply irrevelent.

[Wiglaf]

Wiglaf: no one cares. Posting on poly and watching porn is a lux, but we still do it dont' we.

Big difference between getting married and spending minutes/hours on the internet.

Fundamentally, people act according to their own will, not the will of all humanity of eternality bull crap. People live not for the human race, but the piece of fat inbetween their skull. The rest is simply irrevelent.

What's your point? If that someone has a disease in between their skull, he'd want to treat it, especially if it would mean the betterment of humanity.

[Last Conformist]

Originally posted by Wiglaf


What? Heterosexual love can be done for pleasure too, but as an entity it is far from a deviant gene, because its purpose is clear enough. Homosexuality is inherently opposed to the continuation of the species.

OK, now you've almost provoked me to my senses.

If you're gonna be a baby-eating liberal evolutionist, get it F*CKING RIGHT, YOU F*UCKING IDIOT!

Since your knowledge of genetics and homosexuality obviously add up to zero, how about you shut up and go back to Boston and give Kerry a blowjob? Then one person on the planet would derive some benefit from your existence.

[Whaleboy]

What? Heterosexual love can be done for pleasure too, but as an entity it is far from a deviant gene, because its purpose is clear enough. Homosexuality is inherently opposed to the continuation of the species.

If you haven't realised by now that a) homosexuality has not been evolved out for a reason, b) the primary cause of both heterosexual and homosexual love is not the preservation of the species and c) that it is self-evident that homosexuality is not utterly opposed to the continuation of the human race, then I doubt you ever will, at least until you're out one night, a little tipsy and you are propositioned by men much larger than yourself. Keep your voice down darling .

Well there's someone who thinks he's smart.

Ummm, own goal?

[Whaleboy]

Big difference between getting married and spending minutes/hours on the internet.

Let me guess, you're very much towards the latter?

What's your point? If that someone has a disease in between their skull, he'd want to treat it, especially if it would mean the betterment of humanity.

Even by you reasoning its fallacious to call it a disease. By proper reasoning it's ridiculous!