Whoops! Bush's military records "accidentally" destroyed

[JohnT]

Here are some other email address for you to use, Boris:

Program Management Office Mailing Address

HQ DFAS/PFI
Attn:
1050 Forrer Boulevard
Dayton, OH 45420-1472

Program Director

William D. Lethgo, COL, USA
william.lethgo@dfas.mil

Deputy Director

CPT Joseph Krupa, USA
joseph.krupa@dfas.mil


PFI Financial Analyst

SFC Harold W. Kinamon, USA
harold.kinamon@dfas.mil

PFI Financial Administrator

SGT Robert W. Weeden, USA
robert.weeden@dfas.mil

PFI Administrator

SPC Donald J. Bortz, USA
donald.bortz@dfas.mil

[JohnT]

Lastly, here's a handy link to a map to the base, courtesy of Mapquest. And JohnT.

[DinoDoc]

I bow to the master.

[SpencerH]

JohnT wins!

[Drake Tungsten]

The Master

[Kuciwalker]

JohnT 1, Boris -100

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

I'm betting this one gets archived in the JohnT vaults.

[Sava]

I'm surprised at the naivete of people who don't think there are real conspiracies out there.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Its not so much surprise at the possibility of conspiracy but the constant assumption that everything is one.

[SpencerH]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
Its not so much surprise at the possibility of conspiracy but the constant assumption that everything is one.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by JohnT
I beg your pardon?

Implied smiley!

1. The records were not at the Pentagon.

Excellent. So we know they were in a less secure place than the Pentagon.

2. The "clout to make such a thing happen" would reside in a larger number of people than you assume.

That's assuming the destruction would be carried out under proper channels of authorization, which I think it's safe to assume it would not be. See below:

Bush 1 calls his buddies at the CIA (1) to ask for the records to be destroyed. They research it and find that they are kept in Kettering, OH, necessitating a call to the person able to give orders ...

Here's where I would disagree with the scenario. Why does the CIA have to call anyone? They don't have to go through proper channels. Rules don't constrain people when they're engaged in dirty tricks. So one operative needs to know, get inside the facility and see to it the things are destroyed. That would minimize the hands getting involved in the mess.

Finally, if you are truly interested in tracking this down for yourself Boris

Nah, here's where my gives a **** is broken. That's when it crosses from entertainment to drudge work.

You have shown me, however, that the ability to destroy these records deliberately wasn't nearly as difficult as I thought it would be. Thanks for the info

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Excellent. So we know they were in a less secure place than the Pentagon.

That's assuming the destruction would be carried out under proper channels of authorization, which I think it's safe to assume it would not be. See below:

Here's where I would disagree with the scenario. Why does the CIA have to call anyone? They don't have to go through proper channels. Rules don't constrain people when they're engaged in dirty tricks. So one operative needs to know, get inside the facility and see to it the things are destroyed. That would minimize the hands getting involved in the mess.

Oh yes, they're just going to walk in and take it, are they?

[Sava]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
Its not so much surprise at the possibility of conspiracy but the constant assumption that everything is one.

well where there's smoke, there's fire.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Kucinich
[q] Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Oh yes, they're just going to walk in and take it, are they?

It's the CIA, for ****'s sake. Do you think they don't know how to infiltrate secure locations?

[Lefty Scaevola]

Originally posted by Sava
well where there's smoke, there's fire.

Where there is stupid posts, there are stupid posters?