Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Space Elevator in 15 years?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Drose has a point. Who will be the first couple to do it in the space elevator? That's a record many people would want to get.

    Comment


    • #47
      15 years is based on technical considerations. Throw in political and economic ones and it's anyone's guess.
      Visit First Cultural Industries
      There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
      Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by DanS
        On the other hand, a ribbon would have a high surface area and really low terminal velocity. This would seem to make it rather safe from the doomsday scenarios offered by DRose.
        Why on earth do you need a cable that long?
        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Dr Strangelove


          And you're just the man for the job.
          Actually, I thought Lazarus smells bad without farting?
          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Urban Ranger


            Why on earth do you need a cable that long?
            in this case the cable has to be long enough to "balance" things out. The end has to have enough centrifugal force on it to keep the ribbon taut.

            Comment


            • #51
              Even if the cable won't damage the Earth, it'd still suck for those riding the elevator at the time. Doesn't make it any less cool though.
              Visit First Cultural Industries
              There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
              Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

              Comment


              • #52
                Even if the cable won't damage the Earth, it'd still suck for those riding the elevator at the time.
                Yes, their terminal velocity might be quite a bit higher.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Dissident
                  in this case the cable has to be long enough to "balance" things out. The end has to have enough centrifugal force on it to keep the ribbon taut.


                  The other end of the cable should be anchored.
                  (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                  (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                  (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    I'm talking about the space end. There is nothing to anchor it to.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Urban Ranger




                      The other end of the cable should be anchored.
                      To what? You definitely need to put your "anchor" further away than geosynchronous orbit (~40 000 km IIRC)

                      And the closer your anchor is to geosynchronous the more mass you need to put there. It's a simple question of requiring that the net force on the upper part balances out the net force on the lower end.
                      12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                      Stadtluft Macht Frei
                      Killing it is the new killing it
                      Ultima Ratio Regum

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Dissident
                        I'm talking about the space end. There is nothing to anchor it to.
                        The sugestion I've heard for anchoring the space end is to put a huge hunk of mass on the end somewhere above geosyncronous orbit. That would provide a counterbalance to the mass below. But the minimum possible length would be the height of geosyncronous orbit. Making it exactly this height would require an infinite anchoring mass.
                        12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                        Stadtluft Macht Frei
                        Killing it is the new killing it
                        Ultima Ratio Regum

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Immortal Wombat
                          That's arguable.

                          15 years is somewhat optimistic, shall we say. And of course, once we have built it, it'll break or fail or something. And being stuck in a lift 10 miles above the earth for 18 hours while the engineers try to fix things - that wouldn't be much fun.
                          I don't think it's intended for people (it would be exciting tho), but as a cheap way for launching satelites and stuff into orbit.
                          Try my Lord of the Rings MAP out: Lands of Middle Earth v2 NEWS: Now It's a flat map, optimized for Conquests

                          The new iPod nano: nano

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Let's see now. In the accelerating reference frame of the rotation of the earth, the "force" a mass m experiences is equal to m * (GM/(r^2) - r*w^2) (downward) with M the mass of the Earth, r is the distance from the centre of the Earth to the mass and w is the angular frequency of the Earth's rotation i.e. 2Pi/24hours (assuming you put all these in the right units)

                            Now, say we assume that we have a material with a maximum (mass) tensile strength of s (s is gotten by dividing the cross-sectional tensile strength t by the mass density p so s = t/p and thus has units of Newton*metres/kilograms = metres^2/seconds^2).

                            Say that we want to hold up a maximum car mass of m. This makes the bottom of the cable required have a linear mass density of u0 = m/s*(GM/R0^2 - R0*w^2) where R0 is the radius of the Earth.
                            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                            Stadtluft Macht Frei
                            Killing it is the new killing it
                            Ultima Ratio Regum

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by KrazyHorse


                              The sugestion I've heard for anchoring the space end is to put a huge hunk of mass on the end somewhere above geosyncronous orbit. That would provide a counterbalance to the mass below. But the minimum possible length would be the height of geosyncronous orbit. Making it exactly this height would require an infinite anchoring mass.
                              that's why you make it longer.

                              The figure I heard was twice the height of geosynchronous orbit.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                KH is a show-off.
                                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X