ACS Fantasy Baseball Draft Record

[Berzerker]

You didn't. You compounded it. Like a deer in the headlights.

But I did, if I hadn't called your attention to your mistake it would have been a source of confusion later on when someone wanted either Santana or Wells. They would have been stuck asking (and waiting) for the problem to be resolved - a problem you caused, not me. I'm , you're

Ah yes, I forgot, you don't have common sense .

It's common sense to ignore your mistakes and act as if they never happened?

So because he wants his own thead, since he can't read between the posts that goes someway to explain your assertion?

So now it's his fault too? Hmm... It's Slow's fault for complaining and starting a new thread. Imran posts a contradictory pick 4 minutes after the Gimps make their pick and doesn't notice they just posted a pick causing confusion and now it's my fault. Gee, it's always someone else's fault...

I'm doing all the leg work here... I don't see you doing anything, except slowing down the draft .

I'm not the one who gave the Gimps the wrong player. Shall everyone vote on who and what caused the delay to see if common sense is really common? Someone else asked that the confusion you caused be cleared up before proceeding, are they at fault now too?

Didn't even post your pick in the form of the list. Worthless as teats on a boar .

Isn't that what Slow said about you? We don't need to post the list with every pick, the list can be updated every 3 or 4 picks. Why is this the first time you've complained about someone posting their pick without the list? Strange, it's Slow's fault for not being able to read thru the clutter and now it's my fault because Imran needs the entire list posted with every pick?

[SlowwHand]

Popcorn! Hot dogs! Coooo-lldd DRINKS!

[Imran Siddiqui]

But I did, if I hadn't called your attention to your mistake it would have been a source of confusion later on when someone wanted either Santana or Wells.

No it wouldn't. Someone would have seen it and said since SS said 'Wells', we are going with Wells. Hell the two people who picked afterwards, put the pick as Wells... why did you have such problems?

Not my fault you need your hand held.

Hmm... It's Slow's fault for complaining and starting a new thread.

What was wrong with the original one?

Someone else asked that the confusion you caused be cleared up before proceeding

Actually Guy said we y'all get this straightend out, after you posted we are stopping the draft because you couldn't make a simple decision .

BOTH vlad and asleep put SS's pick as Wells. Guy only stopped because you said we are stopping the draft.

Isn't that what Slow said about you?

Exactly.

We don't need to post the list with every pick, the list can be updated every 3 or 4 picks. Why is this the first time you've complained about someone posting their pick without the list?

Well if you are going to bring up what Sloww wanted, you can at least not cherrypick and look at the entire original post .

[SlowwHand]

I hate, just hate, to agree with Imran; but as a matter of fact, I did ask to copy and paste; and talk in his nastyass thread. Polluted as it was.

[Berzerker]

Geez, I posted a thread announcing how I was drastically cutting back on my OT participation for personal reasons with the goal of eliminating these long drawn out, time consuming debates and I'm stuck in one with Imran over his mistake. Can't you just admit you goofed and leave it at that? No one was accusing you of being incompetent, we just wanted the mistake corrected before proceeding. Now we're arguing about who caused the delay

[Imran Siddiqui]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
I hate, just hate, to agree with Imran; but as a matter of fact, I did ask to copy and paste; and talk in his nastyass thread. Polluted as it was.

I know it's tough. You did the right thing .

[jdd2007]

M Ordonez
I Suzuki

[Imran Siddiqui]

SS, back on the pot.

[SlowwHand]

The Draft

1. World Conquest Game (jdd2004)
2. Gimps (Soul Survivor)
3. Berzerker (Berzerker)
4. Weasels (Lawrence of Arabia)
5. BC Stoner Bears (vlad)
6. Georgia Goonies (Imran Siddiqui)
7. Exeter Reds (vlad antlerkov)
8. The Laminated Cats (asleepatthewheel)
9. Love Haters (Guynemer)
10. Creeps (Apocalypse)
11. Dallas Dwarf Tossers (Slowwhand)
12. City Hobgoblins (Stuie)

1.1 A. Rodriguez - NYY
1.2 A. Pujols - StL
1.3 M. Prior - ChC
1.4 N. Garciaparra - BOS
1.5 V. Guerrero - ANA
1.6 R. Halladay - TOR
1.7 A. Soriano - TEX
1.8 B. Bonds - SF
1.9 T. Helton - COL
1.10 B. Boone - SEA
1.11 P. Martinez - BOS
1.12 J. Schmidt - SF

2.12 J. Thome - PHI
2.11 T. Hudson - OAK
2.10 K. Wood - ChC
2.9 S. Rolen - StL
2.8 E. Renteria - StL
2.7 C. Beltran - KC
2.6 G. Sheffield - NYY
2.5 C. Shilling - BOS
2.4 D. Lowe - BOS
2.3 C. Delgado - Tor
2.2 M. Mussina - NYY
2.1 E. Gagne - LA

3.1 J. Vazquez - NYY
3.2 V. Wells - TOR
3.3 J. Lopez - BAL
3.4 M. Ramirez - BOS
3.5 R. Johnson - ARI
3.6 M. Tejada - BAL
3.7 K. Foulke - BOS
3.8 R. Oswalt - HOU
3.9 P. Wilson - COL
3.10 A. Jones - ATL
3.11 B. Wagner - PHI
3.12 D. Jeter - NYY

4.12 E. Guardado - SEA
4.11 H. Blalock - 3B - Texas
4.10 R. Furcal - ATL
4.9 Barry Zito - SP, Oakland Athletics
4.8 J. Posada - NYY
4.7 M. Mulder - OAK
4.6 J. Pierre - FLA
4.5 J. Smoltz - ATL
4.4 R. Nen - SF
4.3 J. Santana P-
4.2 M. Rivera - NYY
4.1 M Ordonez

5.1 I Suzuki

[Vlad Antlerkov]

SS!

Originally posted by Berzerker
Johan Santana

NOOOOOO!!!

Nasty, false, tricksy Berzerkers! You stealses our precioussss!!! We hates it! We hates it forever!

[Imran Siddiqui]

Geez, I posted a thread announcing how I was drastically cutting back on my OT participation for personal reasons with the goal of eliminating these long drawn out, time consuming debates and I'm stuck in one with Imran over his mistake. Can't you just admit you goofed and leave it at that? No one was accusing you of being incompetent, we just wanted the mistake corrected before proceeding. Now we're arguing about who caused the delay

Can't you just admit that you goofed by stopping the draft and leave it at that?

[Berzerker]

I hate, just hate, to agree with Imran; but as a matter of fact, I did ask to copy and paste; and talk in his nastyass thread. Polluted as it was.

That's fine, he wasn't enforcing that in this thread though. Plenty of people just post their pick, especially following someone who just posted the entire list. But it's only now when I do it he decides to complain.

No it wouldn't. Someone would have seen it and said since SS said 'Wells', we are going with Wells. Hell the two people who picked afterwards, put the pick as Wells... why did you have such problems?

The question is why you didn't have a problem. Even Gimps decided to take the pick you posted... If someone wanted Wells or Santana what were they supposed to do? Obviously since the 2 people afterward didn't want Wells or Santana they had no reason to ask for clarification. But you act as if their alleged lack of confusion means you caused none, that's illogical. The confusion didn't effect them...

Not my fault you need your hand held.

Not my fault you screwed up. Btw, I did suggest we continue with the draft based on the assumption SS's pick of Wells was the one we should go with. You coneniently ignore that fact...

Actually Guy said we y'all get this straightend out, after you posted we are stopping the draft because you couldn't make a simple decision .

Hmm...straighten WHAT out? Oh yeah, the confusion you caused. Couldn't he make the simple decision to continue? No, he saw the confusion you caused and decided we should wait for clarification too.

[Imran Siddiqui]

But it's only now when I do it he decides to complain.

Yes, because you bring up Sloww's comments. I thought you'd want to stick by them.

The question is why you didn't have a problem. Even Gimps decided to take the pick you posted... If someone wanted Wells or Santana what were they supposed to do? Obviously since the 2 people afterward didn't want Wells or Santana they had no reason to ask for clarification. But you act as if their alleged lack of confusion means you caused none, that's illogical. The confusion didn't effect them...

They obviously decided that SS's prior pick superceeded the incorrect list pick I put in. Why would anything think it was any different?

I did suggest we continue with the draft based on the assumption SS's pick of Wells was the one we should go with. You coneniently ignore that fact...

After you stopped it. You needed an hour to think it through?

Hmm...straighten WHAT out? Oh yeah, the confusion you caused.

Actually, you caused the confusion by stopping the draft and saying that perhaps my later list pick invalidated SS's actual pick. Since Guy saw you said both were equally valid, he didn't go on. When someone says 'stop the draft', they'll stop as well.

[Berzerker]

Yes, because you bring up Sloww's comments. I thought you'd want to stick by them.

Obviously some of us didn't see Slow's request about posting the entire list with every pick, it's not like you cared enough about his request to issue some bold announcement to catch our attention. Why aren't you complaining about others posting just their picks? Hell, jdd just posted his picks without the list and not a peep out of you...

They obviously decided that SS's prior pick superceeded the incorrect list pick I put in. Why would anything think it was any different?

Things don't think, as you're showing. We don't know what they decided, they may not have even seen your mistake. They may have not cared enough to worry about it since neither wanted Wells or Santana. Obviously others did see your mistake and wanted clarification.

After you stopped it. You needed an hour to think it through?

Actually, I spent maybe 3 minutes thinking about it. I just had others things to do and didn't spend the whole time considering what we should do and whether or not you'd honor our decision.

Actually, you caused the confusion by stopping the draft and saying that perhaps my later list pick invalidated SS's actual pick. Since Guy saw you said both were equally valid, he didn't go on. When someone says 'stop the draft', they'll stop as well.

I said both were valid? How can we get 2 players with 1 pick? You caused the confusion by posting a different pick and disappearing leaving it up to others to work thru the problem.

That's the last I will say on the matter, I just don't have the time or desire to waste hours on such a ridiculous debate.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Obviously some of us didn't see Slow's request about posting the entire list with every pick

OH HO!!! We have some more proof that the pot is calling the kettle black!!

Obviously others did see your mistake and wanted clarification.

Yes you. Guy stopped because you made a fuss about it.

I said both were valid?

You said either could apply and without guidance you couldn't be sure.

disappearing leaving it up to others to work thru the problem.

Like I said... hand holding. Make a decision and move on. You don't need me for it.