Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Grant on the $50 bill?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by MrFun
    And yeah Imran -- Lee has been overrated ad nauseam.


    He had tunnel vision when it came to envisioning war strategy beyond the borders of his state, Virginia. He also disregarded advice of lower ranking officers such as during the battle of Gettysburg. He was a human being -- not a deity or a god.
    Well, he can certainly be questioned on that point. But it was not Lee's job to envision overall war strategy until late in the war when it was too late to do anything but hold on. We can only speculate what plan Lee would have followed had he been able to control all Confederate forces from the begining of the war.

    As good as Lee was, there is no evidence that he could have come up with a successful way to twart northern intentions. I believe, with the benefit of hindsight, that a purely defensive strategy the South could have prevailed but that is just speculation. I think it fair to state that few, if any understood the true impact that improvements in rifles and artillery would have. Perhaps this is the great key of the war. At the end Lee had grasped this and managed to work miracles of trench warfare. If perhaps the South had understood this at the begining of the war it would have been different. Of course, defensive warfare was counter to Southern culture so you might point to that as a contributing factor in the outcome as well.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Arrian
      Ok, my understanding of Lee's role in West Virginia appears to have been wrong. He didn't do anything particularly distinguished, but neither was he soundly beaten:

      -Arrian
      Well, Lee's performance was always linked to the performance of his sub-commanders. He tended to give more responsibility in carrying out operations to subordinates than other field commanders did.

      You can argue the pros and cons of that all day. Lee does get credit for recognizing the weaknesses of his officers and for addressing it. Organizing the ANV into wings under Longstreet and Jackson was probably a masterstroke. At its height the ANV was a well coordinated and lethal war machine. The loss of Jackson ended that.

      If you rate the generals on their ability to led an attack on the battlefield who would compare to Jackson?

      Comment


      • At the end Lee had grasped this and managed to work miracles of trench warfare.


        I'd actually have to give credit to this to Longstreet. He was the defensive genius after all, whose defensive strategies were studied for years afterwards in military acadamies all over Europe.
        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

        Comment


        • I can't argue the point about Longstreet. He was on a par with Lee, Jackson, and Stuart. They had different roles to play and they were outstanding as individuals as well as a group, but as Mr. Fun says, they were men not gods.

          Comment


          • Jackson was a God though .
            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
              Jackson was a God though .
              Well, a bit of a religious fanatic maybe.

              But, he was OUR religious fanatic!

              Comment


              • grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by GePap


                  yes, they are famous-and their armies crushed-their states defeated.

                  So again, famous but on the loosing side of history-much like the generals of the wehrmacht
                  What's your point? Obviously, they lost, but they have had just as much an effect on history as the winning generals*, often.

                  *this is the important part

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Capt Dizle
                    Grant was relentless and decisive. I just don't see a lot of evidence of particular skill or brilliance.
                    Non sequiter.

                    Comment


                    • Generals who become presidents automatically get put on money.. right?
                      Monkey!!!

                      Comment


                      • Eisenhower?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by centrifuge
                          Keep Grant, but give something to Truman!!!


                          Truman the War Criminal?
                          Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X