Kerry in Sex scandal!!!!

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by MrFun
What I meant by "coming from behind" was that, from out of nowhere, without any insult from me directed to you, you made a slanderous insult about me.

Slanderous? Are you meaning that someone, somewhere, could possibly interpret my saying you lack bony vertebrae to mean actually that? That you are a quadrapelegic in a hospital somewhere typing away on the internet with an eye laser? Really now, yuo have such a low opinion of others' intellectual capacities.

[The Mad Monk]

Originally posted by GePap
This is just the first shot. Bush and his cronies have 200 million dollars to go after whomever gets the dem. nomination. Honestly, I think Dean has the smallets number of things in his "closet" to go after, certainly less than Bush, and he is the most honest about it- of course, he has been utterly unfairly labelled a nut, and he does not have the money to undo that mischaracterization when the republicans would be pouring so much money into the campaing to make it stick.

It should also be noted that as long as the nomination process is not "locked up", the Democrats must continue spending time, money and energy against each other that would otherwise be going against Bush.

Any lengthening of the process is good.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Slanderous? Are you meaning that someone, somewhere, could possibly interpret my saying you lack bony vertebrae to mean actually that? That you are a quadrapelegic in a hospital somewhere typing away on the internet with an eye laser? Really now, yuo have such a low opinion of others' intellectual capacities.

No -- as in, that I believe everything the media presents, which is what I meant by slanderous insult.

[GePap]

Yeah, the number done on Dean was absurd and I am very angry about it.

Dean has said he think Edwards would make a much better candidate than Kerry..

The thing about Kerry is this: he wins in Iowa big becuase gephartd and Dean kept killing each other, and the press was doing it's number on Dean...so then we get the results, and the "scream" and all of a sudden Dean falls and Kerry surges, simply on the fact he won Iowa and because for some reaosn people though he is "electable" (I sitll love Kucinich's response to this moronic issue)- and then Terry McAuffile got what he wanted- a front loaded system in which one person snowballed so rapidly there could be little challenge that the party could be done and unified fast-and still ha dresources to take on the Bush money mahcine.

Kerry is not ahead becuase voters love him- but becuase dems want Bush out and they will vote for whom they think has the best chance to win a general eelction, not whom THEY think is best- which to me is the wrong criteria.

[Sprayber]

How is everyone else scoring che vs fun

[Lancer]

MrFun, I think that what Che is trying to say is that he wouldn't have expected someone 'coming from behind' to be the kind of thing that would upset you...

[DanS]

What's a little slip o' the salami next to that?

It really just depends on what the facts of the case are and how Kerry answers the charges. Both Bush and Schwarzenegger basically came clean with what they did (while not detailing what they did). We'll see if Kerry does the same, or if, in fact, there's nothing there. If it's intern play, then that's pretty damning, if only because it's so close to what Clinton did and we don't want any more of that.

[GePap]

Originally posted by The Mad Monk


It should also be noted that as long as the nomination process is not "locked up", the Democrats must continue spending time, money and energy against each other that would otherwise be going against Bush.

Any lengthening of the process is good.

Cause of course you love the Bush precidency..but you live in NJ, so a vote for Bush there is throwing away your vote

[GePap]

Originally posted by Sprayber


How is everyone else scoring che vs fun

Lets see" MrFun basically states his support for his presidential candidate is very weak and elastic and anything will make him switch- Che calls him a spineless weakling for that, things go from there...

IN tact-MrFun certainly
IN content of arguement? Che.

[GePap]

AND FOR GOD SAKES WHAT THE HELL ARE THE CHARGES!!!

[MrFun]

Originally posted by GePap


Lets see" MrFun basically states his support for his presidential candidate is very weak and elastic and anything will make him switch- Che calls him a spineless weakling for that, things go from there...

IN tact-MrFun certainly
IN content of arguement? Che.

Not anything will make me switch my support for a candidate.


Geez, I'm going to have trouble keeping track of all the false statements made about me in this thread.

[curtsibling]

Imagine if he had been 'unfaithful' with a guy!

Now there is something worth making an uproar over!

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by MrFun
What I meant by "coming from behind" was that, from out of nowhere, without any insult from me directed to you, you made a slanderous insult about me.

Lest you forgot.

Originally posted by MrFun
I'm so glad that you have the authority of a deity/demigod ego as to think you can dictate to everyone that we should abide by YOUR standards.

Originally posted by MrFun
Chegitz doesn't like the fact that there are people who think differently from him.

[The Mad Monk]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
If integrity mattered, Carter would have been relected and none of the Presidents following him would have been.

Integrity matters, but incompetance trumps integrity.

[GePap]

You left Dean becuase of the "scream" issue, which has been shown to be a non-issue.

Ned implies there might be a sex scandal of some sort (but we know absolutely nothing about what the charges are) and you are ready to say if it turns out to be true, you will withdraw your support for Kerry...

What won;t make you change yoour mind about a candidate? You are OK with them getting haircuts perhaps?