Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The death of critical theory/analysis?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Post-modernism is a symptom of the end of the vibrancy of Western/European civilization. It's downhill from there.
    Tutto nel mondo è burla

    Comment


    • #17
      Critical Theory died in the eighties with the Birmingham School of Cultural Studies theorists surely? (Which in turn died with the twin spectres of post-structuralism and post-socialist radical feminism?)
      Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
      Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

      Comment


      • #18
        Post structuralism sucks! Superstructuralism (at the risk of sounding deterministic):
        "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
        "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Boris Godunov
          Post-modernism is a symptom of the end of the vibrancy of Western/European civilization. It's downhill from there.
          Don't let Paiktis see that post.
          Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

          Comment


          • #20
            My original statement includes the word "evil" which I take to mean the presence of an emotion, as few rational people would claim evil to exist in its absolute definition.
            The use of "evil" doesn´t indicate emotion per se, it is a moral judgement. I could say it is justified to call him evil due to his actions, hence the argument is not emotional. I don´t understand the big difference here between using "evil" in this sense, or saying he´s responsible for mass killings due to his actions.

            Edit: you could say that the use of "evil" maybe appeals more on the emotions of an audience, however, if you can justify the use of this word in a reasonable way it is still not an emotional argument as such.
            Last edited by BeBMan; January 14, 2004, 17:27.
            Blah

            Comment


            • #21
              No worries, Sprayber - he's still banned.
              Tutto nel mondo è burla

              Comment


              • #22
                The use of "evil" doesn´t indicate emotion per se, it is a moral judgement. I could say it is justified to call him evil due to his actions, hence the argument is not emotional. I don´t understand the big difference here between using "evil" in this sense, or saying he´s responsible for mass killings due to his actions.
                BeBro: I'm an emotivist, meaning whenever we make a moral judgement, we make an emotional yay or nay. Such things tend to absolutes. For example, if I walk in on someone having intercourse with a frozen chicken, I will immediately think it absolutely wrong, though philosophically and logically I know that my own morality only dictates what I will do and not form the basis for a philosophical system of my own, most people in my experience will forge a philosophical system attempting to account for the man and his chicken.
                "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
                "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Whaleboy


                  BeBro: I'm an emotivist, meaning whenever we make a moral judgement, we make an emotional yay or nay.
                  No offense, but that doesn´t make sense. In that way, we simply should avoid any moral judgement. But I can make such judgements based on reason. It is absolutely reasonable to argue that murder should be morally wrong, because a society which sees murder as something morally good and desirable would end up exterminating itself. That I can say totally without making an emotional statement (at least as I´d understand it - driven purely by emotion).
                  Blah

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Thank Christ those loons are being purged from philosophy.

                    It's the Analytic movement all the way babies!!
                    Only feebs vote.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      But you could lead us into the light
                      Blah

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: The death of critical theory/analysis?

                        Originally posted by Whaleboy
                        I'd rather use my brain than hormones in conceptual and political matters.
                        You could have fooled us.
                        Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
                        Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
                        "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
                        From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Such is my experience already and I'm not even 19 yet!!
                          Keep this FIRMLY in mind. I'm not trying to put you down based on your age, don't get me wrong. But it would be a good idea for you to keep an open mind about things as your experience grows.

                          -Arrian
                          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by BeBro


                            No offense, but that doesn�t make sense. In that way, we simply should avoid any moral judgement. But I can make such judgements based on reason. It is absolutely reasonable to argue that murder should be morally wrong, because a society which sees murder as something morally good and desirable would end up exterminating itself. That I can say totally without making an emotional statement (at least as I�d understand it - driven purely by emotion).
                            The Thuggee cult?
                            Only feebs vote.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Did they kill eachother?
                              Blah

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by BeBro
                                But you could lead us into the light
                                His light would likely turn out to be mostly IR: lots of heat but not very illuminating (except to certain mutants).
                                Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
                                Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
                                "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
                                From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X