Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Enron CFO to plead guilty!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Enron CFO to plead guilty!

    (CNN) -- Former Enron chief financial officer Andrew Fastow and his wife have agreed to plead guilty for their roles in the accounting scandal that rocked the corporate world and brought down the energy giant, sources with knowledge of the case said Tuesday.

    The sources, who asked not to be identified, would not disclose details of the agreement.

    It's expected the couple will enter their pleas in federal court in Houston Wednesday, the sources said, adding that any deal could still fall apart.

    Fastow spokesman Gordon Andrew refused comment on the report, and the Justice Department had no comment.

    Fastow and his wife Lea Fastow have been negotiating with the government for months. An attorney for Lea Fastow said last week the two were trying to get an agreement that would allow one of them to remain at home with their two children while the other was serving prison time.

    Andrew Fastow is the highest-ranking executive charged in the Enron scandal, and is the alleged mastermind behind the web of complex accounting deals that led to the energy giant's bankruptcy more than two years ago.

    A tentative trial date is set for April 20 for him.

    If a plea agreement is indeed reached, Fastow could implicate his bosses, former Enron CEOs Jeffrey Skilling and Kenneth Lay, who are still under investigation but have not been charged.

    Andrew Fastow was indicted on 78 counts of wire fraud, money laundering and conspiracy in October 2002 by a federal grand jury in Houston. A superseding indictment returned last May increased the number of charges against him to nearly 100 counts.

    The charges against him allege that he masterminded a series of schemes that hid Enron's debt, inflated profits and allowed him to skim millions of dollars for himself, his family and friends and colleagues.

    Lea Fastow, once an assistant treasurer at Enron, is charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, money laundering conspiracy and filing false tax returns for collaborating with her husband in the alleged scheme years after she left the company.

    She resigned from the company in 1997, a year before her husband was named chief financial officer.

    Lea Fastow is scheduled to stand trial February 10.

    Michael Kopper, who worked for Andrew Fastow, was the first Enron executive to plead guilty. In August 2002, he pled guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. He also agreed to help investigators.

    Kopper agreed to cooperate with prosecutors and pay $12 million in restitution as part of a plea-bargain deal. He was released on $5 million bail. (Full story)

    CNNfn correspondent Jen Rogers contributed to this report.
    He's going to jail. Let's hope he is able to implicate Lay at last.
    "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

    "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

  • #2
    We need to get Skilling and Lay into jail and into paying billions.

    Comment


    • #3
      And now back to insider business as usual.
      "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
      -Bokonon

      Comment


      • #4
        So say the uninformed... thanks Ramo .
        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

        Comment


        • #5
          When it comes to actual crimes committed, Fastow and Skilling are the key guys.

          Lay (from what I've read) for the most part allowed them to do what they did by the simple matter of not trying to find out... it was like "I don't know how your making your money and I don't want to know: just keep doing it." Of course, allowing such an environment to develop is a crime too.

          Comment


          • #6
            Never mind the CFO - will he implicate the CEO or will he do 999 years on Pluto?

            (I think he'll deal. Most of us would given the choice).
            Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
            "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

            Comment


            • #7
              HANG THE BASTARDS!!!
              We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
              If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
              Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Cruddy
                Never mind the CFO - will he implicate the CEO or will he do 999 years on Pluto?
                Considering that Fastow is the mastermind behind the illegal deals that destroyed Enron one can hardly "not mind" him, you know?

                Comment


                • #9
                  True. But for political reasons, Lay is obvious the more important target.
                  "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

                  "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JohnT


                    Considering that Fastow is the mastermind behind the illegal deals that destroyed Enron one can hardly "not mind" him, you know?
                    But Fastow could not have acted without the go ahead from his superior - sure, he could have embezzled a mountain of dough, but to actually structure a whole company takes more than just being the Chief Financial Officer.

                    I mean, you sound like "The S.D killed all the Jews in the Holocaust" and then totally ignoring Hitler's role. Factually it's true (Hitler didn't work light his own gas ovens) but it over simplifies responsibility.
                    Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
                    "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yeah, it comes with being the top guy. However, now that Fastow has cracked, we'll likely see a rather swift conclusion to the Lay and Skilling cases (well, maybe not Skilling as he sounds too prideful to plead).

                      I think I've heard "ten years" bandied about in re: to the Fastow's sentences. My question is this: Assuming for simplicities sake that Fastow is the major crook*, the one who really brought down Enron, how big should Lay's sentence, as Fastows boss, be for allowing such a permissive culture to exist?

                      *From the above article:

                      Andrew Fastow is the highest-ranking executive charged in the Enron scandal, and is the alleged mastermind behind the web of complex accounting deals that led to the energy giant's bankruptcy more than two years ago.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Cruddy


                        But Fastow could not have acted without the go ahead from his superior - sure, he could have embezzled a mountain of dough, but to actually structure a whole company takes more than just being the Chief Financial Officer.
                        Enron (and a lot of companies) didn't work like that, however. Fastow's authority was actually derived from Skilling and the Board (he needed Board approval to do some of the things he did), and for the most part Lay was a non-player in the LJM* deals.

                        *From memory... I'll look it up, but essentially Fastow set up three "funds" that were set up for the purpose of moving non-performing assets off Enrons books as to manipulate earnings and inflate the (Enrons) stock price.
                        Last edited by JohnT; January 16, 2004, 09:33.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Lay was CEO. Skilling was President. Fastow was Treasurer. Fastow reported to Skilling who reported to Lay. Skilling gave Fastow the go-ahead and, at times, deceived Lay and the Board as to what was really going on.

                          Now, I agree: Lay is ultimately responsible for creating such a permissive culture, but, in my readings, he didn't actually give any orders to defraud - Fastow and Skilling did.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Skilling used to work at my firm.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              You're with McKinsey?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X